Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> I miss QtWebKit. :(
>
> For those not familiar with the history, QtWebKit was deleted from the
> upstream WebKit project about three years ago after the maintainers
> said they no longer had the resources to continue maintaining it
> upstream. It now lives on KDE.org
On Fri, 2015-11-06 at 20:07 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> QtWebEngine is definitely the plan for F24. The most likely browser
> candidate (if Konqueror and/or Rekonq don't get a sudden revival of
> upstream
> activity) is probably Qupzilla, which already has experimental
> QtWebEngine
> support,
Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> On Fri, 2015-11-06 at 20:07 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>> QtWebEngine is definitely the plan for F24. The most likely browser
>> candidate (if Konqueror and/or Rekonq don't get a sudden revival of
>> upstream
>> activity) is probably Qupzilla, which already has
Two small corrections about Qupzilla:
I wrote:
> QtWebEngine is definitely the plan for F24. The most likely browser
> candidate (if Konqueror and/or Rekonq don't get a sudden revival of
> upstream activity) is probably Qupzilla, which already has experimental
> QtWebEngine support, and which has
- Original Message -
> On Thu, 2015-11-05 at 09:53 -0600, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> > On Thu, 2015-11-05 at 16:21 +0100, Jos Vos wrote:
> > > I see that the F23 Xfce live image still includes only Midori as the
> > > internet browser, similar to the F22 image.
> >
> > Midori still
On Thu, 05 Nov 2015 10:22:23 -0600
Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-11-05 at 09:53 -0600, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> > On Thu, 2015-11-05 at 16:21 +0100, Jos Vos wrote:
> > > I see that the F23 Xfce live image still includes only Midori as
> > > the internet browser,
On Thu, 2015-11-05 at 09:53 -0600, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-11-05 at 16:21 +0100, Jos Vos wrote:
> > I see that the F23 Xfce live image still includes only Midori as the
> > internet browser, similar to the F22 image.
>
> Midori still depends on an old version of WebKitGTK+, so it
On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 11:35 AM, Kevin Kofler
wrote:
> Jos Vos wrote:
> > I see that the F23 Xfce live image still includes only Midori as the
> > internet browser, similar to the F22 image.
>
> At least one image that is still consistent with its goals in its
>
On Thu, 2015-11-05 at 10:22 -0600, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-11-05 at 09:53 -0600, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> > On Thu, 2015-11-05 at 16:21 +0100, Jos Vos wrote:
> > > I see that the F23 Xfce live image still includes only Midori as
> > > the
> > > internet browser, similar to the F22
Jos Vos wrote:
> I see that the F23 Xfce live image still includes only Midori as the
> internet browser, similar to the F22 image.
At least one image that is still consistent with its goals in its
application choice. The KDE image is now polluted by Firefox, which sticks
out like a sore thumb.
On Thu, 2015-11-05 at 12:23 -0600, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> September: 34 bugs with impact "Visiting a maliciously crafted
> website
> may lead to an unexpected application termination or arbitrary code
> execution" https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT205377
Corrected link:
On Thu, 2015-11-05 at 17:35 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> At least one image that is still consistent with its goals in its
> application choice. The KDE image is now polluted by Firefox, which
> sticks
> out like a sore thumb. :-(
I miss QtWebKit. :(
For those not familiar with the history,
On Thu, 2015-11-05 at 09:37 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> So, in no particular order:
>
> * I don't really think it's 'irresponsible' to ship midori in it's
> current state. It's not ideal, but if you know of specific critical
> issues not fixed, please let me know.
There are two ways to
On Thu, 2015-11-05 at 16:21 +0100, Jos Vos wrote:
> I see that the F23 Xfce live image still includes only Midori as the
> internet browser, similar to the F22 image.
Midori still depends on an old version of WebKitGTK+, so it has not had
any security updates in a long time. It's irresponsible to
14 matches
Mail list logo