Dne 16.1.2013 21:18, Bill Nottingham napsal(a):
Jaroslav Reznik (jrez...@redhat.com) said:
Yet, it is source level backward compatible with Ruby 1.9.3, so your software
will continue to work.
The updated Ruby also provides better integration with Fedora, especially JRuby.
But not only JRuby,
On Thu, 17 Jan 2013 13:00:33 +0100
Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com wrote:
Yes, everything needs rebuild. It needs rebuild also due to change
from ruby(abi) to ruby(release) we are proposing in guildelines draft
and which was discussed on packaging list (it would need it due to
change in
Dne 17.1.2013 14:13, Kevin Fenzi napsal(a):
On Thu, 17 Jan 2013 13:00:33 +0100
Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com wrote:
Yes, everything needs rebuild. It needs rebuild also due to change
from ruby(abi) to ruby(release) we are proposing in guildelines draft
and which was discussed on packaging
As decided by FESCo on 2012-12-05 meeting, all proposed Features are required
to pass through the community review by announcing them on devel-announce list.
FESCo votes on new features no sooner than a week from the announcement.
= Features/Ruby 2.0.0 =
Jaroslav Reznik (jrez...@redhat.com) said:
Yet, it is source level backward compatible with Ruby 1.9.3, so your software
will continue to work.
The updated Ruby also provides better integration with Fedora, especially
JRuby.
But not only JRuby, it is also one step closer to be prepared
