On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 10:20 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 12:51 PM, Adam Williamson
> wrote:
>> On Thu, 2018-06-14 at 12:06 +0200, Jan Kurik wrote:
>>> == Scope ==
>>> * Proposal owners:
>>> ** Generate BLS snippets at kernel build time and ship in the kernel
>>> packages.
Also, another question about $BOOT as VFAT, is asking the kdump folks
if they're OK with the proposed change? Because right now kdump
expects to use /boot, which is historically ext4 for a long time now,
for kernel crash files. Or if they're better off writing crash files
somewhere in /var ?
When
On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 8:40 AM, Ondřej Lysoněk wrote:
> I also have a question regarding interoperability with distros which do
> not support BLS. Suppose I install Fedora with BLS enabled and then
> beside that install some distro which doesn't support BLS. The second
> distro will probably
On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 7:27 AM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> On Do, 14.06.18 14:20, Chris Murphy (li...@colorremedies.com) wrote:
>
>> The cited BLS spec is the original one, not the more thoroughly
>> discussed and thought through variant by Matthew Garrett [1] some
>> years ago.
>
> Quite
On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 11:17:50AM -0400, Peter Jones wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 12:40:50PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Thu, 2018-06-14 at 15:10 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 11:51:33AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > > > > ** Have a grubby wrapper for
On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 12:40:50PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2018-06-14 at 15:10 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 11:51:33AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > > > ** Have a grubby wrapper for backward compatbility that manipulates BLS
> > > > files.
> > >
>
Hi,
On 18.6.2018 15:27, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Do, 14.06.18 14:20, Chris Murphy (li...@colorremedies.com) wrote:
>
>> The cited BLS spec is the original one, not the more thoroughly
>> discussed and thought through variant by Matthew Garrett [1] some
>> years ago.
>
> Quite frankly, as
Hi,
On 14.6.2018 12:06, Jan Kurik wrote:
> = Proposed System Wide Change: Make BootLoaderSpec the default =
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/BootLoaderSpecByDefault
>
>
> Owner(s):
> * Javier Martinez Canillas
> * Peter Jones
>
>
> Use BootLoaderSpec fragment files by default to
On Do, 14.06.18 14:20, Chris Murphy (li...@colorremedies.com) wrote:
> The cited BLS spec is the original one, not the more thoroughly
> discussed and thought through variant by Matthew Garrett [1] some
> years ago.
Quite frankly, as one of the authors of the original BLS spec, I can'd
say
On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 12:51 PM, Adam Williamson
wrote:
> On Thu, 2018-06-14 at 12:06 +0200, Jan Kurik wrote:
>> == Scope ==
>> * Proposal owners:
>> ** Generate BLS snippets at kernel build time and ship in the kernel
>> packages.
>> ** Make kernel-install scripts to copy the BLS, kernel and
On Thu, 2018-06-14 at 15:10 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 11:51:33AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > > ** Have a grubby wrapper for backward compatbility that manipulates BLS
> > > files.
> >
> > What exactly is the plan for upgrades, here?
>
> I *assume* it's what
On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 11:51:33AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > ** Have a grubby wrapper for backward compatbility that manipulates BLS
> > files.
> What exactly is the plan for upgrades, here?
I *assume* it's what the "grubby wrapper" is there for?
--
Matthew Miller
Fedora Project
On Thu, 2018-06-14 at 12:06 +0200, Jan Kurik wrote:
> == Scope ==
> * Proposal owners:
> ** Generate BLS snippets at kernel build time and ship in the kernel packages.
> ** Make kernel-install scripts to copy the BLS, kernel and initramfs
> images and do any architecture specific task.
> ** Make
101 - 113 of 113 matches
Mail list logo
