On Mon, 10 Dec 2012, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Mon, 2012-12-10 at 13:56 -0800, Richard Vickery wrote:
Fedora don't conduct election business of any sort via email. But since
email is probably the #1 means of communication within the Fedora
project, elections are *publicised* via email (as well
- Original Message -
On Mon, 2012-12-10 at 11:42 -0500, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
- Original Message -
On 12/10/2012 04:31 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
c) how do you define 'contributor' ?
Active fas account...
So cla_done as it's requirement for elections (Board,
On Tue, 11 Dec 2012, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
- Original Message -
On Mon, 2012-12-10 at 11:42 -0500, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
- Original Message -
On 12/10/2012 04:31 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
c) how do you define 'contributor' ?
Active fas account...
So cla_done as it's
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 4:17 AM, Benjamin Lewis ben.le...@benl.co.uk wrote:
There is really no reason why the election messages couldn't go to all
of FAS, and just have a note explaining that you need cla_done to vote.
There is equally no reason, aside from it being more admin work, why you
inode0 wrote:
People working on the elections certainly try to make the community
aware of the elections. Unfortunately we never seem to be able to get
everyone's attention.
One issue is that the voting period is just too short. This time, I found
out about the elections 6-7 minutes after
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 9:58 AM, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote:
inode0 wrote:
People working on the elections certainly try to make the community
aware of the elections. Unfortunately we never seem to be able to get
everyone's attention.
One issue is that the voting period is
On Tue, 11 Dec 2012, inode0 wrote:
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 4:17 AM, Benjamin Lewis ben.le...@benl.co.uk wrote:
There is really no reason why the election messages couldn't go to all
of FAS, and just have a note explaining that you need cla_done to vote.
There is equally no reason, aside from
On Mon, 10 Dec 2012 06:50:59 -0800, Brian C. Lane wrote:
I just saw the Fedora election results, and was surprised to learn there
had been an election. After some digging I figured out what happened.
Robyn sends her announce emails to: announce@, devel-announce@,
test-announce@
I saw the
- Original Message -
I just saw the Fedora election results, and was surprised to learn
there
had been an election. After some digging I figured out what happened.
Robyn sends her announce emails to: announce@, devel-announce@,
test-announce@
I saw the nomination email and the
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 10:10:54AM -0500, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
- Original Message -
I just saw the Fedora election results, and was surprised to learn
there
had been an election. After some digging I figured out what happened.
Robyn sends her announce emails to: announce@,
- Original Message -
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 10:10:54AM -0500, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
- Original Message -
I just saw the Fedora election results, and was surprised to
learn
there
had been an election. After some digging I figured out what
happened.
Robyn
On Mon, 10 Dec 2012 10:20:55 -0500 (EST), Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
I think this is not good - every contributor should be subscribed
to
announce list (with cla_done).
So you're blaming people who didn't recieve the email they expected
on
devel-announce@ for not recieving it?
On 10 December 2012 15:25, Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, 10 Dec 2012 10:20:55 -0500 (EST), Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
I think this is not good - every contributor should be subscribed
to
announce list (with cla_done).
So you're blaming people who didn't recieve
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 8:50 AM, Brian C. Lane b...@redhat.com wrote:
I just saw the Fedora election results, and was surprised to learn there
had been an election. After some digging I figured out what happened.
Robyn sends her announce emails to: announce@, devel-announce@,
test-announce@
On Mon, 10 Dec 2012 15:28:22 +, Ian Malone wrote:
I think this is not good - every contributor should be subscribed
to
announce list (with cla_done).
So you're blaming people who didn't recieve the email they expected
on
devel-announce@ for not recieving it? Seems
On Mon, 10 Dec 2012 09:59:03 -0600, inode0 wrote:
Looks like it was sent to the devel list as well.
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2012-December/174779.html
417 messages in December so far! Too easy to miss the announcement,
if one doesn't pay attention to that list for some
On Mon, 10 Dec 2012 17:02:46 +0100
Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com wrote:
Did anyone claim that? - No.
Years ago I've suggested creating a list where to address all
contributors. One list that would be mandatory to subscribe to.
Not multiple lists.
I fear that has a number of
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 10:25 AM, Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, 10 Dec 2012 09:59:03 -0600, inode0 wrote:
Looks like it was sent to the devel list as well.
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2012-December/174779.html
417 messages in December so far! Too
On 12/10/2012 04:31 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
c) how do you define 'contributor' ?
Active fas account...
JBG
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Or, as another thought:
announce - general announcements for all of fedora
devel-announce - only announcements that have to do with package
maintainers/developers.
and then make sure the announce posts also post to the devel-announce
list, as thats a subset and we want everyone to get those
- Original Message -
On Mon, 10 Dec 2012 09:59:03 -0600, inode0 wrote:
Looks like it was sent to the devel list as well.
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2012-December/174779.html
417 messages in December so far! Too easy to miss the announcement,
if one doesn't
- Original Message -
On 12/10/2012 04:31 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
c) how do you define 'contributor' ?
Active fas account...
So cla_done as it's requirement for elections (Board, FAmSCo) -
at least it should suit elections announcement.
R.
JBG
--
devel mailing list
On 10 December 2012 16:02, Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, 10 Dec 2012 15:28:22 +, Ian Malone wrote:
I think this is not good - every contributor should be subscribed
to
announce list (with cla_done).
So you're blaming people who didn't recieve the email
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 11:35:52AM -0500, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
I really like to see all contributors subscribed to one announce list.
And I was surprised when I realized, after four years in Fedora, that
announce list is optional (maybe I did not
On Mon, 10 Dec 2012 10:33:33 -0600, inode0 wrote:
Looks like it was sent to the devel list as well.
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2012-December/174779.html
417 messages in December so far! Too easy to miss the announcement,
if one doesn't pay attention to that list
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 12:18 PM, Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, 10 Dec 2012 10:33:33 -0600, inode0 wrote:
Looks like it was sent to the devel list as well.
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2012-December/174779.html
417 messages in December so far!
On Mon, 10 Dec 2012 12:55:37 -0600, inode0 wrote:
My recommendation at this point is to guarantee the announcement will
go to the main announce list. You can be sure you will get it if you
subscribe to that. We will also announce it all over the place as we
always do, on various mailing
Brian's comments sound a lot like those that I made to another email group
that I was once part of - email may be awesome for communication, but it is
a truly horrible avenue for conducting parliamentary business of any sort,
the least of which are elections and voting. If there were money
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 08:35:33PM +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Mon, 10 Dec 2012 12:55:37 -0600, inode0 wrote:
My recommendation at this point is to guarantee the announcement will
go to the main announce list. You can be sure you will get
On Mon, 2012-12-10 at 11:42 -0500, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
- Original Message -
On 12/10/2012 04:31 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
c) how do you define 'contributor' ?
Active fas account...
So cla_done as it's requirement for elections (Board, FAmSCo) -
at least it should suit
On Mon, 2012-12-10 at 13:56 -0800, Richard Vickery wrote:
Brian's comments sound a lot like those that I made to another email
group that I was once part of - email may be awesome for
communication, but it is a truly horrible avenue for conducting
parliamentary business of any sort, the least
31 matches
Mail list logo
