On Sat, Jul 17, 2021 at 7:00 AM Dan Čermák
wrote:
> Otto Urpelainen writes:
>
> I am however unsure what the exact rules are, because I also pushed an
> upgrade of Emacs from 26 to 27 to Fedora 33 and received a few
> complaints there (to my surprise).
>
I guess I am too. I haven't looked at
On 12. 07. 21 13:30, Miro Hrončok wrote:
Hello,
I happen to maintain some applications in Fedora where I am strongly confident
our users would prefer "latest and greatest" over 100 % "stability" of the user
interface and/or results.
For some of them, I've been more or less silently breaking
Otto Urpelainen writes:
*snip*
>
> I wonder if Updates Policy should have general wording that would allow
> you to update this package without asking for exceptions, or at least
> "make it more likely to grant a request"? It does not make much sense to
> disallow client program updates
Miro Hrončok kirjoitti 12.7.2021 klo 14.30:
Hello,
I happen to maintain some applications in Fedora where I am strongly
confident our users would prefer "latest and greatest" over 100 %
"stability" of the user interface and/or results.
For some of them, I've been more or less silently
On Mon, Jul 12, 2021 at 01:30:19PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I happen to maintain some applications in Fedora where I am strongly
> confident our users would prefer "latest and greatest" over 100 %
> "stability" of the user interface and/or results.
>
> For some of them, I've been
Hello,
I happen to maintain some applications in Fedora where I am strongly confident
our users would prefer "latest and greatest" over 100 % "stability" of the user
interface and/or results.
For some of them, I've been more or less silently breaking the Updates Policy
hoping that nothing
