Re: Planning to update to podofo-0.10.1 + review request for podofo-compat for legacy 0.9.x library

2024-01-06 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Fri, Jan 05, 2024 at 05:17:32PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Fri, Jan 05, 2024 at 06:13:58PM +0100, Sandro Mani wrote: > > > > On 05.01.24 17:57, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > > On Sun, Dec 17, 2023 at 04:44:36PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > > > wrote: > > >

Re: Planning to update to podofo-0.10.1 + review request for podofo-compat for legacy 0.9.x library

2024-01-05 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Fri, Jan 05, 2024 at 06:13:58PM +0100, Sandro Mani wrote: > > On 05.01.24 17:57, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > On Sun, Dec 17, 2023 at 04:44:36PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > > On Tue, Aug 15, 2023 at 11:56:56PM +0200, Sandro Mani wrote: > > > > Hi > > > > > > > >

Re: Planning to update to podofo-0.10.1 + review request for podofo-compat for legacy 0.9.x library

2024-01-05 Thread Sandro Mani
On 05.01.24 17:57, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: On Sun, Dec 17, 2023 at 04:44:36PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: On Tue, Aug 15, 2023 at 11:56:56PM +0200, Sandro Mani wrote: Hi I'm planning to update to podofo-0.10.1 in rawhide. I did a series of test builds here [1],

Re: Planning to update to podofo-0.10.1 + review request for podofo-compat for legacy 0.9.x library

2024-01-05 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Sun, Dec 17, 2023 at 04:44:36PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Tue, Aug 15, 2023 at 11:56:56PM +0200, Sandro Mani wrote: > > Hi > > > > I'm planning to update to podofo-0.10.1 in rawhide. I did a series of test > > builds here [1], according to which scribus, vfrnav and pdfsign

Re: Planning to update to podofo-0.10.1 + review request for podofo-compat for legacy 0.9.x library

2023-12-18 Thread Sandro Mani
On 17.12.23 17:44, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: On Tue, Aug 15, 2023 at 11:56:56PM +0200, Sandro Mani wrote: Hi I'm planning to update to podofo-0.10.1 in rawhide. I did a series of test builds here [1], according to which scribus, vfrnav and pdfsign currently do not support

Re: Planning to update to podofo-0.10.1 + review request for podofo-compat for legacy 0.9.x library

2023-12-17 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Tue, Aug 15, 2023 at 11:56:56PM +0200, Sandro Mani wrote: > Hi > > I'm planning to update to podofo-0.10.1 in rawhide. I did a series of test > builds here [1], according to which scribus, vfrnav and pdfsign currently do > not support podofo-0.10.x. To keep these functional, I've prepared a >

Re: Planning to update to podofo-0.10.1 + review request for podofo-compat for legacy 0.9.x library

2023-08-16 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Wed, Aug 16, 2023 at 09:00:34PM +0200, Sandro Mani wrote: > This is now done. Thanks for doing this! kevin signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Re: Planning to update to podofo-0.10.1 + review request for podofo-compat for legacy 0.9.x library

2023-08-16 Thread Sandro Mani
This is now done. Sandro On 15.08.23 23:56, Sandro Mani wrote: Hi I'm planning to update to podofo-0.10.1 in rawhide. I did a series of test builds here [1], according to which scribus, vfrnav and pdfsign currently do not support podofo-0.10.x. To keep these functional, I've prepared a

Re: Planning to update to podofo-0.10.1 + review request for podofo-compat for legacy 0.9.x library

2023-08-15 Thread jani
Sent from my Samsung Galaxy Watch Original message From: Jason Tibbitts j...@tib.bs Date: 16/08/2023 06:58 (GMT+02:00) To: Sandro Mani manisan...@gmail.com Cc: Development discussions related to Fedora devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Subject: Re: Planning to update to

Re: Planning to update to podofo-0.10.1 + review request for podofo-compat for legacy 0.9.x library

2023-08-15 Thread Jason Tibbitts
> Sandro Mani writes: > To keep these functional, I've prepared a podofo-compat package with > the previous 0.9.x library. The review request is here [2]. Happy to > review in exchange. Note that it's not necessary to go through the review process for multiple versions of packages like

Planning to update to podofo-0.10.1 + review request for podofo-compat for legacy 0.9.x library

2023-08-15 Thread Sandro Mani
Hi I'm planning to update to podofo-0.10.1 in rawhide. I did a series of test builds here [1], according to which scribus, vfrnav and pdfsign currently do not support podofo-0.10.x. To keep these functional, I've prepared a podofo-compat package with the previous 0.9.x library. The review