On Wed, 2020-08-26 at 18:46 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 6:25 PM Michel Alexandre Salim
> wrote:
> >
> > So:
> > F32 has rpmdevtools 8.10, which was first released... over three
> > years
> > ago
> >
> > * Sat Jan 14 2017 Ville Skyttä - 8.10-1
> >
> > The spec in pagure
On Wed, 2020-08-26 at 18:46 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 6:25 PM Michel Alexandre Salim
> wrote:
> >
> > So:
> > F32 has rpmdevtools 8.10, which was first released... over three
> > years
> > ago
> >
> > * Sat Jan 14 2017 Ville Skyttä - 8.10-1
> >
> > The spec in pagure
On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 6:25 PM Michel Alexandre Salim
wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2020-08-26 at 15:16 -0700, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
> > On Wed, 2020-08-26 at 20:23 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > >
> > > I don't really know who maintains `rpmdev-newspec python-foo` but
> > > the
> > > output
> > >
On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 6:25 PM Michel Alexandre Salim
wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2020-08-26 at 15:16 -0700, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
> > On Wed, 2020-08-26 at 20:23 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > >
> > > I don't really know who maintains `rpmdev-newspec python-foo` but
> > > the
> > > output
> > >
On Wed, 2020-08-26 at 15:16 -0700, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
> On Wed, 2020-08-26 at 20:23 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> >
> > I don't really know who maintains `rpmdev-newspec python-foo` but
> > the
> > output
> > (when I run this on Fedora 32) is really severely outdated beyond
> > being
On Wed, 2020-08-26 at 15:16 -0700, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
> On Wed, 2020-08-26 at 20:23 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> >
> > I don't really know who maintains `rpmdev-newspec python-foo` but
> > the
> > output
> > (when I run this on Fedora 32) is really severely outdated beyond
> > being
On Wed, 2020-08-26 at 20:23 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 26. 08. 20 19:59, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
> > Per https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/782, "Forbid
> > %{pythonX_site(lib|arch)}/* in %files" Python packages should not
> > blindly glob contents of the sitelib/sitearch
On Wed, 2020-08-26 at 20:23 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 26. 08. 20 19:59, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
> > Per https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/782, "Forbid
> > %{pythonX_site(lib|arch)}/* in %files" Python packages should not
> > blindly glob contents of the sitelib/sitearch
On 26. 08. 20 19:59, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
Per https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/782, "Forbid
%{pythonX_site(lib|arch)}/* in %files" Python packages should not
blindly glob contents of the sitelib/sitearch directories.
This makes sense, in fact, I just got bit by this
On 26. 08. 20 19:59, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
Per https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/782, "Forbid
%{pythonX_site(lib|arch)}/* in %files" Python packages should not
blindly glob contents of the sitelib/sitearch directories.
This makes sense, in fact, I just got bit by this
Per https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/782, "Forbid
%{pythonX_site(lib|arch)}/* in %files" Python packages should not
blindly glob contents of the sitelib/sitearch directories.
This makes sense, in fact, I just got bit by this packaging python-
sphinx-hoverxref
11 matches
Mail list logo
