On Sun, 2010-12-19 at 11:04 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Sun, 19 Dec 2010 15:32:30 +0100
Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com wrote:
This is due to a flaw in the Fedora PKGNAME-owner aliases and using
them also for EPEL. There are no separate aliases for EPEL package
ownership.
In
On Mon, 20 Dec 2010 09:11:21 -0500
seth vidal skvi...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
should be pretty trivial to implement.
yeah, with a bit of help I figured out how to modify the script that
creates the aliases. Sadly, there's a filtering issue in pkgdb, where
it's not filtering by product
On Sun, 19 Dec 2010 11:24:56 +0100, Ralf wrote:
Hi,
I am mail bombed with mails complaining about broken deps originating
from those EPEL6-versions of packages I maintain in Fedora.
* I am not these packages' maintainer (I maintain them in Fedora, but do
not maintain them in EPEL) -
On Sun, 19 Dec 2010 15:32:30 +0100
Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com wrote:
This is due to a flaw in the Fedora PKGNAME-owner aliases and using
them also for EPEL. There are no separate aliases for EPEL package
ownership.
In pkgdb one can see that there is a different owner for the EPEL
