Hi,
On Seg, 2015-11-30 at 12:15 +0100, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
wrote:
> On Tuesday, 24 November 2015 at 14:56, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > Switching to packag...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> [...]
> > In this link http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelin
> > es#Pre-Release_packages
On Tuesday, 24 November 2015 at 14:56, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> Switching to packag...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[...]
> In this link
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#Pre-Release_packages
> where we read :
>
> Release Tag for Pre-Release Packages:
>
> 0.%{X}.%{alphatag}%{
On Ter, 2015-11-24 at 08:18 -0500, Jared K. Smith wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 8:47 PM, Sérgio Basto
> wrote:
> > we have two counters, one when upstream change the source
> > other when we rebuild the package, it will be better readable, to
> > understand if the upstream had updates or not
Switching to packag...@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Ter, 2015-11-24 at 01:47 +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Seg, 2015-11-23 at 09:39 +0100, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
> wrote:
> > On Sunday, 22 November 2015 at 00:46, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > > On Sex, 2015-11-20 at 15:18 +0100, Tomas Mraz wrot
On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 8:47 PM, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> we have two counters, one when upstream change the source
> other when we rebuild the package, it will be better readable, to
> understand if the upstream had updates or not.
>
Maybe I'm not understanding you well, but we *do* have two coun
On Seg, 2015-11-23 at 09:39 +0100, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
wrote:
> On Sunday, 22 November 2015 at 00:46, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > On Sex, 2015-11-20 at 15:18 +0100, Tomas Mraz wrote:
> > > On Čt, 2015-11-19 at 20:59 +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > > > On Qua, 2015-11-18 at 17:11 -0600, Jason
On Seg, 2015-11-23 at 09:39 +0100, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
wrote:
> On Sunday, 22 November 2015 at 00:46, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > On Sex, 2015-11-20 at 15:18 +0100, Tomas Mraz wrote:
> > > On Čt, 2015-11-19 at 20:59 +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > > > On Qua, 2015-11-18 at 17:11 -0600, Jason
On Sunday, 22 November 2015 at 00:46, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Sex, 2015-11-20 at 15:18 +0100, Tomas Mraz wrote:
> > On Čt, 2015-11-19 at 20:59 +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > > On Qua, 2015-11-18 at 17:11 -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> > > > > > > > > "SB" == Sérgio Basto writes:
> > > >
>
On Sex, 2015-11-20 at 15:18 +0100, Tomas Mraz wrote:
> On Čt, 2015-11-19 at 20:59 +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > On Qua, 2015-11-18 at 17:11 -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> > > > > > > > "SB" == Sérgio Basto writes:
> > >
> > > SB> When we fix the .spec and don't change the source, we bump
>
On Čt, 2015-11-19 at 20:59 +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Qua, 2015-11-18 at 17:11 -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> > > > > > > "SB" == Sérgio Basto writes:
> >
> > SB> When we fix the .spec and don't change the source, we bump
> > rightmost
> > SB> version, when we change the source, we bum
On Qua, 2015-11-18 at 17:11 -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> > > > > > "SB" == Sérgio Basto writes:
>
> SB> When we fix the .spec and don't change the source, we bump
> rightmost
> SB> version, when we change the source, we bump the left version, so
> we
> SB> can distinguish when we update t
> "SB" == Sérgio Basto writes:
SB> When we fix the .spec and don't change the source, we bump rightmost
SB> version, when we change the source, we bump the left version, so we
SB> can distinguish when we update the source and when we updated the
SB> .spec, this contrast for me is important.
On Sáb, 2015-11-07 at 17:07 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Sat, 7 Nov 2015 17:18:14 +0200, Panu Matilainen wrote:
>
> > Frankly I didn't even realize the 0.rc1.X scheme was against the
> > guidelines since to me this is the (obviously) correct way to do it
> > with
> > predictable pre-relea
13 matches
Mail list logo