Re: Missing font information at wiki

On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 09:36:44PM +, Richard Hughes wrote: > On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 9:33 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > wrote: > > I'd try to write a page generator that'd turn appdata files into > > html. Might be useful for more than fonts. > >

Re: Missing font information at wiki

> > > > > I'd try to write a page generator that'd turn appdata files into > > html. Might be useful for more than fonts. That doesn't even seem > > like that much work, to write such a script and have it run once a > > week and update the html for all updated packages and push it out to > > a

Re: Missing font information at wiki

Hi, fedora-packages is already using the appdata to get the icons of the applications. The indexing of the search database is fetching an xml file [1] that contains the appdata but I am not sure how this file is actually produced. [1] :

Re: Missing font information at wiki

On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 11:05:10PM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 4:33 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 08:34:35PM +, Will Crawford wrote: > >> On 23 November 2017 at 13:55, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > >>

Re: Missing font information at wiki

On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 3:03 AM, Richard Hughes wrote: > Usually it's because the font does something crazy and can't be > rendered by pango-cairo correctly. The "generate a PNG from a TTF" > functionality is a hair-raising mixture of cairo, pango, freetype2 and > fontconfig.

Re: Missing font information at wiki

On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 7:25 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > I think we should consider getting rid of this requirement. Updating > wiki pages is quite a bit of work, and we have better mechanisms to > advertise stuff to users that didn't exist a few years ago. Apart

Re: Missing font information at wiki

On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 4:33 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 08:34:35PM +, Will Crawford wrote: >> On 23 November 2017 at 13:55, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek >> wrote: >> [...] >> > I think we should consider getting rid

Re: Missing font information at wiki

On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 8:07 PM, Richard Hughes wrote: > We fixed the emoji font generation yesterday by chance: > https://github.com/hughsie/appstream-glib/commit/7e597065a8024743dde63354355388e7ac7f9855 maybe good to have one for math? which is und-zmth. > >> Also, most

Re: Missing font information at wiki

On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 08:34:35PM +, Will Crawford wrote: > On 23 November 2017 at 13:55, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > wrote: > [...] > > I think we should consider getting rid of this requirement. Updating > > wiki pages is quite a bit of work, and we have better

Re: Missing font information at wiki

On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 02:37:56PM +, Richard Hughes wrote: > On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 1:55 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > wrote: > > I attached a screenshot from gnome-software-3.26.1-3.fc27.x86_64 for a > > random font. This _is_ already pretty good, but it'd be nice to

Re: Missing font information at wiki

On 23 November 2017 at 20:34, Will Crawford wrote: > There are still some dinosaurs who don't use GNOME. AppStream is a cross distro and cross desktop specification. It's used by Muon, Discover and Apper on KDE, AppCenter on Elementary OS and also desktop neutral

Re: Missing font information at wiki

On 23 November 2017 at 13:55, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: [...] > I think we should consider getting rid of this requirement. Updating > wiki pages is quite a bit of work, and we have better mechanisms to > advertise stuff to users that didn't exist a few years ago.

Re: Missing font information at wiki

On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 04:16:27PM +0530, Akira TAGOH wrote: > On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 3:31 AM, Matthew Miller > wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 03:44:05PM +0530, Akira TAGOH wrote: > >> All of fonts is supposed to have an information page for their fonts > >> at wiki

Re: Missing font information at wiki

On Thu, Nov 23, 2017, at 11:46 AM, Akira TAGOH wrote: > On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 3:31 AM, Matthew Miller > wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 03:44:05PM +0530, Akira TAGOH wrote: > >> All of fonts is supposed to have an information page for their > >> fonts> >> at wiki

Re: Missing font information at wiki

On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 3:31 AM, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 03:44:05PM +0530, Akira TAGOH wrote: >> All of fonts is supposed to have an information page for their fonts >> at wiki based on the template[1] according to the package >> lifecycle[2].

Re: Missing font information at wiki

On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 03:44:05PM +0530, Akira TAGOH wrote: > All of fonts is supposed to have an information page for their fonts > at wiki based on the template[1] according to the package > lifecycle[2]. however some of them doesn't have. so just tried to pick > them up and inform you to get

Re: Missing font information at wiki

On 11/21/2017 11:14 AM, Akira TAGOH wrote: > zdohnal ghostscript-fonts > ghostscript-fonts is deprecated by urw-fonts and urw-base35-fonts in Fedora 27+ and is going to be retired for them, so I won't create wiki page for it. -- Zdenek Dohnal Associate Software Engineer Red Hat Czech -

Re: Missing font information at wiki

On Tuesday, 21 November 2017 at 11:14, Akira TAGOH wrote: > Hi, > > All of fonts is supposed to have an information page for their fonts > at wiki based on the template[1] according to the package > lifecycle[2]. however some of them doesn't have. so just tried to pick > them up and inform you to