On Sun, Oct 07, 2012 at 06:51:26PM +0200, tim.laurid...@gmail.com wrote:
The ultimate software center is a web application, like Google playstore.
+1
Why to waste time creating a desktop app when this could be in the cloud
already. Plus this could be turned into a desktop web app easily,
tim.laurid...@gmail.com píše v Ne 07. 10. 2012 v 18:51 +0200:
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 5:19 PM, Jiri Eischmann eischm...@redhat.com
wrote:
Hi,
the possibility of Software Center in Fedora has already been
discussed
several times, last time a few month ago.
Reindl Harald píše v Ne 07. 10. 2012 v 20:02 +0200:
Am 07.10.2012 19:55, schrieb drago01:
Maybe maybe not. The point is that a fancy software shop would result
into this old mother type of user consider to use fedora.
A user ultimately don't care about packages but about applications.
On Sun, Oct 07, 2012 at 09:32:33PM +0300, Nikos Roussos wrote:
I still haven't understand what it takes to get this started. Besides of
course from having some people dedicating some time on that. Convincing
infrastructure team is the first step? Does this need to get through FESCO
first?
Am 08.10.2012 10:49, schrieb Jiri Eischmann:
Reindl Harald píše v Ne 07. 10. 2012 v 20:02 +0200:
why have we different operating systems and distributions if all
satisfies the same user-base for every price? there is also a need
for a clean and straight forwarded linux without compromises
On 10/08/2012 10:49 AM, Jiri Eischmann wrote:
Reindl Harald píše v Ne 07. 10. 2012 v 20:02 +0200:
Am 07.10.2012 19:55, schrieb drago01:
Maybe maybe not. The point is that a fancy software shop would result
into this old mother type of user consider to use fedora.
A user ultimately don't care
On Mon, 2012-10-08 at 16:49 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 10/08/2012 10:49 AM, Jiri Eischmann wrote:
Reindl Harald píše v Ne 07. 10. 2012 v 20:02 +0200:
Am 07.10.2012 19:55, schrieb drago01:
Maybe maybe not. The point is that a fancy software shop would result
into this old mother type
On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 4:17 PM, Nikos Roussos
comzer...@fedoraproject.orgwrote:
**
On Mon, 2012-10-08 at 16:49 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 10/08/2012 10:49 AM, Jiri Eischmann wrote:
Reindl Harald píše v Ne 07. 10. 2012 v 20:02 +0200:
Am 07.10.2012 19:55, schrieb drago01:
Maybe maybe
On 5 October 2012 15:42, Richard Hughes hughsi...@gmail.com wrote:
On 5 October 2012 16:19, Jiri Eischmann eischm...@redhat.com wrote:
1) Software Center based on PackageKit by Matthias
2) Light Software Center - a new app based on PackageKit from the
beginning
3) Apper already supports
On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 9:49 PM, Stephen John Smoogen smo...@gmail.com wrote:
[...] There needs to be web design, web
application coding, processes for getting applications in and
approved, servers and disk space for this. Those are the hardest part
and it is a blocker because if no one is
On Mon, Oct 08, 2012 at 10:39:21PM +0200, drago01 wrote:
No one but Tim asked for a web based solution. We don't need an
application submission process either, just present the applications
we have in a more usable manner (i.e applications not packages).
The code for a native application
On Mon, 8 Oct 2012 22:39:21 +0200
drago01 drag...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 9:49 PM, Stephen John Smoogen
smo...@gmail.com wrote:
[...] There needs to be web design, web
application coding, processes for getting applications in and
approved, servers and disk space for this.
* Matthew Miller [08/10/2012 23:04] :
Is there more?
You'll need icons, licenses, ratings, reviews and a (much) more detailed
description than the one in the .desktop file. Bonus points if you include
screenshots as well.
Emmanuel
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 11:09 PM, Stephen John Smoogen smo...@gmail.com wrote:
On 8 October 2012 14:39, drago01 drag...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 9:49 PM, Stephen John Smoogen smo...@gmail.com
wrote:
[...] There needs to be web design, web
application coding, processes for
On Mon, Oct 08, 2012 at 11:09:17PM +0200, Emmanuel Seyman wrote:
Is there more?
You'll need icons, licenses, ratings, reviews and a (much) more detailed
description than the one in the .desktop file. Bonus points if you include
screenshots as well.
Oh; yes -- that's an Open Collaboration
On Mon, Oct 08, 2012 at 03:09:38PM -0600, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
Dude.. metadata has to be served from something. It has to be updated
from somewhere.. it has to have some sort of way to get to the client.
That is a web application. The software has to be stored somewhere to
Well, looks
On 8 October 2012 15:09, Stephen John Smoogen smo...@gmail.com wrote:
On 8 October 2012 14:39, drago01 drag...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 9:49 PM, Stephen John Smoogen smo...@gmail.com
wrote:
[...] There needs to be web design, web
application coding, processes for getting
On Mon, Oct 08, 2012 at 11:18:33PM +0200, drago01 wrote:
That is a web application.
No it isn't.
The software has to be stored somewhere to
be gotten from.. and that requires disk space, front end servers, and
other infrastructure.
This is not about a webportal just some files on
On Mon, 8 Oct 2012 18:16:28 -0400
Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Mon, Oct 08, 2012 at 11:18:33PM +0200, drago01 wrote:
That is a web application.
No it isn't.
The software has to be stored somewhere to
be gotten from.. and that requires disk space, front end
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 5:19 PM, Jiri Eischmann eischm...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi,
the possibility of Software Center in Fedora has already been discussed
several times, last time a few month ago.
I read an article about a successful Google Summer of Code project [1]
whose goal was to make
On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 6:51 PM, tim.laurid...@gmail.com
tim.laurid...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 5:19 PM, Jiri Eischmann eischm...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi,
the possibility of Software Center in Fedora has already been discussed
several times, last time a few month ago.
I read an
The ultimate software center is a web application, like Google playstore.
All the rating and commenting and other info, need to be centrally
maintained and it is not a good idea to try to distribute this kind of
metadata.
There shall just be a local installer to install the packages
drago01 drag...@gmail.com wrote:
A user ultimately don't care about packages but about applications.
Other distritors are moving in this direction while we fall behind.
We should lead here like we do in other areas.
+1
I still haven't understand what it takes to get this started. Besides of
Am 07.10.2012 19:55, schrieb drago01:
Maybe maybe not. The point is that a fancy software shop would result
into this old mother type of user consider to use fedora.
A user ultimately don't care about packages but about applications.
Other distritors are moving in this direction while we fall
* Nikos Roussos [07/10/2012 20:41] :
I still haven't understand what it takes to get this started. Besides of
course from having some people dedicating some time on that. Convincing
infrastructure team is the first step? Does this need to get through FESCO
first?
You'll probably want to read
On 5 October 2012 16:19, Jiri Eischmann eischm...@redhat.com wrote:
1) Software Center based on PackageKit by Matthias
2) Light Software Center - a new app based on PackageKit from the
beginning
3) Apper already supports AppStream [2]
Basically, Fedora needs to ship Appstream metadata and
26 matches
Mail list logo
