... my fault. The package name (and the .spec file) is set to "kpmcore",
while the review request and PackageDB are set to "KPMcore"...
Should I retire in PackageDB and then redo the request package process?
Can I use the same review request by renaming it or I must do a new one?
Il
On 29/11/15 18:18, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Sun, 29 Nov 2015 19:10:25 +0100, Mattia Verga wrote:
Solved by changing .spec file name as set in PackageDB.
The developer himself uses both kpmcore and KPMcore in the project, so I
think there's no problem in adopting KPMcore as name in Fedora.
Solved by changing .spec file name as set in PackageDB.
The developer himself uses both kpmcore and KPMcore in the project, so I
think there's no problem in adopting KPMcore as name in Fedora.
Sorry for the noise.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Sun, 29 Nov 2015 19:10:25 +0100, Mattia Verga wrote:
> Solved by changing .spec file name as set in PackageDB.
>
> The developer himself uses both kpmcore and KPMcore in the project, so I
> think there's no problem in adopting KPMcore as name in Fedora.
>
> Sorry for the noise.
Both
On Sun, 29 Nov 2015 18:50:22 +, Tom Hughes wrote:
> It always used to be the case that the request for a package to be added
> to pkgdb was rejected if the title didn't match,
True. For a long time, reviewers have adjusted the bug title during review
because of that.
> so has a bug been
>
