On 04/03/13 02:51 PM, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
On Thu, 2012-12-06 at 07:06 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2012-12-06 at 15:30 +0100, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
IMHO use of software collections is a symptom of a badly run organisation
not devoting enough cycles to maintain the software it
Hi,
I find it sad that people are still arguing for the developer-oriented I
only care about making application Y as easy to maintain on a wide variety
of platforms as possible, and dismiss sysadmin security concerns as too
inconvenient to follow, at the very same time one of the biggest
I'll interject my thoughts here (speaking just for myself):
I think software collections are a great thing for us to provide
tooling for and make easy for our users/consumers to use.
That said, I don't think Fedora as a distribution should ever ship any
of them. The tools/framework/etc, great.
On Mon, 2013-03-04 at 22:51 +, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
(following up with more thoughts from the distutils-sig thread)
It started here:
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/distutils-sig/2013-February/020030.html
and now we're talking about Software Collections here:
On Thu, 2012-12-06 at 07:06 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2012-12-06 at 15:30 +0100, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
IMHO use of software collections is a symptom of a badly run organisation
not devoting enough cycles to maintain the software it uses, and hoping
(as in wishful thinking) no
Hey,
Just forwarding it here so Python folks don't miss it on the main devel
list.
Thanks,
Mark.
Forwarded Message
From: Mark McLoughlin mar...@redhat.com
Reply-to: Mark McLoughlin mar...@redhat.com
To: Development discussions related to Fedora
- Original Message -
On Thu, 2012-12-06 at 07:06 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2012-12-06 at 15:30 +0100, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
IMHO use of software collections is a symptom of a badly run
organisation
not devoting enough cycles to maintain the software it uses, and
