On Mon, 2017-08-07 at 15:08 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 2:52 PM, Adam Williamson
> wrote:
> > On Mon, 2017-08-07 at 14:46 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
> > > On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 9:12 AM, Przemek Klosowski
> > >
On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 2:52 PM, Adam Williamson
wrote:
> On Mon, 2017-08-07 at 14:46 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 9:12 AM, Przemek Klosowski
>> wrote:
>> > The release notes for RHEL 7.4 announce that RedHat gave up
On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 1:52 PM, Adam Williamson
wrote:
> Well, no, you're getting cause and effect mixed up, there. RH doesn't
> have btrfs developers on staff *because* RH, over time, has broadly
> come to the conclusion that btrfs isn't the storage tech it wants to
On Mon, 2017-08-07 at 14:46 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 9:12 AM, Przemek Klosowski
> wrote:
> > The release notes for RHEL 7.4 announce that RedHat gave up on btrfs:
> >
> >
On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 9:12 AM, Przemek Klosowski
wrote:
> The release notes for RHEL 7.4 announce that RedHat gave up on btrfs:
>
>
On Sat, Aug 5, 2017 at 10:56 AM, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 5, 2017 at 1:38 PM, Gerald B. Cox wrote:
> >
> > That's all fine and good but features mean nothing if you don't have
> faith
> > in the underlying filesystem.
> > People have been burnt by Btrfs
On Sat, Aug 5, 2017 at 1:38 PM, Gerald B. Cox wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 5, 2017 at 9:58 AM, Neal Gompa wrote:
>>
>>
>> There are plenty of "clever" kernel modules that do bits and pieces of
>> what Btrfs offers.
>>
>> ...there you can leverage all the benefits of
On Sat, Aug 5, 2017 at 9:58 AM, Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> There are plenty of "clever" kernel modules that do bits and pieces of
> what Btrfs offers.
...there you can leverage all the benefits of Btrfs.
>
>
That's all fine and good but features mean nothing if you don't have
On Sat, Aug 05, 2017 at 12:58:15PM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 5, 2017 at 8:12 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 04, 2017 at 06:00:58PM +0200, František Zatloukal wrote:
> >> Some insight why was BTRFS dropped by RH:
> >>
On Sat, Aug 5, 2017 at 8:12 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 04, 2017 at 06:00:58PM +0200, František Zatloukal wrote:
>> Some insight why was BTRFS dropped by RH:
>> https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14907771
>>
>> Also check out Stratis:
>>
On Fri, Aug 04, 2017 at 06:00:58PM +0200, František Zatloukal wrote:
> Some insight why was BTRFS dropped by RH:
> https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14907771
>
> Also check out Stratis:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/StratisStorage
Stratis is a management tool that makes it a bit
On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 7:35 PM, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 04, 2017 at 06:43:51PM +0200, David Sommerseth wrote:
>> On 04/08/17 18:06, Neal Gompa wrote:
>> > On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 11:23 AM, Fernando Nasser
>> > wrote:
>> >> On 2017-08-04 11:12
On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 11:48 AM, Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> I'm not particularly pleased with their decision. I think the path
> they're going down is wrong, and they should really reconsider.
> However, I'm reading over their Stratis whitepaper before I formulate
> a response
On Fri, Aug 04, 2017 at 06:43:51PM +0200, David Sommerseth wrote:
> On 04/08/17 18:06, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 11:23 AM, Fernando Nasser wrote:
> >> On 2017-08-04 11:12 AM, Przemek Klosowski wrote:
> >>
> >> The release notes for RHEL 7.4 announce that
On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 10:18 AM, Richard Hughes wrote:
> On 4 August 2017 at 16:46, Solomon Peachy wrote:
> > ...it fails the most basic requirement of a filesystem -- to not
> > eat data.
>
> Me also; I've tried btfs three times now -- in one case
On 4 August 2017 at 16:46, Solomon Peachy wrote:
> ...it fails the most basic requirement of a filesystem -- to not
> eat data.
Me also; I've tried btfs three times now -- in one case telling me I
had no free space after a few weeks when clearly there was tens GBs
free, one
On 04/08/17 18:06, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 11:23 AM, Fernando Nasser wrote:
>> On 2017-08-04 11:12 AM, Przemek Klosowski wrote:
>>
>> The release notes for RHEL 7.4 announce that RedHat gave up on btrfs:
>>
>>
>> Is it only RHEL?
>>
>> What are other distros
On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 11:23 AM, Fernando Nasser wrote:
> On 2017-08-04 11:12 AM, Przemek Klosowski wrote:
>
> The release notes for RHEL 7.4 announce that RedHat gave up on btrfs:
>
>
> Is it only RHEL?
>
> What are other distros doing?
>
It is only RHEL, but unfortunately
Some insight why was BTRFS dropped by RH:
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14907771
Also check out Stratis:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/StratisStorage
2017-08-04 17:12 GMT+02:00 Przemek Klosowski :
> The release notes for RHEL 7.4 announce that RedHat
On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 11:12 AM, Przemek Klosowski
wrote:
> The release notes for RHEL 7.4 announce that RedHat gave up on btrfs:
>
>
On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 11:12 AM, Przemek Klosowski
wrote:
> The release notes for RHEL 7.4 announce that RedHat gave up on btrfs:
>
>
On Fri, Aug 04, 2017 at 11:12:46AM -0400, Przemek Klosowski wrote:
> This is a pity---BTRFS features looked attractive:
Regardless of the attractiveness of btr's feature sets, the RH
annoucnement is an indication that they don't consider it supportable
for the kinds of users that fork over
On 04/08/17 16:23, Fernando Nasser wrote:
On 2017-08-04 11:12 AM, Przemek Klosowski wrote:
The release notes for RHEL 7.4 announce that RedHat gave up on btrfs:
Is it only RHEL?
Yes, it is only RHEL. It does not have any effect on Fedora, that is
entirely independent,
Steve.
On 2017-08-04 11:12 AM, Przemek Klosowski wrote:
The release notes for RHEL 7.4 announce that RedHat gave up on btrfs:
Is it only RHEL?
What are other distros doing?
24 matches
Mail list logo