On 20. 1. 2015 at 08:40:30, Colin Walters wrote:
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015, at 06:27 AM, Jan Zelený wrote:
You are probably right, I might have misunderstood what you actually
propose. Does it mean that you actually don't require this part to be
implemented at all and you can go with what's in
On 19. 1. 2015 at 11:30:22, Colin Walters wrote:
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015, at 07:02 AM, Jan Zelený wrote:
I have hard time figuring out what exactly is the purpose of including the
factory reset feature in your proposal. No offense but unless I'm missing
something, it seems to me that you are
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015, at 06:27 AM, Jan Zelený wrote:
You are probably right, I might have misunderstood what you actually propose.
Does it mean that you actually don't require this part to be implemented at
all and you can go with what's in /var without any distribution-wide changes?
On 13. 1. 2015 at 16:41:46, Colin Walters wrote:
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015, at 04:06 PM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
== Scope ==
* Other developers:
*** Use systemd-tmpfiles instead of placing content in /var (TODO:
better docs for this)
Is this a strict dependency or a nice-to-have item?
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015, at 07:02 AM, Jan Zelený wrote:
I have hard time figuring out what exactly is the purpose of including the
factory reset feature in your proposal. No offense but unless I'm missing
something, it seems to me that you are trying to solve some of ostree
problems
in the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 15 Jan 2015 20:49:49 -0500
Colin Walters walt...@verbum.org wrote:
snip
Bear in mind that a dynamic Workstation scenario as you appear to
have primarily in mind is about the last targeted use case. Beyond
the Atomic Host for Docker
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015, at 04:41 PM, Colin Walters wrote:
If it's installing a regular file, then it won't work - the package
(daemon) needs to create it on start.
I filed a bug about this:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1182785
Though I wonder if this should be a Change
Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
= Proposed System Wide Change: RpmOstree - Server side composes and atomic
upgrades =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/RpmOstree
Change owner(s): Colin Walters
I don't see the advantage of supporting this primitive take it or leave it
approach to installing and
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015, at 04:41 PM, Colin Walters wrote:
If it's installing a regular file, then it won't work - the package (daemon)
needs to create it on start.
I filed a bug about this:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1182785
Though I wonder if this should be a Change in
Hi Kevin,
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015, at 05:20 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
* customize your installation by adding/removing packages (and if it were
not prevented, the customizations would not persist across updates),
First of course, while that's accurate for the rpm-ostree technology
today, the
Hi
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 5:20 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
You gain… nothing!
Kevin,
If you are unaware of the gains, ask for it. Image based upgrades are very
common in cloud environments I work with. It is used as alternative to
configuration management in some places and it is incredibly
On Thu, 15 Jan 2015 20:49:49 -0500
Colin Walters walt...@verbum.org wrote:
Hi Kevin,
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015, at 05:20 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
...snip...
* get new updates (including security fixes) as soon as they hit the
mirrors, without waiting for a new OS tree compose (every extra
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 7:32 AM, Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com wrote:
= Proposed System Wide Change: RpmOstree - Server side composes and atomic
upgrades =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/RpmOstree
Change owner(s): Colin Walters walt...@verbum.org
The rpm-ostree [1] tool
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 3:27 PM, Miloslav Trmač m...@redhat.com wrote:
Jaroslav, there is a lot more information on the actual wiki page.
Like the fact that this is only for particular opt-in new installs and
that yum/dnf/RPM can only operate in read-only mode on such installs.
Could you
== Scope ==
* Other developers:
*** Use systemd-tmpfiles instead of placing content in /var (TODO: better
docs
for this)
Is this a strict dependency or a nice-to-have item? That is, are we talking
about having to change all such packages in Fedora (or some specific subset)
within the
Jaroslav, there is a lot more information on the actual wiki page.
Like the fact that this is only for particular opt-in new installs and
that yum/dnf/RPM can only operate in read-only mode on such installs.
Could you resend this with the entirety of the text? It might lead to
fewer
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015, at 04:06 PM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
== Scope ==
* Other developers:
*** Use systemd-tmpfiles instead of placing content in /var (TODO: better
docs
for this)
Is this a strict dependency or a nice-to-have item? That is, are we talking
about having to change all
17 matches
Mail list logo
