On 2015-02-12, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote:
Feel free, however, to build SDL without aRts and esound support. The only
reason aRts is still in Fedora at all is for things that support ONLY aRts
for sound output (in particular, the knotify in kdelibs3 and the kdelibs3
game
Petr Pisar wrote:
On 2015-02-12, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Feel free, however, to build SDL without aRts and esound support. The
only reason aRts is still in Fedora at all is for things that support
ONLY aRts for sound output (in particular, the knotify in kdelibs3 and
the kdelibs3 game
On 2015-02-16, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote:
Petr Pisar wrote:
You are missing the point that Fedora clients can be run against
non-Fedora servers.
A remote aRts sound server? Sure, it's possible in theory
(http://lists.kde.org/?l=kdem=101656194718836w=2), but in practice:
*
Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
I did a test build of SDL without the audiofile + arts + esound
dependencies (arts + esound also seem to need audiofile), and it
builds fine, so that is one route out of this.
Audiofile is bound to stay, and SDL should remain built against it, as
removing it would
If I'm reading that right, audiofile being orphaned affects SDL which
then affects some important packages like qemu.
I did a test build of SDL without the audiofile + arts + esound
dependencies (arts + esound also seem to need audiofile), and it
builds fine, so that is one route out of this.
On 2015-02-11, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote:
If I'm reading that right, audiofile being orphaned affects SDL which
then affects some important packages like qemu.
The audiofile has already been unorphaned by mschwendt.
-- Petr
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
audiofileorphan, ajax, alexl, caillon, caolanm, 1 weeks ago
group::gnome-sig, johnp, mbarnes,
rhughes, rstrode, ssp, xiphmont
I've added myself there, since there are tons of deps on it
