Re: Orphaning packages (was LibreOffice packages)

Am 03.07.23 um 18:07 schrieb Simon de Vlieger: On 7/3/23 13:46, Ralf Corsépius wrote: It is the core of the problem esp. big US companies tend to ignore. May-be you guys are not aware of there are tendencies to legally prohibit such "cloud solutions" in many countries? It's generally not

Re: Orphaning packages (was LibreOffice packages)

On 7/3/23 13:46, Ralf Corsépius wrote: It is the core of the problem esp. big US companies tend to ignore. May-be you guys are not aware of there are tendencies to legally prohibit such "cloud solutions" in many countries? It's generally not so much 'legally prohibit' as 'data has to be

Re: Orphaning packages (was LibreOffice packages)

Am 01.07.23 um 14:28 schrieb Peter Robinson: On Sat, Jul 1, 2023 at 12:50 PM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: On 01/07/2023 13:36, Chris Adams wrote: A lot of the corporate world has gone to the "cloud" don't have to worry about local backups of important documents and spreadsheets, they

Re: Orphaning packages (was LibreOffice packages)

On 7/3/23 09:23, Victor Toso wrote: On Sat, Jul 01, 2023 at 10:09:15PM +0200, Kalev Lember wrote: Victor (CC'd), do you want to pick up grilo and grilo-plugins? Sure, I'll keep maintaining both in Fedora. Excellent! Can you click on the "Take" button at

Re: Orphaning packages (was LibreOffice packages)

Peter Robinson wrote: > Someone doing work in EPEL is quite a bit different to my point of a > corporate organisation downstream of RHEL adding value and > differentiation that Red Hat doesn't provide as part of RHEL. The discussion was about people being able or unable to obtain the LibreOffice

Re: Orphaning packages (was LibreOffice packages)

On Sun, Jul 2, 2023 at 10:27 PM Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: > > Peter Robinson wrote: > > Assuming those "binary compatible distributions" choose to add > > LibreOffice back in and support it, given what they actually do in > > terms of actual development it's actually pretty unlikely they're >

Re: Orphaning packages (was LibreOffice packages)

Peter Robinson wrote: > Assuming those "binary compatible distributions" choose to add > LibreOffice back in and support it, given what they actually do in > terms of actual development it's actually pretty unlikely they're > going to do all the extra work to add back an office suite and all the >

Re: Orphaning packages (was LibreOffice packages)

On Fri, Jun 30 2023 at 05:40:33 AM +0200, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: So Red Hat is essentially killing all work on desktop packages, not just on LibreOffice? No. Losing Bastien is extremely unfortunate and demoralizing, but we are not killing all work on desktop packages. Michael

Re: Orphaning packages (was LibreOffice packages)

On Sun, Jul 2, 2023 at 11:01 AM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > > On 02/07/2023 10:51, Simon de Vlieger wrote: > > The suppliers for these enterprise distributions and the support they > > offer also abide by political lines. > > Indeed. That's why having RHEL repacks (Alma, Rocky, Oracle

Re: Orphaning packages (was LibreOffice packages)

On 02/07/2023 10:51, Simon de Vlieger wrote: The suppliers for these enterprise distributions and the support they offer also abide by political lines. Indeed. That's why having RHEL repacks (Alma, Rocky, Oracle Linux) is good. While your data won't be gone in an instant you still end up in

Re: Orphaning packages (was LibreOffice packages)

On 7/2/23 08:56, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: On 01/07/2023 14:28, Peter Robinson wrote: This sort of comment is off topic, various companies are free to do with their data as they wish, just as you are free to do with it as you please. This is not offtopic. What I mean is that a

Re: Orphaning packages (was LibreOffice packages)

On 01/07/2023 14:28, Peter Robinson wrote: This sort of comment is off topic, various companies are free to do with their data as they wish, just as you are free to do with it as you please. This is not offtopic. What I mean is that a distribution targeted at enterprise use should have a

Re: Orphaning packages (was LibreOffice packages)

On Jun 29, 2023, at 7:47 AM, Bastien Nocera wrote: > Here is a list of Fedora packages which I maintained or co-maintained which I > won't be able to contribute to anymore: > > sloccount I grabbed sloccount as I’ve found it useful over the years. It looks the right level of incredibly low

Re: Orphaning packages (was LibreOffice packages)

On 6/29/23 16:47, Bastien Nocera wrote: Hello, As part of the same process outlined in Matthias Clasen's "LibreOffice packages" email, my upstream and downstream work on desktop Bluetooth, multimedia applications (namely totem, rhythmbox and sound-juicer) and libfprint/fprintd is being

Re: Orphaning packages (was LibreOffice packages)

Am 01.07.23 um 14:28 schrieb Peter Robinson: On Sat, Jul 1, 2023 at 12:50 PM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: On 01/07/2023 13:36, Chris Adams wrote: A lot of the corporate world has gone to the "cloud" don't have to worry about local backups of important documents and spreadsheets, they

Re: Orphaning packages (was LibreOffice packages)

On Sat, Jul 1, 2023 at 12:50 PM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > > On 01/07/2023 13:36, Chris Adams wrote: > > A lot of the corporate world has gone to the "cloud" > > > don't have to worry about local backups of important documents and > > spreadsheets, they get sharing with minimal effort,

Re: Orphaning packages (was LibreOffice packages)

On 01/07/2023 13:36, Chris Adams wrote: A lot of the corporate world has gone to the "cloud" don't have to worry about local backups of important documents and spreadsheets, they get sharing with minimal effort, they can access things from their mobile devices, etc. And voluntarily hand

Re: Orphaning packages (was LibreOffice packages)

Once upon a time, Kevin Kofler said: > Peter Robinson wrote: > > I would hardly say Libreoffice, bluetooth on the desktop and certain > > iDevice pieces is "killing all work on the desktop" it's more focusing > > on things that are important to their customers in those contexts. > > What

Re: Orphaning packages (was LibreOffice packages)

On Sat, Jul 1, 2023 at 12:30 PM Peter Robinson wrote: > > On Sat, Jul 1, 2023 at 12:00 AM Kevin Kofler via devel > wrote: > > > > Peter Robinson wrote: > > > I would hardly say Libreoffice, bluetooth on the desktop and certain > > > iDevice pieces is "killing all work on the desktop" it's more

Re: Orphaning packages (was LibreOffice packages)

On Sat, Jul 1, 2023 at 12:00 AM Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: > > Peter Robinson wrote: > > I would hardly say Libreoffice, bluetooth on the desktop and certain > > iDevice pieces is "killing all work on the desktop" it's more focusing > > on things that are important to their customers in those

Re: Orphaning packages (was LibreOffice packages)

On 29/06/2023 16:47, Bastien Nocera wrote: Hello, As part of the same process outlined in Matthias Clasen's "LibreOffice packages" email, my upstream and downstream work on desktop Bluetooth, multimedia applications (namely totem, rhythmbox and sound-juicer) and libfprint/fprintd is being

Re: Orphaning packages (was LibreOffice packages)

On Sat, Jul 1, 2023 at 1:00 AM Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: > > What corporate desktop customers do not use LibreOffice? I know two big-name scientific instrument manufacturers that offer RHEL workstations on which to run the control software. I suspect there are other domains with similar use

Re: Orphaning packages (was LibreOffice packages)

Peter Robinson wrote: > I would hardly say Libreoffice, bluetooth on the desktop and certain > iDevice pieces is "killing all work on the desktop" it's more focusing > on things that are important to their customers in those contexts. What corporate desktop customers do not use LibreOffice? If RH

Re: Orphaning packages (was LibreOffice packages)

On Fri, Jun 30, 2023 at 4:41 AM Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: > > Bastien Nocera wrote: > > As part of the same process outlined in Matthias Clasen's "LibreOffice > > packages" email, my upstream and downstream work on desktop Bluetooth, > > multimedia applications (namely totem, rhythmbox and

Re: Orphaning packages

On 30/06/2023 00:09, crissdell wrote: Hi, i'm really interested in maintaining this rpms, jdns and git-subrepo, but i'm not an packager yet, I really appreciate if someone is willing to mentor me, I dont want to mess it up.

Re: Orphaning packages (was LibreOffice packages)

Bastien Nocera wrote: > As part of the same process outlined in Matthias Clasen's "LibreOffice > packages" email, my upstream and downstream work on desktop Bluetooth, > multimedia applications (namely totem, rhythmbox and sound-juicer) and > libfprint/fprintd is being stopped, and all the rest of

Re: Orphaning packages

Hi, i'm really interested in maintaining this rpms, jdns and git-subrepo, but i'm not an packager yet, I really appreciate if someone is willing to mentor me, I dont want to mess it up. Thanks for your time Sincerely Cristian Delgado --- Original Message --- On Friday, June 23rd,

Re: Orphaning packages (was LibreOffice packages)

On 2023-06-29 18:09, Bastien Nocera wrote: Do you want to pick up the rest of the libimobiledevice stack as well? That's ifuse, libplist, libusbmuxd and usbmuxd. I've just picked these up, thanks! Will work together with Neal on this stack as part of the Fedora Asahi SIG. Cheers Davide

Re: Orphaning packages (was LibreOffice packages)

Do you want to pick up the rest of the libimobiledevice stack as well? That's ifuse, libplist, libusbmuxd and usbmuxd. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora

Re: Orphaning packages (was LibreOffice packages)

On Thu, 29 Jun 2023 at 10:48, Bastien Nocera wrote: > Hello, > > As part of the same process outlined in Matthias Clasen's "LibreOffice > packages" email, my upstream and downstream work on desktop Bluetooth, > multimedia applications (namely totem, rhythmbox and sound-juicer) and >

Re: Orphaning packages (was LibreOffice packages)

I've picked up low-memory-monitor On 6/29/23 08:46, Neal Gompa wrote: On Thu, Jun 29, 2023 at 10:48 AM Bastien Nocera wrote: Hello, As part of the same process outlined in Matthias Clasen's "LibreOffice packages" email, my upstream and downstream work on desktop Bluetooth, multimedia

Re: Orphaning packages (was LibreOffice packages)

On Thu, Jun 29, 2023 at 10:48 AM Bastien Nocera wrote: > > Hello, > > As part of the same process outlined in Matthias Clasen's "LibreOffice > packages" email, my upstream and downstream work on desktop Bluetooth, > multimedia applications (namely totem, rhythmbox and sound-juicer) and >

[EPEL-devel] Re: Orphaning packages

Lance, I can sponsor/mentor you. I'll reach out to ya via Mattermost. On Tue, Jun 27, 2023 at 10:51 AM Lance Albertson wrote: > > > On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 9:50 AM Othman Madjoudj > wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> Please note that I've orphaned by packages, list in the end of the >> message. >> >>

Re: [EPEL-devel] Re: Orphaning packages

Lance, I can sponsor/mentor you. I'll reach out to ya via Mattermost. On Tue, Jun 27, 2023 at 10:51 AM Lance Albertson wrote: > > > On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 9:50 AM Othman Madjoudj > wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> Please note that I've orphaned by packages, list in the end of the >> message. >> >>

[EPEL-devel] Re: Orphaning packages

On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 9:50 AM Othman Madjoudj wrote: > Hello, > > Please note that I've orphaned by packages, list in the end of the message. > > Best regards > -Othman > > rpms/mod_limitipconn > I'm interested in maintaining this but I am not a packager yet and would need to be onboarded if

Re: Orphaning packages

I've found some folks interested in libmodsecurity and friends. They are not a packager yet but I will work on mentoring and getting them sponsored. On 23.06.2023 00:27, Neil Hanlon wrote: I've taken aria2 and thc-ipv6. Thank you for your contributions, Othman! --Neil On 22.06.2023 18:48,

[EPEL-devel] Re: Orphaning packages

I've found some folks interested in libmodsecurity and friends. They are not a packager yet but I will work on mentoring and getting them sponsored. On 23.06.2023 00:27, Neil Hanlon wrote: I've taken aria2 and thc-ipv6. Thank you for your contributions, Othman! --Neil On 22.06.2023 18:48,

Re: Orphaning packages

I've taken aria2 and thc-ipv6. Thank you for your contributions, Othman! --Neil On 22.06.2023 18:48, Othman Madjoudj wrote: Hello, Please note that I've orphaned by packages, list in the end of the message. Best regards -Othman rpms/aria2 rpms/hydra rpms/libmodsecurity rpms/lynis

[EPEL-devel] Re: Orphaning packages

I've taken aria2 and thc-ipv6. Thank you for your contributions, Othman! --Neil On 22.06.2023 18:48, Othman Madjoudj wrote: Hello, Please note that I've orphaned by packages, list in the end of the message. Best regards -Othman rpms/aria2 rpms/hydra rpms/libmodsecurity rpms/lynis

Re: Orphaning packages

On Thursday, June 22, 2023 11:48:18 AM CDT Othman Madjoudj wrote: > Hello, > > Please note that I've orphaned by packages, list in the end of the message. > > Best regards > -Othman > > > rpms/aria2 > rpms/hydra > rpms/libmodsecurity > rpms/lynis > rpms/mod_limitipconn > rpms/mod_qos >

Re: Orphaning packages

I've taken lynis and python-paramiko. --  Gwyn Ciesla she/her/hers   in your fear, seek only peace  in your fear, seek only love -d. bowie Sent with Proton Mail secure email. --- Original Message --- On Thursday, June 22nd, 2023 at 11:48

Re: Orphaning packages

I've taken chocolate-doom and gif2png. On Tue, Nov 29, 2022 at 7:53 AM Rahul Sundaram wrote: > Hi > > I have orphaned all the packages I used to maintain but haven't had the > time to keep up with in a long time. Feel free to pick them up if you > like. All the best. > >

Re: Orphaning packages

On 14. 11. 19 3:02, Othman Madjoudj wrote: Hello, Due to time constraints, I'm orphaning packages which I'm not using anymore. rpms/python-aiohttp-cors I've taken this one. It is needed by python-black. I've also added a %check section and reported some issues upstream:

Re: orphaning packages recode, python-bibtex, pybliographer

On 2019-08-15, Zoltan Kota wrote: > I am orphaning the following packages: > > recode -- The upstream development of recode is not very active, and I > don't use it anymore. I use it occasionally. I will take it. -- Petr ___ devel mailing list --

Re: Orphaning packages

I'll take abe. https://pagure.io/releng/issue/8519 --  Gwyn Ciesla she/her/hers   in your fear, seek only peace  in your fear, seek only love -d. bowie Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email. ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On Tuesday, July 9, 2019

Re: Orphaning packages

Hello Kiara I volunteer to become package maintainer for - linsmith my FAS is: avigne About piklab, upstream seems dead. I suggest to retire it. Concerning ahkab (and python-deltasigma from same author) unfortunately, project seem to stale and can not compete with ngspice ? If you think

Re: Orphaning packages

> - hstr Taking this one, thanks! Dave ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Orphaning packages

On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 09:50:57AM +0100, Filip Szymański wrote: > - python-epub I am taking this one -- Athos Ribeiro http://www.ime.usp.br/~athoscr ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Re: Orphaning packages

On 15 October 2016 at 13:21, Gerard Ryan wrote: > > I adopted these guys: - eclipse-webtools - uddi4j - wsil4j -- Mat Booth http://fedoraproject.org/get-fedora ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To

Re: Orphaning packages

Took nodejs-* packages. Zuzka - Original Message - From: "Gerard Ryan" To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Sent: Saturday, October 15, 2016 2:21:44 PM Subject: Orphaning packages Hi all, I no longer use the following packages nor have the time to maintain

Re: Orphaning packages

On 10/15/2016 02:21 PM, Gerard Ryan wrote: > Hi all, > > I no longer use the following packages nor have the time to maintain > them, so I'm going to orphan them: Adopted: aether-connector-okhttp eclipse-m2e-core maven-indexer port-allocator-maven-plugin -- Mikolaj Izdebski Software

Re: Orphaning packages

Il 15/10/2016 14:21, Gerard Ryan ha scritto: Hi all, I no longer use the following packages nor have the time to maintain them, so I'm going to orphan them: Hi for now i take these - dtdparser - javaewah - jhighlight - minimal-json - okhttp - openshift-java-client regards .g Thanks,

Re: Orphaning packages

On Tuesday, 20 September 2016 at 11:44, Bastien Nocera wrote: > > > - Original Message - > > On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 11:39:20AM -0400, Bastien Nocera wrote: > > > - gnome-web-photo > > > Requires porting to a newer version of WebKit: > > >

Re: Orphaning packages

- Original Message - > On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 11:39:20AM -0400, Bastien Nocera wrote: > > - gnome-web-photo > > Requires porting to a newer version of WebKit: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1375837 > > I don't think the maintainer (chpe) is still maintaining it

Re: Orphaning packages

Am 16.09.2016 07:11, schrieb Dan Horák: On Fri, 16 Sep 2016 06:26:47 +0200 Jens Lody wrote: Am Thu, 15 Sep 2016 11:39:20 -0400 (EDT) schrieb Bastien Nocera : > - gnome-dvb-daemon > Is maintained, upstream. Unfortunately, I don't use DVB-T at all >

Re: Orphaning packages

On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 11:39:20AM -0400, Bastien Nocera wrote: > - gnome-web-photo > Requires porting to a newer version of WebKit: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1375837 > I don't think the maintainer (chpe) is still maintaining it upstream It is just Vincent now because

Re: Orphaning packages

On Fri, 16 Sep 2016 06:26:47 +0200 Jens Lody wrote: > Am Thu, 15 Sep 2016 11:39:20 -0400 (EDT) > schrieb Bastien Nocera : > > - gnome-dvb-daemon > > Is maintained, upstream. Unfortunately, I don't use DVB-T at all > > anymore, but the latest versions

Re: Orphaning packages

Am Thu, 15 Sep 2016 11:39:20 -0400 (EDT) schrieb Bastien Nocera : > - gnome-dvb-daemon > Is maintained, upstream. Unfortunately, I don't use DVB-T at all > anymore, but the latest versions should nicely integrate with GNOME > Videos, by providing a channels list through

Re: Orphaning packages

On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 10:39 AM, Bastien Nocera wrote: > Hey, > > - rhythmbox and libgpod > It's still maintained upstream, and the maintainer > is responsive. The iPod/Music syncing functionality doesn't work with > newer/supported versions of iOS. I'll carry on

Re: Orphaning packages

2016-08-30 15:08 GMT+02:00 Antonio Trande : > On 08/30/2016 11:26 AM, Mario Ceresa wrote: >> Dear all, >> I'm orphaning the following packages due to not enough time to be a >> proper mantainer: >> >> * dcmtk (https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/dcmtk/) >> *

Re: Orphaning packages

On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 11:37 AM, Mario Ceresa wrote: > Hi Antonio, > I think Igor took ownership yesterday after I orphaned them Yes, I took them and added all ACLs for Mario. In week or two I will go through all bugs and will comment them and update packages. > > Best, >

Re: Orphaning packages

Hi Antonio, I think Igor took ownership yesterday after I orphaned them Best, Mario On Tue, 30 Aug 2016 at 15:09 Antonio Trande wrote: > On 08/30/2016 11:26 AM, Mario Ceresa wrote: > > Dear all, > > I'm orphaning the following packages due to not enough time to be a > >

Re: Orphaning packages

On 08/30/2016 11:26 AM, Mario Ceresa wrote: > Dear all, > I'm orphaning the following packages due to not enough time to be a > proper mantainer: > > * dcmtk (https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/dcmtk/) > * gdcm (https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/gdcm/) > > I'll

Re: Orphaning packages

On Sat, Apr 9, 2016 at 4:02 PM, Cosimo Cecchi wrote: > I just orphaned the following packages: > > - abattis-cantarell-fonts (devel, F24, F23, F22, EPEL6) > - anjuta (devel, F24, F23, F22) > Taken. > - gnome-themes-standard (devel, F24, F23, F22) > - gnome-weather

Re: Orphaning packages

- Original Message - > From: "Cosimo Cecchi" > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" > > Sent: Saturday, April 9, 2016 11:02:36 PM > Subject: Orphaning packages > > I just orphaned the following packages: > > -

Re: Orphaning packages (i)

Hi On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 2:56 PM, Christopher Meng wrote: > Hi folks, > > I decide to orphan some packages I won't use anymore, here is the first > part. > > I've took: python-couchdbkit python-foolscap Best regards. -- Athmane -- devel mailing list

Re: Orphaning Packages / Looking for Maintainers

On 09/27/2014 07:13 PM, Sebastian Dziallas wrote: * python-oauth I can take this signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct:

Re: Orphaning Packages / Looking for Maintainers

On 09/27/2014 05:13 PM, Sebastian Dziallas wrote: * gstreamer-plugins-espeak * pybox2d * python-elements * python-oauth * sugar-logos * sugar-physics * sugar-tamtam All gone. That was fast. Thanks! Sebastian -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Orphaning packages

On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 12:51:18PM -0800, Manuel F Martinez wrote: Hello list, Due to lack of time I'm orphaning audacity on Fedora branch, EL5/6 branch is already taken. Thank you and sorry about the inconvenience. Since I use this weekly for my podcast, I'll gladly take it. -- Darryl

Re: Orphaning packages

On Seg, 2014-01-06 at 15:56 -0500, Darryl L. Pierce wrote: On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 12:51:18PM -0800, Manuel F Martinez wrote: Hello list, Due to lack of time I'm orphaning audacity on Fedora branch, EL5/6 branch is already taken. Thank you and sorry about the inconvenience.

Re: orphaning packages

On Sat, Nov 30, 2013 at 22:26:17 +0100, Ionuț Arțăriși maple...@fedoraproject.org wrote: Hi, I have orphaned the following packages: garden -- An innovative old-school 2D vertical shoot-em-up Is this one worth keeping? It doesn't look like it is being developed any more, but if the game

Re: orphaning packages

Dne 30.11.2013 22:26, Ionuț Arțăriși napsal(a): python-tornado -- Scalable, non-blocking web server and tools I need that one so I can take it. -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: orphaning packages

On Sun, Dec 1, 2013 at 5:06 PM, Miro Hrončok mhron...@redhat.com wrote: Dne 30.11.2013 22:26, Ionuț Arțăriși napsal(a): python-tornado -- Scalable, non-blocking web server and tools I need that one so I can take it. Hmm, sorry for being faster ;) I didn't see this mail, but only the

Re: orphaning packages

What do you need it for? Is your dependency still working with 3.1.1? pronteserve from printrun httpretty octoprint None of those is in Fedora right now. Feel free to take the package, I'll investigate if 3.1.1 is ok or not. -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok -- devel

Re: orphaning packages

On Sun, Dec 1, 2013 at 9:50 AM, Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote: On Sat, Nov 30, 2013 at 22:26:17 +0100, Ionuț Arțăriși maple...@fedoraproject.org wrote: Hi, I have orphaned the following packages: garden -- An innovative old-school 2D vertical shoot-em-up Is this one worth

Re: orphaning packages

On Sun, Dec 1, 2013 at 6:30 PM, Miro Hrončok mhron...@redhat.com wrote: What do you need it for? Is your dependency still working with 3.1.1? pronteserve from printrun httpretty octoprint None of those is in Fedora right now. Feel free to take the package, I'll investigate if 3.1.1 is ok

Re: orphaning packages

I just took dreampie Sounds useful for me. Thanks. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: orphaning packages

On Sat, 30 Nov 2013 22:26:17 +0100, Ionuț Arțăriși wrote: unittest -- C++ unit testing framework Cannot find any package in the collection that uses this. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct:

Re: Orphaning packages: PySolFC* and lybniz

Stewart, Thank you for indicate, i'm following this process. Marcelo Barbosa Fedora Project Packager/Ambassador fireman...@fedoraproject.org On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 1:08 PM, Stewart Adam maill...@diffingo.com wrote: On 2013-07-06 8:20 PM, Marcelo Barbosa - Fedora Ambassador wrote:

Re: Orphaning packages: PySolFC* and lybniz

On 2013-07-06 8:20 PM, Marcelo Barbosa - Fedora Ambassador wrote: Stewart, I can keep these packages, how to apply ? How should I proceed ? Regards Marcelo Barbosa Hi Marcelo, Great! Please sign-in to the Package DB and claim ownership of the package's branches you wish to maintain.

Re: Orphaning packages: PySolFC* and lybniz

Stewart, I can keep these packages, how to apply ? How should I proceed ? Regards Marcelo Barbosa Fedora Project Packager Fedora Project Ambassador fireman...@fedoraproject.org http://planet.fedoraproject.org On Sat, Jul 6, 2013 at 2:24 PM, Stewart Adam maill...@diffingo.com wrote: Hello,

Re: Orphaning packages

On 07/12/2012 07:08 PM, Jitesh Shah wrote: django-recaptcha Looking deeper into upstream, I think, this package should be deprecated. I'd replace it with a django-recaptcha solutuion from https://github.com/praekelt/django-recaptcha gnome-rdp libdwarf tcptrack Jitesh Thank you for caring

Re: Orphaning packages

On 12/07/12 18:08, Jitesh Shah wrote: libdwarf I've taken this. Tom -- Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu) http://compton.nu/ -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Orphaning packages

On 07/12/2012 07:08 PM, Jitesh Shah wrote: django-recaptcha gnome-rdp In fact, these package have already been taken by somebody without announcement here. -- Matthias Runge mru...@matthias-runge.de mru...@fedoraproject.org -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Orphaning packages

I have taken tcptrack Op 12 jul. 2012 19:08 schreef Jitesh Shah jitesh.1...@gmail.com het volgende: django-recaptcha gnome-rdp libdwarf tcptrack Jitesh -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel -- devel mailing list

Re: Orphaning packages

I take dejango-recaptcha and gnome-rdp, sorry answer to late 2012/7/13 Patrick Uiterwijk puiterw...@gmail.com I have taken tcptrack Op 12 jul. 2012 19:08 schreef Jitesh Shah jitesh.1...@gmail.com het volgende: django-recaptcha gnome-rdp libdwarf tcptrack Jitesh -- devel mailing list

Re: Orphaning packages

On Sun, 15 Jan 2012 11:28:10 +0100, VS (Vivek) wrote: I have had no time for the past months to look after my packages so I am orphaning them. teseq, mausezahn,samefile. I've taken samefile. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Orphaning packages

I took teseq. 15.01.2012 14:28, Vivek Shah wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 - -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 - - -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I have had no time for the past months to look after my packages so I am orphaning them.

Re: Orphaning packages

On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 04:40:27PM +1100, Marc Bradshaw wrote: moreutils -- Additional unix utilities docbook2X -- Convert docbook into man and Texinfo perl-Time-Duration -- Time-Duration - rounded or exact English expression of durations I use moreutils on all my machines so I would like

Re: Orphaning packages

Dne 10.1.2012 06:40, Marc Bradshaw napsal(a): sl -- Joke command for when you type 'sl' instead of 'ls' The most important package in whole Fedora repos. I will gladly take it (also, the number of bugs there seems to be acceptable). Matěj -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Orphaning packages

On 01/10/2012 06:40 AM, Marc Bradshaw wrote: Hi All, I am unable to devote the necessary time at the moment, so I am orphaning the following packages. Please feel free to grab them if they are of interest to you. GREYCstoration -- An image denoising and interpolation tool Upstream have

Re: Orphaning packages

On Tue, 2011-11-01 at 17:56 -0300, James Bowes wrote: python-vobject -- A python library for manipulating vCard and vCalendar files I have taken this one. Pierre -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Orphaning packages

On Tue, 2011-11-01 at 17:56 -0300, James Bowes wrote: gitg -- GTK+ graphical interface for the git revision control system This one seem to already have found a new owner: nacho. Pierre -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Orphaning packages

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 01/11/11 21:56, James Bowes wrote: ipython -- An enhanced interactive Python shell mod_wsgi -- A WSGI interface for Python web applications in Apache I'm interested in those two packages and requested rights in pkgdb. Is there no branch

Re: Orphaning packages

On Wed, Nov 02, 2011 at 08:54:13AM +0100, Matthias Runge wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 01/11/11 21:56, James Bowes wrote: ipython -- An enhanced interactive Python shell mod_wsgi -- A WSGI interface for Python web applications in Apache I'm interested in

Re: Orphaning packages

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 02/11/11 17:23, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: Is there no branch mod_wsgi for epel6? I believe mod_wsgi is in RHEL6 thus no EPEL6 branch at this time. -Toshio Yes it is. I just checked this (should have done this earlier, before asking) - --

Re: Orphaning packages

Hi, Owing to limited time recently I have been unable to look into my packages and so I am orphaning the following packages: agave gnujump mausezahn moe peppy gnurobots It would be nice if someone can pick them up. Done, except for agave. Does it need to stay dead? I only see

Re: Orphaning packages

Hi, Owing to limited time recently I have been unable to look into my packages and so I am orphaning the following packages: agave gnujump mausezahn moe peppy gnurobots It would be nice if someone can pick them up. Done, except for agave. Does it need to stay dead? I only see

Re: Orphaning packages

On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 02:43:43PM -0400, Casey Dahlin wrote: On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 11:23:06AM -0700, Jesse Keating wrote: I no longer have a need/care for these packages, they are up for grabs: contacts inotail I'll take inotail. --CJD Someone pointed out that this

Re: Orphaning packages

On 07/06/2011 10:43 PM, Casey Dahlin wrote: On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 11:23:06AM -0700, Jesse Keating wrote: I no longer have a need/care for these packages, they are up for grabs: contacts inotail I'll take inotail. --CJD Just for the note - there tailf util in util-linux package does the

  1   2   >