Re: Complicated problem: kiwi and kiwi-gtk conflict

2017-08-23 Thread Matthew Miller
On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 09:42:29AM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > It's both: http://suse.github.io/kiwi/development/kiwi_from_python.html > It's explicitly designed to be used as a Python module as well as a > command line tool. Ok then. :) -- Matthew Miller Fedora

Re: Complicated problem: kiwi and kiwi-gtk conflict

2017-08-23 Thread Neal Gompa
On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 9:39 AM, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 05:40:27AM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: >> So I submitted a review request on Sunday for python-kiwi[1], which is >> the KIWI appliance image builder tool from SUSE[2] and is registered >> in

Re: Complicated problem: kiwi and kiwi-gtk conflict

2017-08-23 Thread Matthew Miller
On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 05:40:27AM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > So I submitted a review request on Sunday for python-kiwi[1], which is > the KIWI appliance image builder tool from SUSE[2] and is registered > in PyPI as kiwi[3]. Shouldn't this new package just be named "kiwi"? From the docs, it's a

Re: Complicated problem: kiwi and kiwi-gtk conflict

2017-08-23 Thread Neal Gompa
On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 8:58 AM, Haïkel wrote: > 2017-08-23 14:44 GMT+02:00 Miroslav Suchý : >> Dne 23.8.2017 v 11:40 Neal Gompa napsal(a): >>> >>> However, there's a problem. It seems python-kiwi already exists in >>> Fedora[4], and it's the kiwi-gtk

Re: Complicated problem: kiwi and kiwi-gtk conflict

2017-08-23 Thread Haïkel
2017-08-23 14:44 GMT+02:00 Miroslav Suchý : > Dne 23.8.2017 v 11:40 Neal Gompa napsal(a): >> >> However, there's a problem. It seems python-kiwi already exists in >> Fedora[4], and it's the kiwi-gtk framework[5]. >> >> I'm not sure what to do in this scenario. I've requested

Re: Complicated problem: kiwi and kiwi-gtk conflict

2017-08-23 Thread Miroslav Suchý
Dne 23.8.2017 v 11:40 Neal Gompa napsal(a): However, there's a problem. It seems python-kiwi already exists in Fedora[4], and it's the kiwi-gtk framework[5]. I'm not sure what to do in this scenario. I've requested from upstream to rename the module[6], but I don't think they'll go for that,