Re: Call for testing: 32-bit AMD CPU owners

On Thu, 2015-09-17 at 12:33 +0300, Alexander Ploumistos wrote: > I tested > https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/23_Alpha_RC2/Server/i386/i > so/Fedora-Server-netinst-i386-23_Alpha.iso > on a dual Athlon MP system and it boots fine to anaconda. > > A little bit later I discovered >

Re: Call for testing: 32-bit AMD CPU owners

I tested https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/23_Alpha_RC2/Server/i386/iso/Fedora-Server-netinst-i386-23_Alpha.iso on a dual Athlon MP system and it boots fine to anaconda. A little bit later I discovered

Re: Call for testing: 32-bit AMD CPU owners

On Wed, 2015-09-16 at 11:29 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > Hi, folks! Thanks for all your feedback on this, folks, and sorry for messing up the links in the original post :) Thanks to all your work we had sufficient information to determine the bug does not need to block the Beta release, so we

Re: Call for testing: 32-bit AMD CPU owners

On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 12:08:15 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: If anyone reading this has an old 32-bit AMD system - the last range of 32-bit AMD CPUs was the Athlon XPs from early 2003, anything 'Athlon 64' or later is 64-bit - and it's not too much trouble, could

Re: Call for testing: 32-bit AMD CPU owners

On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 14:17:13 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote: I have a dual MP system as my main desktop at home. I rebooted it a couple of times this week with rawhide nodebug kernels (the base system is rawhide) and haven't had a problem. It won't boot from flash drives