On Mon, 2013-03-18 at 11:27 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 16.03.2013 19:26, schrieb Rex Dieter:
Lukáš Nykrýn wrote:
After usr move packages should not install files to /sbin.
That's not necessarily true. Do our packaging guidelines actually say
that anywhere?
Michal Sekletar wrote:
On Mon, 2013-03-18 at 11:27 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 16.03.2013 19:26, schrieb Rex Dieter:
Lukáš Nykrýn wrote:
After usr move packages should not install files to /sbin.
That's not necessarily true. Do our packaging guidelines
Hi Rex,
On Tue, 2013-03-19 at 07:57 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
Michal Sekletar wrote:
On Mon, 2013-03-18 at 11:27 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 16.03.2013 19:26, schrieb Rex Dieter:
Lukáš Nykrýn wrote:
After usr move packages should not install files to
Am 19.03.2013 13:42, schrieb Michal Sekletar:
On Mon, 2013-03-18 at 11:27 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 16.03.2013 19:26, schrieb Rex Dieter:
Lukáš Nykrýn wrote:
After usr move packages should not install files to /sbin.
That's not necessarily true. Do our packaging
Hi,
On Mar 19, 2013, at 13:54, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
Am 19.03.2013 13:42, schrieb Michal Sekletar:
On Mon, 2013-03-18 at 11:27 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 16.03.2013 19:26, schrieb Rex Dieter:
Lukáš Nykrýn wrote:
After usr move packages
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 5:54 AM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.netwrote:
Am 19.03.2013 13:42, schrieb Michal Sekletar:
On Mon, 2013-03-18 at 11:27 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 16.03.2013 19:26, schrieb Rex Dieter:
Lukáš Nykrýn wrote:
After usr move packages
On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 8:10 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
Am 18.03.2013 01:06, schrieb Nico Kadel-Garcia:
On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 12:36 PM, Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com wrote:
2013/3/15 Lukáš Nykrýn lnyk...@redhat.com:
After usr move packages should not install files
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 5:22 AM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
Am 18.03.2013 08:27, schrieb Nico Kadel-Garcia:
On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 8:10 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net
wrote:
Am 18.03.2013 01:06, schrieb Nico Kadel-Garcia:
On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 12:36 PM,
On Fri, 15.03.13 11:07, Dan Mashal (dan.mas...@gmail.com) wrote:
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 11:04 AM, Michal Schmidt mschm...@redhat.com wrote:
On 03/15/2013 07:00 PM, Dan Mashal wrote:
Looks like you guys added provides(service) and fixed the problem.
Yes, Lukáš added it. He even
Am 18.03.2013 04:32, schrieb Mathieu Bridon:
On Sun, 2013-03-17 at 17:31 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 17.03.2013 17:12, schrieb Sérgio Basto:
On Sáb, 2013-03-16 at 19:42 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
[root@fileserver:~]$ system-config-users
The value for the SHELL variable was not found
Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 16.03.2013 19:26, schrieb Rex Dieter:
Lukáš Nykrýn wrote:
After usr move packages should not install files to /sbin.
That's not necessarily true. Do our packaging guidelines actually say
that anywhere?
but WHY are they not saying it clearly?
Because blindly
Am 18.03.2013 08:27, schrieb Nico Kadel-Garcia:
On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 8:10 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
Am 18.03.2013 01:06, schrieb Nico Kadel-Garcia:
On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 12:36 PM, Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com wrote:
2013/3/15 Lukáš Nykrýn lnyk...@redhat.com:
Am 16.03.2013 19:26, schrieb Rex Dieter:
Lukáš Nykrýn wrote:
After usr move packages should not install files to /sbin.
That's not necessarily true. Do our packaging guidelines actually say that
anywhere?
but WHY are they not saying it clearly?
until now UsrMove is a half-baken thing
On Sáb, 2013-03-16 at 19:42 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 16.03.2013 19:26, schrieb Rex Dieter:
Lukáš Nykrýn wrote:
After usr move packages should not install files to /sbin.
That's not necessarily true. Do our packaging guidelines actually say that
anywhere?
but WHY are
Am 17.03.2013 17:12, schrieb Sérgio Basto:
On Sáb, 2013-03-16 at 19:42 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 16.03.2013 19:26, schrieb Rex Dieter:
Lukáš Nykrýn wrote:
After usr move packages should not install files to /sbin.
That's not necessarily true. Do our packaging guidelines actually
2013/3/15 Lukáš Nykrýn lnyk...@redhat.com:
After usr move packages should not install files to /sbin. Unfortunately
there is a lot of packages requiring /sbin/service, which was recently moved
to /usr/sbin/, and these packages were uninstallable. As a workaround I have
put Provides:
Lukáš Nykrýn wrote:
After usr move packages should not install files to /sbin. Unfortunately
there is a lot of packages requiring /sbin/service, which was recently
moved to /usr/sbin/, and these packages were uninstallable. As a
workaround I have put Provides: /sbin/service in the initscript
On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 12:36 PM, Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com wrote:
2013/3/15 Lukáš Nykrýn lnyk...@redhat.com:
After usr move packages should not install files to /sbin. Unfortunately
there is a lot of packages requiring /sbin/service, which was recently moved
to /usr/sbin/, and these
On Sun, 2013-03-17 at 17:31 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 17.03.2013 17:12, schrieb Sérgio Basto:
On Sáb, 2013-03-16 at 19:42 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
[root@fileserver:~]$ system-config-users
The value for the SHELL variable was not found the /etc/shells file
This incident has been
Lukáš Nykrýn wrote:
After usr move packages should not install files to /sbin.
That's not necessarily true. Do our packaging guidelines actually say that
anywhere?
-- rex
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
After usr move packages should not install files to /sbin. Unfortunately
there is a lot of packages requiring /sbin/service, which was recently
moved to /usr/sbin/, and these packages were uninstallable. As a
workaround I have put Provides: /sbin/service in the initscript spec,
but I think
On Fri, 15 Mar 2013 17:38:53 +0100
Lukáš Nykrýn lnyk...@redhat.com wrote:
After usr move packages should not install files to /sbin.
Unfortunately there is a lot of packages requiring /sbin/service,
which was recently moved to /usr/sbin/, and these packages were
uninstallable. As a workaround
Pá 15. březen 2013, 17:47:05 CET, Kevin Fenzi napsal:
On Fri, 15 Mar 2013 17:38:53 +0100
Lukáš Nykrýn lnyk...@redhat.com wrote:
After usr move packages should not install files to /sbin.
Unfortunately there is a lot of packages requiring /sbin/service,
which was recently moved to /usr/sbin/,
On 03/15/2013 05:38 PM, Lukáš Nykrýn wrote:
After usr move packages should not install files to /sbin. Unfortunately
there is a lot of packages requiring /sbin/service, which was recently
moved to /usr/sbin/, and these packages were uninstallable. As a
workaround I have put Provides:
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 10:18 AM, Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de wrote:
On 03/15/2013 05:38 PM, Lukáš Nykrýn wrote:
After usr move packages should not install files to /sbin. Unfortunately
there is a lot of packages requiring /sbin/service, which was recently
moved to /usr/sbin/, and
On 03/15/2013 06:53 PM, Dan Mashal wrote:
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 10:18 AM, Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de wrote:
I am very much opposed to this change. You need to keep files which are
expected to be in /bin or /sbin under these paths.
/sbin is a symlink to /usr/sbin, so calling
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 10:56 AM, Michal Schmidt mschm...@redhat.com wrote:
On 03/15/2013 06:53 PM, Dan Mashal wrote:
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 10:18 AM, Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de
wrote:
I am very much opposed to this change. You need to keep files which are
expected to be in /bin or
On 03/15/2013 07:00 PM, Dan Mashal wrote:
Looks like you guys added provides(service) and fixed the problem.
Yes, Lukáš added it. He even mentioned it in the email that started this
thread. Still it would be nice to drop legacy provide name after
packages stop Requiring it.
Michal
--
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 5:52 PM, Lukáš Nykrýn lnyk...@redhat.com wrote:
Pá 15. březen 2013, 17:47:05 CET, Kevin Fenzi napsal:
On Fri, 15 Mar 2013 17:38:53 +0100
Lukáš Nykrýn lnyk...@redhat.com wrote:
After usr move packages should not install files to /sbin.
Unfortunately there is a lot of
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 11:04 AM, Michal Schmidt mschm...@redhat.com wrote:
On 03/15/2013 07:00 PM, Dan Mashal wrote:
Looks like you guys added provides(service) and fixed the problem.
Yes, Lukáš added it. He even mentioned it in the email that started this
thread. Still it would be nice to
On 03/15/2013 07:07 PM, Dan Mashal wrote:
Well I was reading an IRC discussion on devel. I'm like a horse with
blinders. This used to work and doesn't anymore.
I cannot be sure, but I think you're referring here to the breakage
caused by initscripts-9.45-1 due to the missing Provides:
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 11:15 AM, Michal Schmidt mschm...@redhat.com wrote:
On 03/15/2013 07:07 PM, Dan Mashal wrote:
Well I was reading an IRC discussion on devel. I'm like a horse with
blinders. This used to work and doesn't anymore.
I cannot be sure, but I think you're referring here to
On 15/03/13 11:07 AM, Dan Mashal wrote:
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 11:04 AM, Michal Schmidt mschm...@redhat.com wrote:
On 03/15/2013 07:00 PM, Dan Mashal wrote:
Looks like you guys added provides(service) and fixed the problem.
Yes, Lukáš added it. He even mentioned it in the email that
On 03/15/2013 10:38 AM, Lukáš Nykrýn wrote:
After usr move packages should not install files to /sbin. Unfortunately there
is a lot of packages requiring /sbin/service, which was recently moved to
/usr/sbin/, and these packages were uninstallable. As a workaround I have put
Provides:
34 matches
Mail list logo
