Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote:
> From what I know, and what is pratically done, one would name the
> compatibility package "python-sqlalchemy05".
This had been the practice for years until some pedant decided that the dot
was absolutely indispensable. So they changed it.
Kevin Kofler
> Björn 'besser82' Esser writes:
> From what I know, and what is pratically done, one would name the
> compatibility package "python-sqlalchemy05".
Please see the relevant guidelines:
Somehow I completely missed that next line. Thank you for pointing it out.
The docs are correct. Sorry for the noise.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora
On Wed, 2019-01-09 at 18:07 +, jd...@penguincomputing.com wrote:
> From the "Guidelines for Naming Fedora Packages" the example in the
> "Multiple packages with the same base name" section
>
Am Mittwoch, den 09.01.2019, 18:07 + schrieb
jd...@penguincomputing.com:
> From the "Guidelines for Naming Fedora Packages" the example in the
> "Multiple packages with the same base name" section (
>
From the "Guidelines for Naming Fedora Packages" the example in the "Multiple
packages with the same base name" section
(https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Naming?rd=Packaging:NamingGuidelines#Multiple_packages_with_the_same_base_name)
seems to contradict the "Separators" section
