On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 09:38:13PM +0100, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> >> Recommends: (other-repo-appstream if (PackageKit or gnome-software))
>
> I wondered that too at one point. But It would lead to a race. The dnf
> .repo files would not be installed yet, and then the
> rpmfusion-*appdata couldn't
2018-01-18 20:21 GMT+01:00 Neal Gompa :
> On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 2:19 PM, Matthew Miller
> wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 01:02:49PM -0600, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
>>> The only way to really do this would be to make rpmfusion-release
>>> require it. However that will mean users have to download
2018-01-18 20:02 GMT+01:00 Dennis Gilmore :
> The only way to really do this would be to make rpmfusion-release
> require it. However that will mean users have to download and install
> two packages to make it all work. That may break things for people who
> intentionally remove gnome-software and
On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 08:47:49PM +0100, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> > > > Recommends: (other-repo-appstream if (PackageKit or gnome-software))
> > Thanks -- I thought so but was too lazy to check at the moment. So the
> > above should do it, right?
> Recommends are not different from Supplements. They
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Thu, 2018-01-18 at 14:34 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 02:21:35PM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > > Does DNF process new Recommends? The -release package could Recommend
> > > it rather than Require it. In fact, couldn't it e
On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 02:21:35PM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > Does DNF process new Recommends? The -release package could Recommend
> > it rather than Require it. In fact, couldn't it even do:
> > Recommends: (other-repo-appstream if (PackageKit or gnome-software))
> It does.
Thanks -- I thought
On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 2:19 PM, Matthew Miller
wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 01:02:49PM -0600, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
>> The only way to really do this would be to make rpmfusion-release
>> require it. However that will mean users have to download and install
>> two packages to make it all work
On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 01:02:49PM -0600, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> The only way to really do this would be to make rpmfusion-release
> require it. However that will mean users have to download and install
> two packages to make it all work. That may break things for people who
> intentionally remove
The only way to really do this would be to make rpmfusion-release
require it. However that will mean users have to download and install
two packages to make it all work. That may break things for people who
intentionally remove gnome-software and PackageKit
Dennis
El mar, 16-01-2018 a las 18:08
Hi Igor,
On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 10:52:50 +0100, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> > to the rpmfusion appstream data spec files. However, based on my
> > understanding of how these things work, this implies that the rpmfusion
> > appstream data packages are pulled into a transaction only if the fedora
> > appst
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Tue, 2018-01-16 at 18:08 +, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> Hello,
>
> We're generating appstream data for rpmfusion packages nowadays to
> enable users to install packages from there using gnome-software and
> friends too.
>
> Is there a way to automa
Hello,
We're generating appstream data for rpmfusion packages nowadays to
enable users to install packages from there using gnome-software and
friends too.
Is there a way to automatically pull in the rpmfusion appstream data
packages? We looked at weak dependencies, specifically backward
dependen
12 matches
Mail list logo
