> "RS" == Richard Shaw writes:
RS> Perhaps this has been discussed before I'm
RS> not aware of it but do we really need to hold up a package because
RS> the submitter needs a sponsor?
Yes, definitely.
RS> Does this make sense?
Yes, it makes a lot of sense. We need to set some minimal limi
On Tue, 22 Nov 2011 13:26:27 -0600, RS (Richard) wrote:
> Also along these lines...
>
> Perhaps this has been discussed before I'm not aware of it but do we
> really need to hold up a package because the submitter needs a
> sponsor?
>
> What I mean by that is, if I'm not misunderstanding the pro
Also along these lines...
Perhaps this has been discussed before I'm not aware of it but do we
really need to hold up a package because the submitter needs a
sponsor?
What I mean by that is, if I'm not misunderstanding the process, that
a person who submits their first package must be sponsored b
