Re: Pidora

2016-02-08 Thread Timotheus Pokorra
> During his DevConf presentation, Ian mentioned that he had to recompile a lot > of the base packages to get it working, so I'm guessing not. His presentation > should be on YouTube by now if you're interested. You might also want to have a look at "Fedora 23 Remix for Pi 2B" [1] by Vaughan.

Re: Pidora

2016-02-08 Thread Solomon Peachy
On Sun, Feb 07, 2016 at 05:52:05PM +0100, Till Maas wrote: > At DevConf I understood that Pidora is dead and the people cannot be > reached. However the new rebuild from Ian is already more awesome (it > contains Ada and Haskell). However, we still need more people interested >

Re: Pidora

2016-02-07 Thread Matthew Miller
On Sat, Feb 06, 2016 at 01:13:57AM -0800, Les Howell wrote: > Don't know if this is the place to ask or not, but I wanted to > use Pidora to do some imaging stuff with OpenCV. Turns out many of the > requisite libraries are not in what I have as the latest image, based > on Fe

Re: Pidora

2016-02-07 Thread Neal Gompa
On Sun, Feb 7, 2016 at 4:05 AM, Matthew Miller <mat...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: > On Sat, Feb 06, 2016 at 01:13:57AM -0800, Les Howell wrote: >> Don't know if this is the place to ask or not, but I wanted to >> use Pidora to do some imaging stuff with Op

Re: Pidora

2016-02-07 Thread Jonathan Lebon
> I'm surprised to hear about Fedora working on the Pi Zero, since > that's an ARMv6 computer. Are we bringing ARMv6 into the fold along > with our ARMv7 and AArch64 support? It'd be pretty cool if we did, > since that would enable support for a very wide range of ARM > computers... During his

Re: Pidora

2016-02-07 Thread Neal Gompa
r to make that official. I don't > think we have enough people interested in doing that -- but if we did > (or do), I agree that it'd be awesome. > Well, we have the koji-shadow instance running AArch64 builds, couldn't we bring in the people from Senaca and the Pi communities want

Re: Pidora

2016-02-07 Thread Matthew Miller
On Sun, Feb 07, 2016 at 04:13:07AM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote: > I'm surprised to hear about Fedora working on the Pi Zero, since > that's an ARMv6 computer. Are we bringing ARMv6 into the fold along > with our ARMv7 and AArch64 support? It'd be pretty cool if we did, > since that would enable

Re: Pidora

2016-02-07 Thread Till Maas
On Sun, Feb 07, 2016 at 11:20:23AM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote: > Well, we have the koji-shadow instance running AArch64 builds, > couldn't we bring in the people from Senaca and the Pi communities > wanting to use Pidora to help support ARMv6 in Fedora and add it as a > target in koji-s

Re: Pidora

2016-02-07 Thread Les Howell
On Sat, 2016-02-06 at 20:33 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Sat, Feb 6, 2016 at 4:13 AM, Les Howell <hlhow...@pacbell.net> > wrote: > > Hi, guys, > > Don't know if this is the place to ask or not, but I wanted > > to > > use Pidora to do some imagin

Re: Pidora

2016-02-07 Thread Les Howell
On Sun, 2016-02-07 at 04:05 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: > general for more on ARM, check out the ARM secondary arch team -- Thanks, Matthew. Regards, Les H -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Pidora

2016-02-06 Thread Les Howell
Hi, guys, Don't know if this is the place to ask or not, but I wanted to use Pidora to do some imaging stuff with OpenCV. Turns out many of the requisite libraries are not in what I have as the latest image, based on Fedora 20 from the looks of the version encoded in both the image

Re: Pidora

2016-02-06 Thread Neal Gompa
On Sat, Feb 6, 2016 at 4:13 AM, Les Howell <hlhow...@pacbell.net> wrote: > Hi, guys, > Don't know if this is the place to ask or not, but I wanted to > use Pidora to do some imaging stuff with OpenCV. Turns out many of the > requisite libraries are not in what I have a