On 2/18/22 09:21, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 18, 2022 at 3:14 PM Iñaki Ucar wrote:
>>
>> What kind of issues? Aren't they MIT licensed?
>
> Some of them are MIT licensed, some are not, but many do not correctly
> contain license files. I tried listing all the ones that don't in the
> TO
On Fri, Feb 18, 2022 at 3:21 PM Fabio Valentini wrote:
>
> On Fri, Feb 18, 2022 at 3:14 PM Iñaki Ucar wrote:
> >
> > What kind of issues? Aren't they MIT licensed?
>
> Some of them are MIT licensed, some are not, but many do not correctly
> contain license files. I tried listing all the ones that
On Fri, Feb 18, 2022 at 3:14 PM Iñaki Ucar wrote:
>
> What kind of issues? Aren't they MIT licensed?
Some of them are MIT licensed, some are not, but many do not correctly
contain license files. I tried listing all the ones that don't in the
TODO section on the GitHub repo I linked above.
> And
On Fri, 18 Feb 2022 at 14:39, Fabio Valentini wrote:
>
> On Fri, Feb 18, 2022 at 1:36 PM Iñaki Ucar wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > The new version of RStudio [1] now bundles quarto [2], a publishing
> > system written in JavaScript and TypeScript that in turn bund
On Fri, Feb 18, 2022 at 2:30 PM Fabio Valentini wrote:
>
> On Fri, Feb 18, 2022 at 1:36 PM Iñaki Ucar wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > The new version of RStudio [1] now bundles quarto [2], a publishing
> > system written in JavaScript and TypeScript that in turn b
On Fri, Feb 18, 2022 at 1:36 PM Iñaki Ucar wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> The new version of RStudio [1] now bundles quarto [2], a publishing
> system written in JavaScript and TypeScript that in turn bundles Deno
> [3] (runtime written in Rust) and its standard library (this is not
> bi
Hi,
The new version of RStudio [1] now bundles quarto [2], a publishing
system written in JavaScript and TypeScript that in turn bundles Deno
[3] (runtime written in Rust) and its standard library (this is not
binary, but it's tagged independently of Deno at the moment),
deno_dom, and Dart
Great, thanks, I'll take yours!
El jue., 20 feb. 2020 4:01, Jerry James escribió:
> On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 1:17 PM Iñaki Ucar
> wrote:
> > I managed to solve the issue with the Java stack size for the s390x
> > builder. The new koji scratch build succeeded, and now the review
> > should be qui
On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 1:17 PM Iñaki Ucar wrote:
> I managed to solve the issue with the Java stack size for the s390x
> builder. The new koji scratch build succeeded, and now the review
> should be quick and easy:
That's great! I will take the review. If an OCaml review is okay,
would you min
I managed to solve the issue with the Java stack size for the s390x
builder. The new koji scratch build succeeded, and now the review
should be quick and easy:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1803528
Iñaki
On Tue, 18 Feb 2020 at 20:23, Iñaki Ucar wrote:
>
> On Tue, 18 Feb 2020 at 08
On Tue, 18 Feb 2020 at 08:39, Iñaki Ucar wrote:
>
> On Tue, 18 Feb 2020 at 01:11, Jerry James wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, Feb 16, 2020 at 10:06 AM Iñaki Ucar wrote:
> > > If anyone is interested in pushing this forward, I can review
> > > something in exchange. Note that the koji scratch build fails
On Tue, 18 Feb 2020 at 01:11, Jerry James wrote:
>
> On Sun, Feb 16, 2020 at 10:06 AM Iñaki Ucar wrote:
> > If anyone is interested in pushing this forward, I can review
> > something in exchange. Note that the koji scratch build fails on s390x
> > due to a Java stack overflow. Does anyone know w
On Sun, Feb 16, 2020 at 10:06 AM Iñaki Ucar wrote:
> If anyone is interested in pushing this forward, I can review
> something in exchange. Note that the koji scratch build fails on s390x
> due to a Java stack overflow. Does anyone know what's the default in
> that arch and how to increase it?
Yo
Hi all,
There were some efforts to package RStudio in the past [1], but
they're all dead. So following recent work by Dan Čermák for openSUSE
[2], I adapted it for Fedora and submitted it for review:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1803528
If anyone is interested in pushing
On samedi 20 janvier 2018 14:47:20 CET Germano Massullo wrote:
> Hi, any progress on this?
> Best regards
I had a quick look at it, the problem seems t is bndling precompiled binaries
for GWT/Gin/Selenium especially. This is quite a mess to untangle.
2018-01-20 14:57 GMT+01:00 Reindl Harald :
>
>
> Am 20.01.2018 um 14:47 schrieb Germano Massullo:
>>
>> Hi, any progress on this?
>
>
> you likely gain more when you don't lack the context
>
> there is no single message with subject "Rstudio" in
Hi, any progress on this?
Best regards
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Hi all,
I created a copr repo containing RStudio builds, it is partly based on
the spec from Steve. https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/lupinix/R/
Maybe we can get this into official repos later, but first it needs some
testing and also some unbundling would be nice. Right now only RStudio
On 04/03/2016 10:03 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 08:46:12PM -0400, Mukundan Ragavan wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA512
>>
>>
>> I would be glad to put this up for review and maintain the package
>> assuming there is not someone else who
round and found no recipe or rpm for Rstudio.
> >>
> >> I actually just use the upstream RPMs, but I unpack and repack
> >> them to remove some bundled crap and some extraneous Provides:.
> >> Might not even need to do that these days; I haven't checked
> >&
On Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 1:46 AM, Mukundan Ragavan
wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
>
> On 02/29/2016 05:25 PM, Amit Saha wrote:
> >> SG> Hello, I like to have everything on my system in a package.
> >> So, I SG> looked around an
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 02/29/2016 05:25 PM, Amit Saha wrote:
>> SG> Hello, I like to have everything on my system in a package.
>> So, I SG> looked around and found no recipe or rpm for Rstudio.
>>
>> I actually just use the upstream
> SG> Hello, I like to have everything on my system in a package. So, I
> SG> looked around and found no recipe or rpm for Rstudio.
>
> I actually just use the upstream RPMs, but I unpack and repack them to
> remove some bundled crap and some extraneous Provides:. Might
>>>>> "SG" == Steve Grubb writes:
SG> Hello, I like to have everything on my system in a package. So, I
SG> looked around and found no recipe or rpm for Rstudio.
I actually just use the upstream RPMs, but I unpack and repack them to
remove some bundled crap and so
edora because its more
> work
> than I have time for. If anyone else wants to take it from here and submit
> and/or maintain it, feel free.
> http://people.redhat.com/sgrubb/files/Rstudio/
There is also this
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/znmeb/rstudio/
--
Matthew
Hello,
I like to have everything on my system in a package. So, I looked around and
found no recipe or rpm for Rstudio. This is really a shame because every
tutorial on R kinda tells you to install it. Even the Coursera classes in the
Data Science track make you install it and send a
these to be shipped in Fedora, and tweak the build scripts to find them.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> --
>>
>> I'm also working on packaging RStudio. The upstream rpm is an awful
>> crap, automatically generated :(.
>>
>> GWT was
ld scripts to find them.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > --
>
> I'm also working on packaging RStudio. The upstream rpm is an awful
> crap, automatically generated :(.
>
> GWT was packaged by the JPackage project (it's can be a good startpoint)
> and so avail
ind them.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> --
>
> I'm also working on packaging RStudio. The upstream rpm is an awful
> crap, automatically generated :(.
>
I've not even looked at their RPM, I just start off from their compile
instructions. Right now I'm just including the
> The external dependencies (see dependencies/common/install-gwt) are a
> bit troubling. It might take a while to sort this out -- we'd need all
> of these to be shipped in Fedora, and tweak the build scripts to find them.
>
> Regards,
>
> --
I'm also wo
On 03/19/2011 02:34 PM, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
> Hi A.,
> On 03/18/2011 09:50 PM, A. Mani wrote:
>> It is a new R IDE, F14 rpms are not available
>> The external F13 rpm does not work on F14
>> Also it is not in Fedora package database.
>>
>> Compiling from source (on git only) is not an opt
Hi A.,
On 03/18/2011 09:50 PM, A. Mani wrote:
> It is a new R IDE, F14 rpms are not available
> The external F13 rpm does not work on F14
> Also it is not in Fedora package database.
>
> Compiling from source (on git only) is not an option for many potential users.
>
> http://www.rstudio.org
>
> I
It is a new R IDE, F14 rpms are not available
The external F13 rpm does not work on F14
Also it is not in Fedora package database.
Compiling from source (on git only) is not an option for many potential users.
http://www.rstudio.org
I have added it to
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_maint
33 matches
Mail list logo
