On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 2:43 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> I guess that has to be another of those "nobody
> can touch this" packages.
Hey, c'mon, Ceph doesn't bite (that badly...)
Seriously though, we do maintain ceph.spec upstream in
http://github.com/ceph/ceph, in coordination with SUSE
My apologies; after closer inspection I see that dpkg is a false
positive. It does match "^Vendor:" but that string occurs inside of a
here-document within a section. Will improve the scripting to only look
for tags when the rpm parser will be outside of section context.
I did fix the other
On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 9:43 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> The packaging guidelines indicate that the following tags must not be
> used:
> Copyright:
> Packager:
> Vendor:
> PreReq:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Tags_and_Sections
>
> I wasn't aware that a
The packaging guidelines indicate that the following tags must not be
used:
Copyright:
Packager:
Vendor:
PreReq:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Tags_and_Sections
I wasn't aware that a package would even build if the first three were
used, but it seems that a few
