Re: How about firefox 3.6 in Fedora 12 ?

2010-02-01 Thread M A Young
On Mon, 1 Feb 2010, drago01 wrote: On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 9:30 AM, M A Young m.a.yo...@durham.ac.uk wrote: That doesn't work as nicely as perhaps it should because yum downgrade firefox only downgrades firefox and not xulrunner, and as a result the downgraded firefox refuses to run. You

Re: How about firefox 3.6 in Fedora 12 ?

2010-02-01 Thread Mat Booth
On 30 January 2010 22:57, Mike Chambers m...@miketc.net wrote: On Sat, 2010-01-30 at 22:37 +, Mat Booth wrote: Maybe but I agree with Braden: I don't think it's worth it. Seems like a lot of extra work for not a lot of gain. Running a fully updated system, I upgraded to firefox-3.6 in

Re: How about firefox 3.6 in Fedora 12 ?

2010-02-01 Thread James Antill
On Mon, 2010-02-01 at 12:08 +, M A Young wrote: On Mon, 1 Feb 2010, drago01 wrote: On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 9:30 AM, M A Young m.a.yo...@durham.ac.uk wrote: That doesn't work as nicely as perhaps it should because yum downgrade firefox only downgrades firefox and not xulrunner, and

Re: How about firefox 3.6 in Fedora 12 ?

2010-02-01 Thread Gregory Maxwell
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 8:10 AM, Mat Booth fed...@matbooth.co.uk wrote: On 30 January 2010 22:57, Mike Chambers m...@miketc.net wrote: On Sat, 2010-01-30 at 22:37 +, Mat Booth wrote: Maybe but I agree with Braden: I don't think it's worth it. Seems like a lot of extra work for not a lot of

Re: How about firefox 3.6 in Fedora 12 ?

2010-02-01 Thread Mat Booth
On 1 February 2010 19:23, Gregory Maxwell gmaxw...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 8:10 AM, Mat Booth fed...@matbooth.co.uk wrote: On 30 January 2010 22:57, Mike Chambers m...@miketc.net wrote: On Sat, 2010-01-30 at 22:37 +, Mat Booth wrote: Maybe but I agree with Braden: I don't

Re: How about firefox 3.6 in Fedora 12 ?

2010-01-31 Thread Kevin Kofler
Wes Shull wrote: yum --enablerepo=rawhide update firefox NEVER do that!!! You probably have way more Rawhide packages than just Firefox now. At least xulrunner and all the stuff using its unstable API, probably also sqlite and a lot more stuff. Each time your package depends on a newer

Re: How about firefox 3.6 in Fedora 12 ?

2010-01-31 Thread Kevin Kofler
Mail Lists wrote: I think we need to use sun java as green tea is not yet on new api anyway is it? The IcedTea plugin is in Fedora (as java-1.6.0-openjdk-plugin). Fedora does not and will not ship proprietary software such as the Sun Java plugin (from the non-open JDK or JRE). A new

Re: How about firefox 3.6 in Fedora 12 ?

2010-01-31 Thread Kevin Kofler
Frank Murphy wrote: You can update to 3.6 from Rawhide, then disable rawhide again. Which is what I have done, no problems yet. NEVER do that!!! You probably have way more Rawhide packages than just Firefox now. At least xulrunner and all the stuff using its unstable API, probably also

Re: How about firefox 3.6 in Fedora 12 ?

2010-01-31 Thread Wes Shull
On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 1:05 AM, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.atwrote: Wes Shull wrote: yum --enablerepo=rawhide update firefox NEVER do that!!! If you'd taken half a minute to check, you would have seen that it sucks in a grand total of sqlite and xulrunner. Yeehaw. If anything, you

Re: How about firefox 3.6 in Fedora 12 ?

2010-01-31 Thread Christopher Brown
On 31 January 2010 08:14, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote: Christopher Brown wrote: This is because 3.5.7 doesn't affect us. Stability issue is for Windows people and update notification is patched out for obvious reasons.

Re: How about firefox 3.6 in Fedora 12 ?

2010-01-31 Thread M A Young
On Sun, 31 Jan 2010, Wes Shull wrote: On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 1:05 AM, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote: Wes Shull wrote: yum --enablerepo=rawhide update firefox NEVER do that!!! If you'd taken half a minute to check, you would have seen that it sucks in a grand total

Re: How about firefox 3.6 in Fedora 12 ?

2010-01-31 Thread Frank Murphy
On 31/01/10 12:59, M A Young wrote: --snipped-- If you'd taken half a minute to check, you would have seen that it sucks in a grand total of sqlite and xulrunner. Yeehaw. At the moment it does for you, though more updates may be required depending on what you have installed, but you

Re: How about firefox 3.6 in Fedora 12 ?

2010-01-31 Thread Garrett Holmstrom
On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 7:07 AM, Frank Murphy frankl...@gmail.com wrote: True, but if necessary. You can always yum downgrade x Especially if you just need to check out package x. In such scenarios you might find the ``yum history'' command useful since it can easily undo upgrades that include

Re: How about firefox 3.6 in Fedora 12 ?

2010-01-30 Thread Liu Yu Fei Eric
So it doesn't have an official one? On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 3:34 PM, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.atwrote: Liu Yu Fei Eric wrote: I noticed firefox was stuck on 3.5.6 for a rather long time. What about 3.5.7 and the recently 3.6? They are even not in koji.

Re: How about firefox 3.6 in Fedora 12 ?

2010-01-30 Thread Wes Shull
On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 1:42 AM, Liu Yu Fei Eric hoveringnowi...@gmail.comwrote: So it doesn't have an official one? I've been running the f13 build out of rawhide for a week now, and it's worked fine for me... not sure about Java though. yum --enablerepo=rawhide update firefox --wes

Re: How about firefox 3.6 in Fedora 12 ?

2010-01-30 Thread M A Young
On Sat, 30 Jan 2010, Wes Shull wrote: On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 1:42 AM, Liu Yu Fei Eric hoveringnowi...@gmail.com wrote: So it doesn't have an official one? I've been running the f13 build out of rawhide for a week now, and it's worked fine for me...  not sure about Java though. yum

Re: How about firefox 3.6 in Fedora 12 ?

2010-01-30 Thread Braden McDaniel
On Sat, 2010-01-30 at 11:36 -0600, Rex Dieter wrote: Braden McDaniel wrote: On Sat, 2010-01-30 at 14:48 +0800, Liu Yu Fei Eric wrote: Hi, I noticed firefox was stuck on 3.5.6 for a rather long time. What about 3.5.7 and the recently 3.6? They are even not in koji.

Re: How about firefox 3.6 in Fedora 12 ?

2010-01-30 Thread Frank Murphy
On 30/01/10 08:42, Liu Yu Fei Eric wrote: So it doesn't have an official one? Not in F12, but as has been said. You can update to 3.6 from Rawhide, then disable rawhide again. Which is what I have done, no problems yet. -- Regards, Frank Murphy UTF_8 Encoded -- devel mailing list

Re: How about firefox 3.6 in Fedora 12 ?

2010-01-30 Thread Mat Booth
On 30 January 2010 19:00, Mail Lists li...@sapience.com wrote: On 01/30/2010 01:53 PM, Braden McDaniel wrote: On Sat, 2010-01-30 at 11:36 -0600, Rex Dieter wrote: Braden McDaniel wrote: On Sat, 2010-01-30 at 14:48 +0800, Liu Yu Fei Eric wrote: Hi, I noticed firefox was stuck on 3.5.6 for a

Re: How about firefox 3.6 in Fedora 12 ?

2010-01-30 Thread Mail Lists
On 01/30/2010 02:54 PM, Mat Booth wrote: Well there's the Java and Totem plugins at least, but there's a whole slew of apps in Fedora that build against xulrunner: I think we need to use sun java as green tea is not yet on new api anyway is it? repoquery --whatrequires --alldeps

Re: How about firefox 3.6 in Fedora 12 ?

2010-01-30 Thread Mat Booth
On 30 January 2010 20:04, Mail Lists li...@sapience.com wrote: On 01/30/2010 02:54 PM, Mat Booth wrote: Well there's the Java and Totem plugins at least, but there's a whole slew of apps in Fedora that build against xulrunner:  I think we need to use sun java as green tea is not yet on new

Re: How about firefox 3.6 in Fedora 12 ?

2010-01-30 Thread Mail Lists
On 01/30/2010 05:37 PM, Mat Booth wrote: Maybe but I agree with Braden: I don't think it's worth it. Seems like a lot of extra work for not a lot of gain. I much prefer chrome and use it preferentially now anyway ... I'd prefer we put any broswer related energy into chromium - it is

Re: How about firefox 3.6 in Fedora 12 ?

2010-01-29 Thread Kevin Kofler
Liu Yu Fei Eric wrote: I noticed firefox was stuck on 3.5.6 for a rather long time. What about 3.5.7 and the recently 3.6? They are even not in koji. http://blog.famillecollet.com/post/2010/01/22/Firefox-3.6-en Kevin Kofler -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org