On Sun, 2010-04-11 at 10:33 -0700, Chris Weyl wrote:
On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 2:27 AM, Nicolas Mailhot
nicolas.mail...@laposte.net wrote:
Le dimanche 11 avril 2010 à 10:06 +0400, Peter Lemenkov a écrit :
Hello!
2010/4/10 Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net:
So you are
On Sat, 2010-04-10 at 16:56 +0400, Peter Lemenkov wrote:
I did some investigation, and find a way to completely modularize
whole Erlang package. In a few words - main package consists of purely
virtual 'erlang' package and a dozens of sub-packages (from
erlang-appmon to erlang-xmerl - one
Hello!
2010/4/10 Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net:
So you are proposing a metapackage. Fedora has historically frowned at
metapackages, we prefer to create comps groups to bundle multiple
packages together.
Sorry, but this looks like purely non-technical argument for me (I
mean
Le dimanche 11 avril 2010 à 10:06 +0400, Peter Lemenkov a écrit :
Hello!
2010/4/10 Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net:
So you are proposing a metapackage. Fedora has historically frowned at
metapackages, we prefer to create comps groups to bundle multiple
packages together.
Hi,
2010/4/11 Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com:
Hello!
2010/4/10 Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net:
So you are proposing a metapackage. Fedora has historically frowned at
metapackages, we prefer to create comps groups to bundle multiple
packages together.
Sorry, but this looks
On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 2:27 AM, Nicolas Mailhot
nicolas.mail...@laposte.net wrote:
Le dimanche 11 avril 2010 à 10:06 +0400, Peter Lemenkov a écrit :
Hello!
2010/4/10 Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net:
So you are proposing a metapackage. Fedora has historically frowned at
On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 8:56 AM, Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com wrote:
I did some investigation, and find a way to completely modularize
whole Erlang package.
Sounds great!
Also I'm sure that we need to push this
change into both F-12
I object to this on general principle. Pushing
Le samedi 10 avril 2010 à 16:56 +0400, Peter Lemenkov a écrit :
I did some investigation, and find a way to completely modularize
whole Erlang package. In a few words - main package consists of purely
virtual 'erlang' package and a dozens of sub-packages (from
erlang-appmon to erlang-xmerl -
2010/4/10 Colin Walters walt...@verbum.org:
Also I'm sure that we need to push this
change into both F-12
I object to this on general principle. Pushing sweeping changes to
infrastructure packages is not what stable updates are for.
This update is fully API/ABI compatible with previous
