There was no deflection. You did not post any context and we can't read
your mind.
On Feb 23, 2015 11:16 AM, "poma" wrote:
>
> On 23.02.2015 18:54, Ian Pilcher wrote:
> > On 02/23/2015 11:38 AM, poma wrote:
> >> On 23.02.2015 14:41, Josh Boyer wrote:
> >> ...
> >>> things might still pop up. If y
ok folks, this thread is closed. ;)
kevin
pgp_0xhsi55k6.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
You shout it out,
But I can't hear a word you say
You're talking loud, not saying much
You criticize but all your bullets ricochet
You shoot me down, but I get up
You shoot me down but I won't fall
I am titanium
D.G.
_ __ ____
| | (_)_ __ _ ___ __ | || | / _
Please stop with the off topic, unhelpful stuff.
This is your only warning from one of your moderators.
Thanks!
kevin
pgpzq8sEan92h.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora
Am 23.02.2015 um 19:35 schrieb poma:
On 23.02.2015 19:29, Digimer wrote:
Don't top post Mister Context.
Can we be more civil please?
Can you not spam us with your "PGP SIGNED MESSAGE", please?
IT IS ENOUGH
just because *you* can't install GPG you call other posts "spam" while
the only sp
On 23.02.2015 19:29, Digimer wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 23/02/15 01:23 PM, poma wrote:
>> On 23.02.2015 19:22, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>>> There was no deflection. You did not post any context and we
>>> can't read your mind. On Feb 23, 2015 11:16 AM, "poma
Am 23.02.2015 um 19:23 schrieb poma:
On 23.02.2015 19:22, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
Don't deflect.
There was no deflection. You gave no context and we can't read your mind.
Either post more context in what you want or expect a lot of missed guesses
on what you inferred
For proprietary and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 23/02/15 01:23 PM, poma wrote:
> On 23.02.2015 19:22, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>> There was no deflection. You did not post any context and we
>> can't read your mind. On Feb 23, 2015 11:16 AM, "poma"
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 23.02.2015 18:54, Ian
On 23.02.2015 19:22, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> There was no deflection. You did not post any context and we can't read
> your mind.
> On Feb 23, 2015 11:16 AM, "poma" wrote:
>>
>> On 23.02.2015 18:54, Ian Pilcher wrote:
>>> On 02/23/2015 11:38 AM, poma wrote:
On 23.02.2015 14:41, Josh Boy
On 23.02.2015 18:54, Ian Pilcher wrote:
> On 02/23/2015 11:38 AM, poma wrote:
>> On 23.02.2015 14:41, Josh Boyer wrote:
>> ...
>>> things might still pop up. If you are using out of tree drivers
>>> (vbox, nvidia) you might want to pay extra attention.
>>
>>
>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Forbi
Am 23.02.2015 um 18:38 schrieb poma:
On 23.02.2015 14:41, Josh Boyer wrote:
...
things might still pop up. If you are using out of tree drivers
(vbox, nvidia) you might want to pay extra attention.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Forbidden_items?rd=ForbiddenItems#NVIDIA_Proprietary_Graphics_
On 02/23/2015 11:38 AM, poma wrote:
On 23.02.2015 14:41, Josh Boyer wrote:
...
things might still pop up. If you are using out of tree drivers
(vbox, nvidia) you might want to pay extra attention.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Forbidden_items?rd=ForbiddenItems#NVIDIA_Proprietary_Graphics_Dr
On 23.02.2015 14:41, Josh Boyer wrote:
...
> things might still pop up. If you are using out of tree drivers
> (vbox, nvidia) you might want to pay extra attention.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Forbidden_items?rd=ForbiddenItems#NVIDIA_Proprietary_Graphics_Drivers
_ __
13 matches
Mail list logo
