On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 04:46:46PM -0600, Jerry James wrote:
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 3:28 PM, Ville Skyttä ville.sky...@iki.fi wrote:
For rpm = 4.9, there's __provides_exclude and __provides_exclude_from
which I believe don't have those problems.
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 10:54 AM, Toshio Kuratomi a.bad...@gmail.com wrote:
If you spend the time to figure out how to make these work, the FPC would
love to have the Guidelines that deal with Filtering updated. There's
a start of a draft linked from this ticket:
Hello all:
I am hoping it is OK to discuss this here. I came across this problem
when I was building a custom spin where the kickstart file installs
'openmpi' before 'emacs'.
When I start emacs, here is what I get:
$emacs
emacs: error while loading shared libraries: libotf.so.0: cannot open
On Wed, 2011-07-06 at 20:03 +1000, Amit Saha wrote:
Hello all:
I am hoping it is OK to discuss this here. I came across this problem
when I was building a custom spin where the kickstart file installs
'openmpi' before 'emacs'.
When I start emacs, here is what I get:
$emacs
emacs:
On Wed, 2011-07-06 at 22:46 +0300, Jussi Lehtola wrote:
On Wed, 06 Jul 2011 12:39:14 -0700
Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, 2011-07-06 at 20:03 +1000, Amit Saha wrote:
So, this library is missing. However, this should have been
installed as its a dependency, right?
On Wed, 06 Jul 2011 12:54:48 -0700
Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
It's certainly not the same libotf, since OpenMPI does not have
*anything* to do with truetype fonts.
Even though the library is installed in a non-system directory,
applications that link against libotf will
On Wed, 2011-07-06 at 23:02 +0300, Jussi Lehtola wrote:
On Wed, 06 Jul 2011 12:54:48 -0700
Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
It's certainly not the same libotf, since OpenMPI does not have
*anything* to do with truetype fonts.
Even though the library is installed in a
Adam Williamson wrote on Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 12:54:48PM -0700:
On Wed, 2011-07-06 at 22:46 +0300, Jussi Lehtola wrote:
On Wed, 06 Jul 2011 12:39:14 -0700
Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, 2011-07-06 at 20:03 +1000, Amit Saha wrote:
So, this library is missing.
On Wed, 2011-07-06 at 15:24 -0500, Mátyás Selmeci wrote:
Well, packages get an auto-generated Requires: for libotf.so.0. Anything
that claims to provide libotf.so.0 will satisfy this. The most correct
solution is simply for openmpi to stop claiming to provide libotf.so.0
because, for
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 2:26 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/AutoReqProv_%28draft%29#Removing_items_from_the_provides_stream_.28post-scan_filtering.29
Or rather
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:AutoProvidesAndRequiresFiltering,
and I can't use
On Wed, 06 Jul 2011 13:09:41 -0700
Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
.. but on the other hand, the same logic applies in the opposite
sense: if something requires OpenMPI's libotf.so.0, also the
truetype libotf will satisfy the requirement. (Although openmpi
apps typically link to
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 3:28 PM, Ville Skyttä ville.sky...@iki.fi wrote:
For rpm = 4.9, there's __provides_exclude and __provides_exclude_from
which I believe don't have those problems.
http://rpm.org/wiki/PackagerDocs/DependencyGenerator#TweakingDependencyGenerators
Oh, excellent! Thanks,
12 matches
Mail list logo
