Re: F38 proposal: Minizip renaming (Self-Contained Change proposal)

2022-09-13 Thread Lukas Javorsky
Hi, I've just updated the Fedora change [1] accordingly. Feel free to take another look. [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/MinizipRenaming Lukas On Tue, Sep 6, 2022 at 11:40 AM Lukas Javorsky wrote: > Hi guys, > > Thank you so much for the feedback. > > Let's wrap it up... > > 1)

Re: F38 proposal: Minizip renaming (Self-Contained Change proposal)

2022-09-06 Thread Lukas Javorsky
Hi guys, Thank you so much for the feedback. Let's wrap it up... 1) We will not rename the current "minizip-compat" to "minizip". 2) The Obsolete in the "minizip-ng" package will look like this: "Obsoletes: minizip < 3.0.3" It shouldn't affect the "minizip-compat" because we won't rename that

Re: F38 proposal: Minizip renaming (Self-Contained Change proposal)

2022-08-30 Thread Maxwell G via devel
On 22/08/30 05:57PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Mon, Aug 15, 2022 at 05:04:27PM -0400, Ben Cotton wrote: > > == Detailed Description == > > Upstream has changed the naming of the "minizip" package to > > "minizip-ng" and we should follow their naming so there is no > > confusion about

Re: F38 proposal: Minizip renaming (Self-Contained Change proposal)

2022-08-30 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Mon, Aug 15, 2022 at 05:04:27PM -0400, Ben Cotton wrote: > == Detailed Description == > Upstream has changed the naming of the "minizip" package to > "minizip-ng" and we should follow their naming so there is no > confusion about which package is the right one. Upstream has also > requested to