Re: Package review requests: Splitting the "sustmi" GNOME Shell extensions into separate packages

2018-01-26 Thread Rex Dieter
Andrew Toskin wrote: > One more time: both of the newly split packages have been marked as > approved on Bugzilla, but I can't get anyone to do whatever final approval > is needed for the old "sustmi" GNOME Shell extensions to become two > separate packages in Fedora. I started this process back

Re: Package review requests: Splitting the "sustmi" GNOME Shell extensions into separate packages

2018-01-25 Thread Andrew Toskin
One more time: both of the newly split packages have been marked as approved on Bugzilla, but I can't get anyone to do whatever final approval is needed for the old "sustmi" GNOME Shell extensions to become two separate packages in Fedora. I started this process back in October. I'd like to be

Re: Package review requests: Splitting the "sustmi" GNOME Shell extensions into separate packages

2017-12-12 Thread Andrew Toskin
Update: I'm still working on splitting the "sustmi" GNOME Shell extension subpackages into their own packages. I've opened an issue on the releng pagure page: https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7124 I've also executed `fedpkg retire ...` for the old package on EPEL7, f27, and master. And the

Package review requests: Splitting the "sustmi" GNOME Shell extensions into separate packages

2017-10-25 Thread Andrew Toskin
I'm the RPM package maintainer for these two GNOME Shell extensions: * gnome-shell-extension-sustmi-windowoverlay-icons * gnome-shell-extension-sustmi-historymanager-prefix-search They're both currently subpackages of the main "sustmi" package, because upstream had been developing them in a