Re: %configure broken in Rawhide

2020-06-04 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Thu, Jun 04, 2020 at 10:15:51AM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 04. 06. 20 6:02, Michael Cronenworth wrote: > > On 6/3/20 8:23 PM, Igor Raits wrote: > > > At least it did not break anything than %configure, so the world did > > > not explode:) > > > > It hit at a very unfortunate time. With

Re: %configure broken in Rawhide

2020-06-04 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 04. 06. 20 6:02, Michael Cronenworth wrote: On 6/3/20 8:23 PM, Igor Raits wrote: At least it did not break anything than %configure, so the world did not explode:) It hit at a very unfortunate time. With the reduced data center power it is taking a long time to hit the build root. Two

Re: %configure broken in Rawhide

2020-06-03 Thread Michael Cronenworth
On 6/3/20 8:23 PM, Igor Raits wrote: At least it did not break anything than %configure, so the world did not explode:) It hit at a very unfortunate time. With the reduced data center power it is taking a long time to hit the build root. Two hours and counting... :(

Re: %configure broken in Rawhide

2020-06-03 Thread Igor Raits
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On Thu, 2020-06-04 at 02:58 +0200, Igor Raits wrote: > Uh, this is my fault. Ive tested it, but seems I have tested > something else. > > Not near the computer now, so if somebody can untag it - would be > much > appreciated. I got to my laptop

Re: %configure broken in Rawhide

2020-06-03 Thread Igor Raits
Uh, this is my fault. Ive tested it, but seems I have tested something else. Not near the computer now, so if somebody can untag it - would be much appreciated. Sorry again. On Thu, Jun 4, 2020, 02:07 Orion Poplawski wrote: > On 6/3/20 5:36 PM, Jerry James wrote: > > If koschei is telling you

Re: %configure broken in Rawhide

2020-06-03 Thread Orion Poplawski
On 6/3/20 5:36 PM, Jerry James wrote: If koschei is telling you that your packages are failing to build in Rawhide, it may be because the %configure macro is currently broken: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1843714 Just a heads up. Thanks. Hopefully this gets cleaned up