Re: Packages that failed to build with Python 3.9

2020-06-02 Thread Jonathan Wakely
On 03/06/20 01:04 +0200, Denis Arnaud wrote: Yes, sure, no problem. I'll rebuild them soon (maybe this weekend). A big big thanks to you, Jonathan, to have done that important Boost release! It is a lot of work, and the result is well appreciated! Also, just for the sake of following up on

Re: Packages that failed to build with Python 3.9

2020-06-02 Thread Denis Arnaud
Yes, sure, no problem. I'll rebuild them soon (maybe this weekend). A big big thanks to you, Jonathan, to have done that important Boost release! It is a lot of work, and the result is well appreciated! Also, just for the sake of following up on on-going Python development, my guess is that this

Re: Packages that failed to build with Python 3.9

2020-06-02 Thread Jonathan Wakely
On 01/06/20 02:14 -, Denis Arnaud wrote: Thanks for the follow up! | airinv airrac airtsp rmol sevmgr trademgen All those packages have been successfully rebuilt (after upstream upgrade): * airinv: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-d6b3c81762 * airrac:

Re: Packages that failed to build with Python 3.9

2020-06-01 Thread Dan Čermák
Miro Hrončok writes: > python-metaextract defolos This should be fixed in Rawhide as well. Cheers, Dan signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Re: Packages that failed to build with Python 3.9

2020-06-01 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 01. 06. 20 4:14, Denis Arnaud wrote: Thanks for the follow up! | airinv airrac airtsp rmol sevmgr trademgen All those packages have been successfully rebuilt (after upstream upgrade): * airinv: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-d6b3c81762 * airrac:

Re: Packages that failed to build with Python 3.9

2020-05-31 Thread Denis Arnaud
Thanks for the follow up! | airinv airrac airtsp rmol sevmgr trademgen All those packages have been successfully rebuilt (after upstream upgrade): * airinv: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-d6b3c81762 * airrac: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-bd268627aa *

Re: Packages that failed to build with Python 3.9

2020-05-31 Thread Leigh Scott
> On 31. 05. 20 17:09, Leigh Scott wrote: > > That's up to the maintainer. Seems reasonable to me. Thanks, patch forwarded to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1792059 ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe

Re: Packages that failed to build with Python 3.9

2020-05-31 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 31. 05. 20 17:09, Leigh Scott wrote: On 31. 05. 20 12:49, Leigh Scott wrote: Note that python-setproctitle already failed to built with Python 3.8 and the "fix" was to comment out the tests: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-setproctitle/c/d6d9620c3c4fa076... Hence, it built with

Re: Packages that failed to build with Python 3.9

2020-05-31 Thread Leigh Scott
> On 31. 05. 20 12:49, Leigh Scott wrote: > > Note that python-setproctitle already failed to built with Python 3.8 and the > "fix" was to comment out the tests: > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-setproctitle/c/d6d9620c3c4fa076... > > Hence, it built with Python 3.9 even if it

Re: Packages that failed to build with Python 3.9

2020-05-31 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 29. 05. 20 21:59, Miro Hrončok wrote: Hello. As you might already know, we have recently merged in the Python 3.9 side tag, despite several builds have not succeeded. We always aim for some compromise between having the side tag open for too long and having too many failures. ... cinch 

Re: Packages that failed to build with Python 3.9

2020-05-31 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 31. 05. 20 13:13, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: On Sun, May 31, 2020 at 01:09:31PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 31. 05. 20 13:04, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: On Sun, May 31, 2020 at 10:49:28AM -, Leigh Scott wrote: Even if the package builds it doesn't mean it's

Re: Packages that failed to build with Python 3.9

2020-05-31 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Sun, May 31, 2020 at 01:09:31PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 31. 05. 20 13:04, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > On Sun, May 31, 2020 at 10:49:28AM -, Leigh Scott wrote: > > > Even if the package builds it doesn't mean it's functional. > > > > > > $ cinnamon-settings > > >

Re: Packages that failed to build with Python 3.9

2020-05-31 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 31. 05. 20 13:04, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: On Sun, May 31, 2020 at 10:49:28AM -, Leigh Scott wrote: Even if the package builds it doesn't mean it's functional. $ cinnamon-settings Traceback (most recent call last): File

Re: Packages that failed to build with Python 3.9

2020-05-31 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Sun, May 31, 2020 at 10:49:28AM -, Leigh Scott wrote: > Even if the package builds it doesn't mean it's functional. > > $ cinnamon-settings > Traceback (most recent call last): > File "/usr/share/cinnamon/cinnamon-settings/cinnamon-settings.py", line 16, > in > from setproctitle

Re: Packages that failed to build with Python 3.9

2020-05-31 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 31. 05. 20 12:49, Leigh Scott wrote: Hello. As you might already know, we have recently merged in the Python 3.9 side tag, despite several builds have not succeeded. We always aim for some compromise between having the side tag open for too long and having too many failures. The packages,

Re: Packages that failed to build with Python 3.9

2020-05-31 Thread Leigh Scott
> Hello. > > As you might already know, we have recently merged in the Python 3.9 side > tag, > despite several builds have not succeeded. We always aim for some compromise > between having the side tag open for too long and having too many failures. > > The packages, when not rebuilt, are

Re: Packages that failed to build with Python 3.9

2020-05-31 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 30. 05. 20 11:56, Ján ONDREJ (SAL) wrote: Ahoj, Hey. I'll try to answer. som trocha zmateny z tych hlaseni. Je skoda, ze bugzilla priamo neobsahuje link na failed build. The bugzillas don't contain the failed build link, because they are primarily "fails to install" and not "fails

Re: [Forged Sender] Packages that failed to build with Python 3.9

2020-05-30 Thread Orion Poplawski
On 5/29/20 1:59 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote: orion  Mayavi paraview python-AppTools python-Traits python-envisage python-pyface python-scikit-image python-traitsui python-x2go paraview was fixed by besser82 - build in progress (thanks!) I've resolved the bootstrap loop between python-Traits

Re: Packages that failed to build with Python 3.9

2020-05-30 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 30. 05. 20 1:17, Adam Williamson wrote: On Fri, 2020-05-29 at 21:59 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: Hello. As you might already know, we have recently merged in the Python 3.9 side tag, despite several builds have not succeeded. We always aim for some compromise between having the side tag open

Re: Packages that failed to build with Python 3.9

2020-05-30 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 30. 05. 20 9:18, Przemo Firszt wrote: W dniu pią, 29.05.2020 o godzinie 23∶10 +0200, użytkownik Miro Hrončok napisał: [..] When will python3 in the rawhide buildroot be 3.9? It is. Note that the component name is python3.9, but the binary package is still python3. The python3 component

Re: Packages that failed to build with Python 3.9

2020-05-30 Thread Sérgio Basto
On Fri, 2020-05-29 at 21:59 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > mlt martinkg sergiomb I built mlt in opencv-4 side tag -- Sérgio M. B. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Re: Packages that failed to build with Python 3.9

2020-05-30 Thread Guido Aulisi
Il giorno ven, 29/05/2020 alle 21.59 +0200, Miro Hrončok ha scritto: > Hello. Hello, > As you might already know, we have recently merged in the Python 3.9 > side tag, > despite several builds have not succeeded. We always aim for some > compromise > between having the side tag open for too

Re: Packages that failed to build with Python 3.9

2020-05-30 Thread SAL
Ahoj, som trocha zmateny z tych hlaseni. Je skoda, ze bugzilla priamo neobsahuje link na failed build. Musim si ho pohladat sam. Skusal som rebuildnut tak ako si mi vravel, teda cez mock s konfiguraciou copr repo, ale neviem preco, tak ten build zbehne teraz bez problemov. Ale ked dam build

Re: Packages that failed to build with Python 3.9

2020-05-30 Thread Przemo Firszt
W dniu pią, 29.05.2020 o godzinie 23∶10 +0200, użytkownik Miro Hrončok napisał: > [..] > > > > > When will python3 in the rawhide buildroot be 3.9? > > It is. > > Note that the component name is python3.9, but the binary package is > still > python3. The python3 component is retired. > Hi

Re: Packages that failed to build with Python 3.9

2020-05-29 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 04:17:03PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > I fixed apsw and rebuilt calibre, which needed it. bugzilla2fedmsg I looked at apsw also, but in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1840234 the maintainer wanted to wait for a new release which is prepping upstream.

Re: Packages that failed to build with Python 3.9

2020-05-29 Thread Adam Williamson
On Fri, 2020-05-29 at 21:59 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > Hello. > > As you might already know, we have recently merged in the Python 3.9 side > tag, > despite several builds have not succeeded. We always aim for some compromise > between having the side tag open for too long and having too

Re: Packages that failed to build with Python 3.9

2020-05-29 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 09:59:27PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > coccinelle rjones This one has a bug and an upstream fix already, I "just" have to apply it: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1791765#c10 The only possible problem is it seems to be bundling a Python library

Re: Packages that failed to build with Python 3.9

2020-05-29 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 29. 05. 20 22:38, Gwyn Ciesla via devel wrote: ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On Friday, May 29, 2020 2:59 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote: Hello. As you might already know, we have recently merged in the Python 3.9 side tag, despite several builds have not succeeded. We always aim for some

Re: Packages that failed to build with Python 3.9

2020-05-29 Thread Gwyn Ciesla via devel
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On Friday, May 29, 2020 2:59 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote: > Hello. > > As you might already know, we have recently merged in the Python 3.9 side tag, > despite several builds have not succeeded. We always aim for some compromise > between having the side tag open

Re: Packages that failed to build with Python 3.9

2020-05-29 Thread Richard Shaw
I'm already working on updating freecad to work with VTK 9.0 and hopefully nothing falls apart with Python 3.9 while I'm at it. Thanks, Richard ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Packages that failed to build with Python 3.9

2020-05-29 Thread Miro Hrončok
Hello. As you might already know, we have recently merged in the Python 3.9 side tag, despite several builds have not succeeded. We always aim for some compromise between having the side tag open for too long and having too many failures. The packages, when not rebuilt, are not installable