On Mon, 30 Sep 2013 10:35:33 +0300, Oron Peled wrote:
>
> On Sunday 29 September 2013 21:22:24 Lars Kellogg-Stedman wrote:
> > I went ahead and generated a patch to the Makefile that uses the
> > package version for the library version.
>
> That's wrong, as library versions represent API/ABI cha
On Sun, 29 Sep 2013 12:38:25 -0400, Lars Kellogg-Stedman wrote:
> [...] what the upstream Makefile
> currently produces. I wasn't sure how invasive I should be in terms
> of patching the upstream build process.
The build output is "silent" using '@' command invocations in the Makefile.
Patching
On Sunday 29 September 2013 21:22:24 Lars Kellogg-Stedman wrote:
> I went ahead and generated a patch to the Makefile that uses the
> package version for the library version.
That's wrong, as library versions represent API/ABI changes and
the numbering has different *semantics* than package versi
On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 12:38:25PM -0400, Lars Kellogg-Stedman wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 06:14:30PM +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> > A version-less library is less than ideal, however. How stable is the
> > API/ABI?
>
> Yeah, that's my feeling, too, but that's what the upstream Makefile
On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 06:14:30PM +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> Doesn't look too bad ;) judging based on very brief look at the spec file,
> but it violates the Static Library Packaging Guidelines, and I wonder
> who "owns" %{_datadir}/re?
I've removed the static library and made the package a
On Sun, 29 Sep 2013 11:59:43 -0400, Lars Kellogg-Stedman wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I've just submitted my first package review request to Fedora
> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1013363), which is for
> "libre" (http://www.creytiv.com/re.html). This is a dependency for
> "baresi
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 02:38:40PM +0300, Назар Міштурак wrote:
> Hello, everyone, my name is Nazar. I have just made my first package review
> request(https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823873). The package is
> The Powder Toy game which is very fun. So I want to see it in repo. It is n
On 04/02/2012 10:59 AM, Dmitriy Nikolaev wrote:
> Uups... I'm sorry. OK. I got it. THank you once again for your help
> and explanations.
>
> With best regards.
Happy to help. :)
--
Digimer
Papers and Projects: https://alteeve.com
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://adm
Uups... I'm sorry. OK. I got it. THank you once again for your help
and explanations.
With best regards.
On 2 April 2012 20:56, Digimer wrote:
> On 04/02/2012 10:45 AM, Dmitriy Nikolaev wrote:
>> Thank you for your fast answer.
>> That's interesting. But, could you, please, tell me also, if in t
On 04/02/2012 10:45 AM, Dmitriy Nikolaev wrote:
> Thank you for your fast answer.
> That's interesting. But, could you, please, tell me also, if in the
> future, not now, I would like to participate in kernel developing,
> then is it possible to join those guys?
Please reply to the mailing list. T
On 04/02/2012 10:34 AM, Dmitriy Nikolaev wrote:
> Hello , guys!
>
> I would like to participate in developing Fedora releases(coding,
> mostly in C/C++). Could you tell me, where I can find a source code
> and other relative things, for instance, headers and libraries
> descriptions?
>
> Thank yo
On Tue, 2011-11-29 at 12:32 +0545, Dipesh Acharya wrote:
> view again?
>
> Thank you :)
>
> Dipesh Acharya http://motorscript.com
> http://twitter.com/xtranophilist
>
Ah! No. Not required :)
--
Thanks,
Regards,
Ankur: "FranciscoD"
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha
http://dodoin
Am Dienstag, 29. November 2011, 08:19:14 schrieb Dipesh Acharya:
> I think it makes sense, that is why I wanted to maintain or co-maintain it.
> I can push changes for testing as soon as I modify the extension.
> Also, I would be watching all the bug reports, etc. and would be more
> involved in ma
I think it makes sense, that is why I wanted to maintain or co-maintain it.
I can push changes for testing as soon as I modify the extension.
Also, I would be watching all the bug reports, etc. and would be more
involved in making the extension better.
And how do I apply to be a co-maintainer?
Tha
Am Dienstag, 29. November 2011, 07:47:38 schrieb Dipesh Acharya:
> This is the package
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/gnome-shell-extension-cpu-t
> emperature
>
> It is already being maintained by fab.
>
> Should I post it for review again?
>
> Thank you :)
>
> Dipesh Acharya
This is the package
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/gnome-shell-extension-cpu-temperature
It is already being maintained by fab.
Should I post it for review again?
Thank you :)
Dipesh Acharya
http://motorscript.com
http://twitter.com/xtranophilist
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 6:38
On Tue, 2011-11-29 at 01:58 +0545, Dipesh Acharya wrote:
>
> Hello, this is Dipesh Acharya.
>
> I will be packaging and updating gnome-shell-extension-cpu-
> temperature since I develop it.
>
> Thank you :)
> Dipesh Acharya http://motorscript.com
> http://twitter.com/xtranophilist
>
hey Dipe
17 matches
Mail list logo
