Re: abrt server report: 20130917

2013-09-17 Thread Dave Jones
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 03:57:55PM +0200, Michal Toman wrote: > In last two weeks these components were crashing the most: > > 1. kernel seen 85925 times (52% of all reports) > https://retrace.fedoraproject.org/faf/problems/1174076/ > https://retrace.fedoraproject.org/faf/problems/120

Re: abrt server report: 20130321

2013-03-21 Thread Harald Hoyer
Am 22.03.2013 03:42, schrieb Orion Poplawski: > So, what to do about things like: > > http://retrace.fedoraproject.org/faf/problems/464418/ > > where the crash occurs in end user code? > > Frame # Function Binary Source Line > 0 Vlarge_mat_vec_mult::__Vconfigure > /ourwork/pr

Re: abrt server report: 20130321

2013-03-21 Thread Orion Poplawski
So, what to do about things like: http://retrace.fedoraproject.org/faf/problems/464418/ where the crash occurs in end user code? Frame # FunctionBinary Source Line 0 Vlarge_mat_vec_mult::__Vconfigure /ourwork/projects/shmuel/DudyTests/Verilator_large_mat_vec_mult/RunOctave/V

Re: abrt server report: 20130321

2013-03-21 Thread Jiri Moskovcak
On 03/21/2013 09:50 PM, Adam Jackson wrote: On Thu, 2013-03-21 at 19:16 +0100, Miloslav Trmač wrote: On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 7:09 PM, Jiri Moskovcak wrote: How are problem reports like this updated? How do I say "I built a Mesa that I think fixes this problem, please change its state to MODIF

Re: abrt server report: 20130321

2013-03-21 Thread Adam Jackson
On Thu, 2013-03-21 at 19:16 +0100, Miloslav Trmač wrote: > On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 7:09 PM, Jiri Moskovcak wrote: > >> How are problem reports like this updated? How do I say "I built a Mesa > >> that I think fixes this problem, please change its state to MODIFIED"? > > > > - the state is synced

Re: abrt server report: 20130321

2013-03-21 Thread Jiri Moskovcak
On 03/21/2013 07:20 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: On Thu, 2013-03-21 at 19:16 +0100, Miloslav Trmač wrote: On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 7:09 PM, Jiri Moskovcak wrote: How are problem reports like this updated? How do I say "I built a Mesa that I think fixes this problem, please change its state to MO

Re: abrt server report: 20130321

2013-03-21 Thread Jiri Moskovcak
On 03/21/2013 07:16 PM, Miloslav Trmač wrote: On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 7:09 PM, Jiri Moskovcak wrote: How are problem reports like this updated? How do I say "I built a Mesa that I think fixes this problem, please change its state to MODIFIED"? - the state is synced with associated bugzilla t

Re: abrt server report: 20130321

2013-03-21 Thread Adam Williamson
On Thu, 2013-03-21 at 19:16 +0100, Miloslav Trmač wrote: > On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 7:09 PM, Jiri Moskovcak wrote: > >> How are problem reports like this updated? How do I say "I built a Mesa > >> that I think fixes this problem, please change its state to MODIFIED"? > > > > - the state is synced

Re: abrt server report: 20130321

2013-03-21 Thread Miloslav Trmač
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 7:09 PM, Jiri Moskovcak wrote: >> How are problem reports like this updated? How do I say "I built a Mesa >> that I think fixes this problem, please change its state to MODIFIED"? > > - the state is synced with associated bugzilla tickets periodically > - if the problem do

Re: abrt server report: 20130321

2013-03-21 Thread Adam Jackson
On Thu, 2013-03-21 at 19:09 +0100, Jiri Moskovcak wrote: > On 03/21/2013 06:30 PM, Adam Jackson wrote: > > On Thu, 2013-03-21 at 16:43 +0100, Richard Marko wrote: > > > >> Not sure, take a look at these: > >> http://retrace.fedoraproject.org/faf/problems/525874/ > >> http://retrace.fedoraproject.or

Re: abrt server report: 20130321

2013-03-21 Thread Jiri Moskovcak
On 03/21/2013 06:30 PM, Adam Jackson wrote: On Thu, 2013-03-21 at 16:43 +0100, Richard Marko wrote: Not sure, take a look at these: http://retrace.fedoraproject.org/faf/problems/525874/ http://retrace.fedoraproject.org/faf/problems/615049/ How are problem reports like this updated? How do I

Re: abrt server report: 20130321

2013-03-21 Thread Adam Jackson
On Thu, 2013-03-21 at 16:43 +0100, Richard Marko wrote: > Not sure, take a look at these: > http://retrace.fedoraproject.org/faf/problems/525874/ > http://retrace.fedoraproject.org/faf/problems/615049/ How are problem reports like this updated? How do I say "I built a Mesa that I think fixes thi

Re: abrt server report: 20130321

2013-03-21 Thread Richard Marko
On 03/21/2013 04:16 PM, Mamoru TASAKA wrote: > Josh Boyer wrote, at 03/21/2013 11:18 PM +9:00: >> On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 10:13 AM, Richard Marko >> wrote: >>> On 03/21/2013 02:50 PM, Richard Marko wrote: >>> >>> In last two weeks these components were crashing the most: >>> >>> 1. kernel seen 454

Re: abrt server report: 20130321

2013-03-21 Thread Mamoru TASAKA
Josh Boyer wrote, at 03/21/2013 11:18 PM +9:00: On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 10:13 AM, Richard Marko wrote: On 03/21/2013 02:50 PM, Richard Marko wrote: In last two weeks these components were crashing the most: 1. kernel seen 45496 times (36% of all reports) http://retrace.fedoraproject.org/

Re: abrt server report: 20130321

2013-03-21 Thread Josh Boyer
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 10:13 AM, Richard Marko wrote: > On 03/21/2013 02:50 PM, Richard Marko wrote: > > In last two weeks these components were crashing the most: > > 1. kernel seen 45496 times (36% of all reports) > http://retrace.fedoraproject.org/faf/problems/586553/ > http://retrace.

Re: abrt server report: 20130321

2013-03-21 Thread Richard Marko
On 03/21/2013 02:50 PM, Richard Marko wrote: > In last two weeks these components were crashing the most: > > 1. kernel seen 45496 times (36% of all reports) > http://retrace.fedoraproject.org/faf/problems/586553/ > http://retrace.fedoraproject.org/faf/problems/258569/ > > 2. xulrunner se

Re: abrt server report: 20121004

2012-10-05 Thread Richard Marko
On 10/05/2012 04:48 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Thu, 2012-10-04 at 11:10 -0400, Dave Jones wrote: > >> > Feature request: >> > Can you do the same backtrace hashing abrt does, and provide a link to any >> > bugs in bugzilla with the abrt_hash in the whiteboard ? >> >> Never mind. It seems yo

Re: abrt server report: 20121004

2012-10-05 Thread Richard Marko
On 10/04/2012 08:13 PM, Dave Jones wrote: > On Thu, Oct 04, 2012 at 11:10:47AM -0400, Dave Jones wrote: > > > > Feature request: > > > Can you do the same backtrace hashing abrt does, and provide a link to > any > > > bugs in bugzilla with the abrt_hash in the whiteboard ? > > > > Never m

Re: abrt server report: 20121004

2012-10-04 Thread Adam Williamson
On Thu, 2012-10-04 at 11:10 -0400, Dave Jones wrote: > > Feature request: > > Can you do the same backtrace hashing abrt does, and provide a link to any > > bugs in bugzilla with the abrt_hash in the whiteboard ? > > Never mind. It seems you do that, and I was looking at reports where no bug >

Re: abrt server report: 20121004

2012-10-04 Thread Dave Jones
On Thu, Oct 04, 2012 at 11:10:47AM -0400, Dave Jones wrote: > > Feature request: > > Can you do the same backtrace hashing abrt does, and provide a link to any > > bugs in bugzilla with the abrt_hash in the whiteboard ? > > Never mind. It seems you do that, and I was looking at reports wh

Re: abrt server report: 20121004

2012-10-04 Thread Richard Marko
On 10/04/2012 05:00 PM, Peter Robinson wrote: > On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 3:52 PM, Richard Marko wrote: >> Hot problems: >> >> ID Components Count >> >> --- >> >> 11834 GConf2

Re: abrt server report: 20121004

2012-10-04 Thread Dave Jones
On Thu, Oct 04, 2012 at 11:02:43AM -0400, Dave Jones wrote: > On Thu, Oct 04, 2012 at 04:52:19PM +0200, Richard Marko wrote: > > > > > kernel 220 ▁▂▄▅▇▇█ > > Nice graphs! > > > What's this about? > > -- > > > > These are

Re: abrt server report: 20121004

2012-10-04 Thread Dave Jones
On Thu, Oct 04, 2012 at 04:52:19PM +0200, Richard Marko wrote: > > kernel 220 ▁▂▄▅▇▇█ Nice graphs! > What's this about? > -- > > These are the statistics generated by ABRT Server deployed on [1]. > > We are going to send these re

Re: abrt server report: 20121004

2012-10-04 Thread Peter Robinson
On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 3:52 PM, Richard Marko wrote: > Hot problems: > > ID Components Count > > --- > > 11834 GConf2 199 > > 11523 control-center

Re: ABRT Server

2012-09-06 Thread Richard Marko
On 09/05/2012 07:47 PM, Dave Jones wrote: > On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 11:39:31AM +0200, Michal Toman wrote: > > > We believe this will help developers to better prioritize their > > work and make debugging easier (crashes in common libraries are > > grouped into a single problem, for each crash ve

Re: ABRT Server

2012-09-05 Thread Matej Cepl
On 05/09/12 19:47, Dave Jones wrote: followed by 3-4 pages of additional spew. Which means somebody has problems with reading comprehension: https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/dev/ref/settings/#debug: DEBUG Default: False A boolean that turns on/off debug mode.

Re: ABRT Server

2012-09-05 Thread Dave Jones
On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 11:39:31AM +0200, Michal Toman wrote: > We believe this will help developers to better prioritize their > work and make debugging easier (crashes in common libraries are > grouped into a single problem, for each crash versions of affected > packages/architectures are li

Re: ABRT Server

2012-09-05 Thread Michal Toman
On 05.09.2012 11:44, J. Randall Owens wrote: On 09/05/2012 02:39 AM, Michal Toman wrote: Greetings everybody! As you may have noticed, new ABRT 2.0.12 has recently been pushed to Fedora. . . . F16, F17, F18,& rawhide? Or just F18& rawhide? Or. . . ? Ohh, sorry - F17, F18 & Rawhide M.

Re: ABRT Server

2012-09-05 Thread J. Randall Owens
On 09/05/2012 02:44 AM, J. Randall Owens wrote: > On 09/05/2012 02:39 AM, Michal Toman wrote: >> Greetings everybody! >> >> As you may have noticed, new ABRT 2.0.12 has recently been pushed to >> Fedora. . . . > > F16, F17, F18, & rawhide? Or just F18 & rawhide? Or. . . ? > Partial self-reply:

Re: ABRT Server

2012-09-05 Thread J. Randall Owens
On 09/05/2012 02:39 AM, Michal Toman wrote: > Greetings everybody! > > As you may have noticed, new ABRT 2.0.12 has recently been pushed to > Fedora. . . . F16, F17, F18, & rawhide? Or just F18 & rawhide? Or. . . ? -- J. Randall Owens | http://www.ghiapet.net/ -- devel mailing list devel@li