Re: Are their guidelines for packaging translated man pages?

2011-07-18 Thread Andreas Bierfert
On Mon, 2011-07-18 at 08:57 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: I have a package that supplies translated man pages (only in Ukrainian strangely enough). They are installed by the upstream under: %{_mandir}/uk/man1/ %{_mandir}/uk/man3/ I would use %lang(uk) %{_mandir}/uk/man1/foo.1* in

Re: Are their guidelines for packaging translated man pages?

2011-07-18 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 10:09:21AM +0200, Andreas Bierfert wrote: On Mon, 2011-07-18 at 08:57 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: I have a package that supplies translated man pages (only in Ukrainian strangely enough). They are installed by the upstream under: %{_mandir}/uk/man1/

Re: Are their guidelines for packaging translated man pages?

2011-07-18 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Mon, 18 Jul 2011 09:45:33 +0100, RWMJ (Richard) wrote: On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 10:09:21AM +0200, Andreas Bierfert wrote: On Mon, 2011-07-18 at 08:57 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: I have a package that supplies translated man pages (only in Ukrainian strangely enough). They are

Re: Are their guidelines for packaging translated man pages?

2011-07-18 Thread Ville Skyttä
On 07/18/2011 11:09 AM, Andreas Bierfert wrote: On Mon, 2011-07-18 at 08:57 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: I have a package that supplies translated man pages (only in Ukrainian strangely enough). They are installed by the upstream under: %{_mandir}/uk/man1/ %{_mandir}/uk/man3/ I