Re: Obsoleting zlib in Fedora Rawhide

2024-01-09 Thread Yaakov Selkowitz
On Tue, 2024-01-09 at 18:53 +, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > On Mon, Dec 04, 2023 at 04:10:18PM -0300, Tulio Magno Quites Machado > Filho wrote: > > Following the recent approval from Fesco, I'm planning to > > distribute > > zlib-ng-compat packages for Rawhide later this week. > > I hope this

Re: Obsoleting zlib in Fedora Rawhide

2024-01-09 Thread Daniel P . Berrangé
On Mon, Dec 04, 2023 at 04:10:18PM -0300, Tulio Magno Quites Machado Filho wrote: > Following the recent approval from Fesco, I'm planning to distribute > zlib-ng-compat packages for Rawhide later this week. > I hope this will give us enough time to work on the issues before > Fedora 40 is

Re: Obsoleting zlib in Fedora Rawhide

2023-12-19 Thread Tulio Magno Quites Machado Filho
Tulio Magno Quites Machado Filho writes: > Following the recent approval from Fesco, I'm planning to distribute > zlib-ng-compat packages for Rawhide later this week. > I hope this will give us enough time to work on the issues before > Fedora 40 is released. 爛 > > So, keep in mind this will

Re: Obsoleting zlib in Fedora Rawhide

2023-12-06 Thread Daniel Alley
> Except that it's not 100% compatible, since all those packages aren't > building/working with zlib-ng-compat. At a minimum, you should be able > to show that everything zlib-dependent successfully rebuilds with this, > and since you've already identified some that don't, IMO they should be >

Re: Obsoleting zlib in Fedora Rawhide

2023-12-06 Thread Tulio Magno Quites Machado Filho
Yaakov Selkowitz writes: > Except that it's not 100% compatible, since all those packages aren't > building/working with zlib-ng-compat. At a minimum, you should be able > to show that everything zlib-dependent successfully rebuilds with this, I'm afraid I was not clear enough. Packages built

Re: Obsoleting zlib in Fedora Rawhide

2023-12-06 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 06. 12. 23 0:09, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: Except that it's not 100% compatible, since all those packages aren't building/working with zlib-ng-compat. At a minimum, you should be able to show that everything zlib-dependent successfully rebuilds with this, and since you've already identified

Re: Obsoleting zlib in Fedora Rawhide

2023-12-05 Thread Yaakov Selkowitz
On Tue, 2023-12-05 at 16:34 -0300, Tulio Magno Quites Machado Filho wrote: > Yaakov Selkowitz writes: > > > Also, since this is essentially an SONAME change wrt zlib, the > > initial > > build and mini-mass-rebuild of all dependents should occur in a > > side- > > tag.  You're announcement

Re: Obsoleting zlib in Fedora Rawhide

2023-12-05 Thread Tulio Magno Quites Machado Filho
Yaakov Selkowitz writes: > Also, since this is essentially an SONAME change wrt zlib, the initial > build and mini-mass-rebuild of all dependents should occur in a side- > tag. You're announcement doesn't mention this occurring. There are no SONAME changes. With zlib we have: $ rpm -qf

Re: Obsoleting zlib in Fedora Rawhide

2023-12-05 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 05. 12. 23 19:21, Tulio Magno Quites Machado Filho wrote: Miro Hrončok writes: Do you happen to have a build.log available for this? I re-run the tests for all architectures here: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/tuliom/zlib-ng-compat-mpb/build/6726758/ Keep in mind that zlib-ng

Re: Obsoleting zlib in Fedora Rawhide

2023-12-05 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 1:28 PM Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: > > On Mon, 2023-12-04 at 16:10 -0300, Tulio Magno Quites Machado Filho > wrote: > > Following the recent approval from Fesco, I'm planning to distribute > > zlib-ng-compat packages for Rawhide later this week. > > I hope this will give us

Re: Obsoleting zlib in Fedora Rawhide

2023-12-05 Thread Yaakov Selkowitz
On Mon, 2023-12-04 at 16:10 -0300, Tulio Magno Quites Machado Filho wrote: > Following the recent approval from Fesco, I'm planning to distribute > zlib-ng-compat packages for Rawhide later this week. > I hope this will give us enough time to work on the issues before > Fedora 40 is released. 爛 >

Re: Obsoleting zlib in Fedora Rawhide

2023-12-05 Thread Tulio Magno Quites Machado Filho
Miro Hrončok writes: > Do you happen to have a build.log available for this? I re-run the tests for all architectures here: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/tuliom/zlib-ng-compat-mpb/build/6726758/ Keep in mind that zlib-ng defines the following: #define ZLIB_VERSION "1.3.0.zlib-ng"

Re: Obsoleting zlib in Fedora Rawhide

2023-12-05 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 04. 12. 23 20:10, Tulio Magno Quites Machado Filho wrote: Following the recent approval from Fesco, I'm planning to distribute zlib-ng-compat packages for Rawhide later this week. I hope this will give us enough time to work on the issues before Fedora 40 is released. 爛 So, keep in mind this

Re: Obsoleting zlib in Fedora Rawhide

2023-12-04 Thread Lukas Javorsky
Also the `minizip-compat` subpackage will be removed as it's part of the zlib. There are only two packages that couldn't build with the minizip-ng-compat: chromium libdigidocpp Than, please switch chromium to bundled minizip as we agreed in BZ#2242271. The change for Minizip is here:

Re: Obsoleting zlib in Fedora Rawhide

2023-12-04 Thread Tulio Magno Quites Machado Filho
Re-sending to binutils, openexr and python3.12 maintainers. Sorry, I messed up your email aliases in my first message. -- Tulio Magno Tulio Magno Quites Machado Filho writes: > Following the recent approval from Fesco, I'm planning to distribute > zlib-ng-compat packages for Rawhide later

Obsoleting zlib in Fedora Rawhide

2023-12-04 Thread Tulio Magno Quites Machado Filho
Following the recent approval from Fesco, I'm planning to distribute zlib-ng-compat packages for Rawhide later this week. I hope this will give us enough time to work on the issues before Fedora 40 is released. 爛 So, keep in mind this will *obsolete zlib in Rawhide*. This update is also known