23.02.2018 13:58 Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>
>
> On 22/02/18 16:47 +0100, Rafal Luzynski wrote:
> >15.02.2018 12:02 Rafal Luzynski wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> 9.02.2018 11:34 Rafal Luzynski wrote:
> >> > [...]
> >> > Please:
> >> > - backport the solution to F26 and F27 as well, this should be much
> >>
On 22/02/18 16:47 +0100, Rafal Luzynski wrote:
15.02.2018 12:02 Rafal Luzynski wrote:
9.02.2018 11:34 Rafal Luzynski wrote:
> [...]
> Please:
> - backport the solution to F26 and F27 as well, this should be much
> easier than in F28 (my pull requests may be helpful),
> - mark my pull request
15.02.2018 12:02 Rafal Luzynski wrote:
>
>
> 9.02.2018 11:34 Rafal Luzynski wrote:
> > [...]
> > Please:
> > - backport the solution to F26 and F27 as well, this should be much
> > easier than in F28 (my pull requests may be helpful),
> > - mark my pull requests as merged/obsolete/whatever is app
9.02.2018 11:34 Rafal Luzynski wrote:
> [...]
> Please:
> - backport the solution to F26 and F27 as well, this should be much
> easier than in F28 (my pull requests may be helpful),
> - mark my pull requests as merged/obsolete/whatever is appropriate,
> - mark the bugzilla tickets as fixed (hopefu
On Fri, Feb 09, 2018 at 03:55:26PM +0100, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> On Friday, 09 February 2018 at 09:50, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 09, 2018 at 09:48:30AM +0100, Rafal Luzynski wrote:
> > > 9.02.2018 08:41 Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Rafal Luzynski wrote:
>
On Friday, 09 February 2018 at 09:50, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 09, 2018 at 09:48:30AM +0100, Rafal Luzynski wrote:
> > 9.02.2018 08:41 Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > Rafal Luzynski wrote:
> > > > Requires: libstdc++.so.6
> > >
> > > That needs to be libstdc++.so.6()(64bit) on x86_
9.02.2018 09:50 Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 09, 2018 at 09:48:30AM +0100, Rafal Luzynski wrote:
> > 9.02.2018 08:41 Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > Rafal Luzynski wrote:
> > > > Requires: libstdc++.so.6
> > >
> > > That needs to be libstdc++.so.6()(64bit) on x86_64 and other 64-bit
>
On Fri, Feb 09, 2018 at 09:48:30AM +0100, Rafal Luzynski wrote:
> 9.02.2018 08:41 Kevin Kofler wrote:
> >
> >
> > Rafal Luzynski wrote:
> > > Requires: libstdc++.so.6
> >
> > That needs to be libstdc++.so.6()(64bit) on x86_64 and other 64-bit multilib
> > architectures though.
>
> I know and this
9.02.2018 08:41 Kevin Kofler wrote:
>
>
> Rafal Luzynski wrote:
> > Requires: libstdc++.so.6
>
> That needs to be libstdc++.so.6()(64bit) on x86_64 and other 64-bit multilib
> architectures though.
I know and this was going to be my next question: what magic
operator to use to generate the correc
Rafal Luzynski wrote:
> Requires: libstdc++.so.6
That needs to be libstdc++.so.6()(64bit) on x86_64 and other 64-bit multilib
architectures though.
Kevin Kofler
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an emai
On 08/02/18 01:31 +0100, Rafal Luzynski wrote:
7.02.2018 14:58 Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 07/02/18 02:09 +0100, Rafal Luzynski wrote:
>[...]
>Also, just to clarify: I still don't know whether it is correct to just
>bump the required version of libstdc++, I just bump it because it has been
>done
7.02.2018 14:58 Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>
> On 07/02/18 02:09 +0100, Rafal Luzynski wrote:
> >[...]
> >Also, just to clarify: I still don't know whether it is correct to just
> >bump the required version of libstdc++, I just bump it because it has been
> >done so many times in the past.
>
> "libstd
On 07/02/18 02:09 +0100, Rafal Luzynski wrote:
Hello,
I have opened 3 pull requests for compat-gcc-34:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/compat-gcc-34/pull-requests
fixing FTBFS errors in 3 currently existing Fedora releases.
Thank you all who helped me with this task. What is the next step
Hello,
I have opened 3 pull requests for compat-gcc-34:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/compat-gcc-34/pull-requests
fixing FTBFS errors in 3 currently existing Fedora releases.
Thank you all who helped me with this task. What is the next step
to make them actually merged? I have not received
14 matches
Mail list logo