Re: Package add request

On 30/09/17 13:24 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote: adel...@zegrapher.com wrote: Yea well, since I used the convention of including libs only in the .h I didn't do so. But yes you're right! I will update that. Well, that convention doesn't make sense to begin with. You should only #include in the

Re: Package add request

adel...@zegrapher.com wrote: > Yea well, since I used the convention of including libs only in the .h I > didn't do so. But yes you're right! I will update that. Well, that convention doesn't make sense to begin with. You should only #include in the .h file what you actually need to declare

Re: Package add request

On 28.09.2017 00:22, Kevin Kofler wrote: adel...@zegrapher.com wrote: and Boost for only one small function Since I was curious, I looked for that function and found it in polynomial.cpp. But why do you include the headers in polynomial.h? The usage of Boost in Polynomial::translateX is an

Re: Package add request

adel...@zegrapher.com wrote: > and Boost for only one small function Since I was curious, I looked for that function and found it in polynomial.cpp. But why do you include the headers in polynomial.h? The usage of Boost in Polynomial::translateX is an implementation detail and so the headers

Re: Package add request

/*Jason L Tibbitts Iii*/ wrote on Tue, 26 Sep 2017 22:49:18 -0500: "HV" == Hedayat Vatankhah writes: HV> I'd say to stick with upstream naming, which is the Fedora HV> way. Changing the names to lower case is a must in Debian, they HV> simply don't allow upper case

Re: Package add request

On 27 Sep 2017 04:50, "Jason L Tibbitts III" wrote: > "HV" == Hedayat Vatankhah writes: HV> I'd say to stick with upstream naming, which is the Fedora HV> way. Changing the names to lower case is a must in Debian, they HV> simply don't allow upper

Re: Package add request

> "HV" == Hedayat Vatankhah writes: HV> I'd say to stick with upstream naming, which is the Fedora HV> way. Changing the names to lower case is a must in Debian, they HV> simply don't allow upper case letters to be in package names. The HV> developer clearly prefers

Re: Package add request

/*Samuel Rakitničan*/ wrote on Mon, 25 Sep 2017 23:15:25 -: Here it is: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/srakitnican/default/build/607839/ Still not sure about naming issue, package wants to name files ZeGrapher, I called the package zegrapher, debian maintainers go a step further

Re: Package add request

/*Samuel Rakitničan*/ wrote on Mon, 25 Sep 2017 23:15:25 -: Here it is: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/srakitnican/default/build/607839/ Still not sure about naming issue, package wants to name files ZeGrapher, I called the package zegrapher, debian maintainers go a step further

Re: Package add request

On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 11:15:25PM -, Samuel Rakitničan wrote: > Here it is: > https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/srakitnican/default/build/607839/ > > Still not sure about naming issue, package wants to name files ZeGrapher, I > called the package zegrapher, debian maintainers go a

Re: Package add request

On lundi 25 septembre 2017 21:27:34 CEST adel...@zegrapher.com wrote: > Hello! > > I am contacting you here because I have found this thread [1] on > askfedora, I hope I am not bothering by sending this mail (in the wrong > list). If I am doing so, please accept my excuses in advance... > > So!

Re: Package add request

Here it is: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/srakitnican/default/build/607839/ Still not sure about naming issue, package wants to name files ZeGrapher, I called the package zegrapher, debian maintainers go a step further and call package files zegrapher also. TODO: AppStream metadata

Package add request

Hello! I am contacting you here because I have found this thread [1] on askfedora, I hope I am not bothering by sending this mail (in the wrong list). If I am doing so, please accept my excuses in advance... So! I am the author of ZeGrapher [2], a very intuitive math plotting software that