we are talking about it here
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1964630#c27
On Wed, 2021-08-18 at 17:20 +0200, Iago Rubio wrote:
> I guess this is a bug but on
> https://packager-dashboard.fedoraproject.org/user/orphan there are
> "important" - or at least very used - packages affected
I guess this is a bug but on
https://packager-dashboard.fedoraproject.org/user/orphan there are
"important" - or at least very used - packages affected by this:
java-1.8.0-openjdk depends on orphaned packages
problematic since Aug 11 2021, 10:23:06 UTC
will have trouble on Sep 22 2021,
On Tue, 17 Aug 2021 at 14:15, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 2:08 PM Frank Ch. Eigler wrote:
>>
>>
>> > [...] Eclipse tries to keep up to date with libraries shipped. Quite
>> > often the effort of moving to new versions of a library (e.g. lucene)
>> > requires
On Wed, 18 Aug 2021 at 09:58, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
wrote:
>
> On 18/08/2021 01:32, Mat Booth wrote:
> > Not within the constraints of Fedora's packaging rules.
>
> Bundling is allowed by Fedora's packaging guidelines.
>
Binaries not built from source are not allowed:
On 18/08/2021 01:32, Mat Booth wrote:
Not within the constraints of Fedora's packaging rules.
Bundling is allowed by Fedora's packaging guidelines.
--
Sincerely,
Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org)
___
devel mailing list --
On Tue, 17 Aug 2021 at 13:33, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
wrote:
>
> On 17/08/2021 11:51, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote:
> > Eclipse Flatpak is maintained and updated shortly after upstream Eclipse
> > release by the very same people so for now it's the best integration
> > achievable with given
On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 2:08 PM Frank Ch. Eigler wrote:
>
> > [...] Eclipse tries to keep up to date with libraries shipped. Quite
> > often the effort of moving to new versions of a library (e.g. lucene)
> > requires changes in Eclipse itself
>
> Is this level of backward non-compatibility
On 17/08/2021 11:51, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote:
Eclipse Flatpak is maintained and updated shortly after upstream Eclipse
release by the very same people so for now it's the best integration
achievable with given manpower.
Is it possible to bundle all dependencies into an Eclipse's RPM
> [...] Eclipse tries to keep up to date with libraries shipped. Quite
> often the effort of moving to new versions of a library (e.g. lucene)
> requires changes in Eclipse itself
Is this level of backward non-compatibility typical in Java?
> and Fedora being ahead/behind with versions puts
On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 11:39 AM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel <
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> On 17/08/2021 10:14, Mat Booth wrote:
> > Flatpak system is way less overhead for packagers and ISVs. There
> > should be no surprise at all that maintainers of large applications
> > prefer to
On 17/08/2021 10:14, Mat Booth wrote:
Flatpak system is way less overhead for packagers and ISVs. There
should be no surprise at all that maintainers of large applications
prefer to distribute via Flatpak.
Because they bundle everything inside the Flatpak. I don't like that,
because most of
On Wed, 11 Aug 2021 at 13:20, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
wrote:
>
> On 11/08/2021 12:35, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote:
> > Eclipse IDE and its ancillary packages are orphaned now. As a result the
> > Eclipse IDE will no longer be installable as a package in Fedora 35.
>
> > Red Hat Eclipse Team
>
>
On 8/11/21 1:35 PM, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote:
*snip*
> *List of packages orphaned (all were maintained for the sake of Eclipse
> stack):*
> * eclipse
> * cbi-plugins
> * eclipse-ecf
> * eclipse-egit
> * eclipse-emf
> * eclipse-gef
> * eclipse-jgit
> * eclipse-license
> * eclipse-m2e-core
> *
On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 9:45 PM Frank Ch. Eigler wrote:
> Aleksandar Kurtakov writes:
>
> > List of packages orphaned (all were maintained for the sake of Eclipse
> > stack):
> > * eclipse
> > [...]
>
> Could upstream eclipse make an effort to reduce its dependency
> footprint?
>
Everything is
Aleksandar Kurtakov writes:
> List of packages orphaned (all were maintained for the sake of Eclipse
> stack):
> * eclipse
> [...]
Could upstream eclipse make an effort to reduce its dependency
footprint?
- FChE
___
devel mailing list --
On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 3:20 PM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel <
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> On 11/08/2021 12:35, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote:
> > Eclipse IDE and its ancillary packages are orphaned now. As a result the
> > Eclipse IDE will no longer be installable as a package in Fedora 35.
On 11/08/2021 12:35, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote:
Eclipse IDE and its ancillary packages are orphaned now. As a result the
Eclipse IDE will no longer be installable as a package in Fedora 35.
Red Hat Eclipse Team
Even Red Hat employees can't handle the Java Stack on Fedora. This is so
sad.
17 matches
Mail list logo
