Re: Oops on i686, 4.2.0-0.rc8, was: Summary/Minutes from...

2015-08-30 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Sun, Aug 30, 2015 at 01:07:36PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote: And is there a meaningful difference this is an fc23 kernel, not fc24? I don't know. If fc23 has the same kernel, I see no reason why it wouldn't have the same bug, but I didn't try it on fc23. Rich. -- Richard Jones,

Re: Oops on i686, 4.2.0-0.rc8, was: Summary/Minutes from...

2015-08-30 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Sun, Aug 30, 2015 at 01:07:36PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote: On Sun, Aug 30, 2015 at 12:39 PM, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258223 I have i686 hardware (ancient Dell laptop) running 4.2.0-0.rc8.git0.1.fc23.i686 for over 24 hours

Oops on i686, 4.2.0-0.rc8, was: Summary/Minutes from...

2015-08-30 Thread Chris Murphy
On Sun, Aug 30, 2015 at 12:39 PM, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258223 I have i686 hardware (ancient Dell laptop) running 4.2.0-0.rc8.git0.1.fc23.i686 for over 24 hours with some heavy btrfs + rsync stuff, and no oopses. What would I