On Sat, Sep 07, 2013 at 12:17:57AM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 06.09.2013 20:26, schrieb Darryl L. Pierce:
Have your filed a BZ? What's the BZ#?
don't get me wrong but i expect bugs viewable at every single boot
as fixed without a specific report and to be honest not existing
at all by
On Fri, Sep 06, 2013 at 07:07:46PM -0400, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 6:17 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
don't get me wrong but i expect bugs viewable at every single boot
as fixed without a specific report a
http://www.redhat.com/magazine/020jun06/features/bugzilla/
+1
--
Am 06.09.2013 05:21, schrieb Matthew Garrett:
On Fri, Sep 06, 2013 at 12:33:40AM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
whay is Fedora starting with this crap exatly with the
release having a short-minded name with special chars
not properly handeled by the whole OS?
You're sending email to the
On Thu, Sep 05, 2013 at 11:26:39PM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 05.09.2013 23:11, schrieb Darryl L. Pierce:
On Thu, Sep 05, 2013 at 10:11:51PM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
* there is *nothing* in this configuration referring to the release name
/boot/grub2/grub.cfg is generated via the
On Sex, 2013-09-06 at 10:18 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 06.09.2013 05:21, schrieb Matthew Garrett:
On Fri, Sep 06, 2013 at 12:33:40AM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
whay is Fedora starting with this crap exatly with the
release having a short-minded name with special chars
not
Am 06.09.2013 20:26, schrieb Darryl L. Pierce:
On Thu, Sep 05, 2013 at 11:26:39PM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 05.09.2013 23:11, schrieb Darryl L. Pierce:
On Thu, Sep 05, 2013 at 10:11:51PM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
* there is *nothing* in this configuration referring to the release name
Hi
On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 6:17 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
don't get me wrong but i expect bugs viewable at every single boot
as fixed without a specific report a
http://www.redhat.com/magazine/020jun06/features/bugzilla/
Rahul
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Qui, 2013-09-05 at 16:35 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
do we get this annoying wrong display in GRUB fixed
inside the F19 lifetime or *at least* if i remove it
from /boot/grub2/grub.cfg and have only
Fedora (3.10.10-200.fc19.x86_64) get away insist at
*every* kernel update add 19
On Qui, 2013-09-05 at 20:52 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 05.09.2013 20:32, schrieb Sérgio Basto:
On Qui, 2013-09-05 at 16:35 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
do we get this annoying wrong display in GRUB fixed
inside the F19 lifetime or *at least* if i remove it
from /boot/grub2/grub.cfg
On 09/05/2013 02:52 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
so, no whatever macro is repsonsible for this exactly at the release
with a non well thought release name this happens -why in the world
does Fedora again and agin make decisions which are *not* tested and
months before release the impact is known
Am 05.09.2013 22:04, schrieb Przemek Klosowski:
On 09/05/2013 02:52 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
so, no whatever macro is repsonsible for this exactly at the release with a
non well thought release name this
happens -why in the world does Fedora again and agin make decisions which
are *not*
On Thu, Sep 05, 2013 at 10:11:51PM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
* there is *nothing* in this configuration referring to the release name
/boot/grub2/grub.cfg is generated via the grub2-mkconfig script, which
uses settings from /etc/default/grub.
/etc/default/grub uses the content from
Am 05.09.2013 23:11, schrieb Darryl L. Pierce:
On Thu, Sep 05, 2013 at 10:11:51PM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
* there is *nothing* in this configuration referring to the release name
/boot/grub2/grub.cfg is generated via the grub2-mkconfig script, which
uses settings from
On Sep 5, 2013, at 11:26 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
i simply edited /boot/grub2/grub.cfg
and after that i expect *nothing* to add the release name
*but* a lter kernel updates is adding it again
i am using Fedor since Fedora Core 3 and i am maintaining
more than 20
Am 06.09.2013 00:26, schrieb Chris Murphy:
On Sep 5, 2013, at 11:26 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
i simply edited /boot/grub2/grub.cfg
and after that i expect *nothing* to add the release name
*but* a lter kernel updates is adding it again
i am using Fedor since Fedora
Am 05.09.2013 20:32, schrieb Sérgio Basto:
On Qui, 2013-09-05 at 16:35 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
do we get this annoying wrong display in GRUB fixed
inside the F19 lifetime or *at least* if i remove it
from /boot/grub2/grub.cfg and have only
Fedora (3.10.10-200.fc19.x86_64) get away
On Fri, 2013-09-06 at 00:33 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
whay is Fedora starting with this crap exatly with the
release having a short-minded name with special chars
not properly handeled by the whole OS?
I know you're upset Harald, but I would request you to please refrain
from terms such as
On Fri, Sep 06, 2013 at 12:33:40AM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
whay is Fedora starting with this crap exatly with the
release having a short-minded name with special chars
not properly handeled by the whole OS?
You're sending email to the development mailing list, so you're
presumably a
Maybe something like (the incredibly ugly)
http://www.codon.org.uk/~mjg59/tmp/mapping.diff
--
Matthew Garrett | mj...@srcf.ucam.org
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct:
19 matches
Mail list logo
