On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 09:59:42AM +0100, Petr Pisar wrote:
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 06:20:01PM +0100, Iain Arnell wrote:
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 3:55 PM, Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com wrote:
any chance you could generate that list with the reverse
(build-)dependencies as well? Would help
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 06:20:01PM +0100, Iain Arnell wrote:
any chance you could generate that list with the reverse
(build-)dependencies as well? Would help to identify the leaves that can be
left to die and allow those that really matter to be picked up by people who
care most about them.
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 06:20:01PM +0100, Iain Arnell wrote:
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 3:55 PM, Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com wrote:
any chance you could generate that list with the reverse
(build-)dependencies as well? Would help to identify the leaves that can be
left to die and allow those
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 3:55 PM, Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com wrote:
Hello,
list of Perl packages which are orphaned in rawhide follows (101 now). Feel
free to grab them. F17 branching from rawhide is planned to 2012-02-07. I will
be sending updated list regularly to the begining of February.
Hello,
list of Perl packages which are orphaned in rawhide follows (101 now). Feel
free to grab them. F17 branching from rawhide is planned to 2012-02-07. I will
be sending updated list regularly to the begining of February. Then I will
have taken the remaining packages to my ownership (except
On 2012-01-16 14:55, Petr Pisar wrote:
Hello,
list of Perl packages which are orphaned in rawhide follows (101 now). Feel
free to grab them. F17 branching from rawhide is planned to 2012-02-07. I will
be sending updated list regularly to the begining of February. Then I will
have taken the
