Stephen Gallagher wrote:
From my perspective, there are three ways that we could choose to go:
1) Follow the default DNF behavior: Requires: and Recommends: packages
are included on the install media (and therefore also installed
together onto the target system)
+1 to this option
-- Rex
- Original Message -
From: Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com
To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Cc: rel-...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Friday, July 10, 2015 2:05:24 PM
Subject: RPM Weak Dependencies and the install media compose process
(Please keep the conversation
On Fri, 2015-07-10 at 22:53 -0500, Jon wrote:
On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 7:05 AM, Stephen Gallagher
sgall...@redhat.com wrote:
...
From my perspective, there are three ways that we could choose to
go:
1) Follow the default DNF behavior: Requires: and Recommends:
packages
are
On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 8:05 AM, Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com wrote:
(Please keep the conversation on the devel list; I'm CCing it the rel
-eng list to make sure all the relevant people see the initial message)
This past week, the Fedora Packaging Committee approved the use of
weak
(Please keep the conversation on the devel list; I'm CCing it the rel
-eng list to make sure all the relevant people see the initial message)
This past week, the Fedora Packaging Committee approved the use of
weak dependencies in Fedora. What this means is that RPM packages can
now have three
On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 8:05 AM, Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com
wrote:
From my perspective, there are three ways that we could choose to go:
1) Follow the default DNF behavior: Requires: and Recommends: packages
are included on the install media (and therefore also installed
together
On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 7:05 AM, Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com
wrote:
(Please keep the conversation on the devel list; I'm CCing it the rel
-eng list to make sure all the relevant people see the initial message)
Nod, thanks for that!
This past week, the Fedora Packaging Committee
On Fri, 2015-07-10 at 08:20 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
You didn't offer your opinion on which of the three options you think
we should go with. I would offer option 1 is the one we'd pick. It
honors the intentions of the package maintainer the best. Which
would
you choose?
Option 2 is just
On Fri, 2015-07-10 at 08:20 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 8:05 AM, Stephen Gallagher
sgall...@redhat.com wrote:
(Please keep the conversation on the devel list; I'm CCing it the
rel
-eng list to make sure all the relevant people see the initial
message)
This
On Fri, 2015-07-10 at 07:56 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
On Fri, 2015-07-10 at 08:20 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
You didn't offer your opinion on which of the three options you
think
we should go with. I would offer option 1 is the one we'd pick.
It
honors the intentions of the
On Fri, 2015-07-10 at 13:06 -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
On Friday, July 10, 2015 08:05:24 AM Stephen Gallagher wrote:
(Please keep the conversation on the devel list; I'm CCing it the
rel
-eng list to make sure all the relevant people see the initial
message)
This past week, the
On Friday, July 10, 2015 08:05:24 AM Stephen Gallagher wrote:
(Please keep the conversation on the devel list; I'm CCing it the rel
-eng list to make sure all the relevant people see the initial message)
This past week, the Fedora Packaging Committee approved the use of
weak dependencies in
On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 08:05:24AM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
1) Follow the default DNF behavior: Requires: and Recommends: packages
are included on the install media (and therefore also installed
together onto the target system)
Can this have the inverse of the case in #3 (where
On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 5:03 PM, Matthew Miller
mat...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 08:05:24AM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
1) Follow the default DNF behavior: Requires: and Recommends: packages
are included on the install media (and therefore also installed
together
14 matches
Mail list logo
