On 02/28/2012 09:18 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
Are the same packages going to get automatically rebuilt in rawhide as
well as f17?
Btw, does anybody have a pointer to that ABI breakage in gcc 4.7 for
c++ (i.e., was it an inadvertent breakage, or is there a planned
incompatibility for GCC
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 09:38:58AM +0100, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
On 02/28/2012 09:18 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
Are the same packages going to get automatically rebuilt in rawhide as
well as f17?
Btw, does anybody have a pointer to that ABI breakage in gcc 4.7
for c++ (i.e., was it an
Stephan Bergmann píše v St 29. 02. 2012 v 09:38 +0100:
On 02/28/2012 09:18 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
Are the same packages going to get automatically rebuilt in rawhide as
well as f17?
Btw, does anybody have a pointer to that ABI breakage in gcc 4.7 for
c++ (i.e., was it an inadvertent
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 09:50:06AM +0100, Dan Horák wrote:
Stephan Bergmann píše v St 29. 02. 2012 v 09:38 +0100:
On 02/28/2012 09:18 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
Are the same packages going to get automatically rebuilt in rawhide as
well as f17?
Btw, does anybody have a pointer to
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 2:18 PM, Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote:
Are the same packages going to get automatically rebuilt in rawhide as
well as f17?
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Yes, when they've finished.
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 3:23 PM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 2:18 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
Are the same packages going to get automatically rebuilt in rawhide as
well as f17?
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
