Re: Package Question

2018-01-10 Thread Neal Gompa
On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 12:21 PM, Steve Dickson wrote: > Hello, > > Is it a problem for a package to pull from two different > upstream tar balls? Basically have > > Source0: http://server.com/package1/package1.tar > Source1: http://server.com/package2/package2.tar > > Then I

Re: Package Question

2018-01-10 Thread Steve Dickson
Thanks for all the input... very interesting. But I decide to go a head can create a new package which eliminates all the questions about lifecycles dependencies, licenses, etc Again, thanks for all the input! steved. On 01/08/2018 12:21 PM, Steve Dickson wrote: > Hello, > > Is it a

Re: Package Question

2018-01-09 Thread Adam Williamson
On Mon, 2018-01-08 at 12:21 -0500, Steve Dickson wrote: > Hello, > > Is it a problem for a package to pull from two different > upstream tar balls? Basically have > > Source0: http://server.com/package1/package1.tar > Source1: http://server.com/package2/package2.tar > > Then I would, by hand,

Re: Package Question

2018-01-09 Thread Miroslav Suchý
Dne 8.1.2018 v 18:21 Steve Dickson napsal(a): > Hello, > > Is it a problem for a package to pull from two different > upstream tar balls? Basically have > > Source0: http://server.com/package1/package1.tar > Source1: http://server.com/package2/package2.tar > > Then I would, by hand, untar

Re: Package Question

2018-01-09 Thread Paul Howarth
On 2018-01-08 17:21, Steve Dickson wrote: Hello, Is it a problem for a package to pull from two different upstream tar balls? Basically have Source0: http://server.com/package1/package1.tar Source1: http://server.com/package2/package2.tar Then I would, by hand, untar Source1 into Source0

Re: Package Question

2018-01-08 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 3:38 PM, Fernando Nasser wrote: > On 2018-01-08 3:07 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: >> >> On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 2:32 PM, Fernando Nasser >> wrote: >>> >>> On 2018-01-08 12:21 PM, Steve Dickson wrote: Hello, Is it a

Re: Package Question

2018-01-08 Thread Fernando Nasser
On 2018-01-08 3:07 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 2:32 PM, Fernando Nasser wrote: On 2018-01-08 12:21 PM, Steve Dickson wrote: Hello, Is it a problem for a package to pull from two different upstream tar balls? Basically have Source0:

Re: Package Question

2018-01-08 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 2:32 PM, Fernando Nasser wrote: > On 2018-01-08 12:21 PM, Steve Dickson wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> Is it a problem for a package to pull from two different >> upstream tar balls? Basically have >> >> Source0: http://server.com/package1/package1.tar >>

Re: Package Question

2018-01-08 Thread Fernando Nasser
On 2018-01-08 12:21 PM, Steve Dickson wrote: Hello, Is it a problem for a package to pull from two different upstream tar balls? Basically have Source0: http://server.com/package1/package1.tar Source1: http://server.com/package2/package2.tar Important questions: 1) Are the lifecycles the

Re: Package Question

2018-01-08 Thread nicolas . mailhot
Hi, It can be done but it's a PITA to maintain and it's a very bad idea to do if the two packages are actually two different projects with different lifecycle expectations, legalities, etc See the convolutions of the %setup macro Regards, -- Nicolas Mailhot

Re: Package Question

2018-01-08 Thread Rob Crittenden
Ben Rosser wrote: > On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 12:58 PM, Rob Crittenden wrote: >> Florian Weimer wrote: >>> On 01/08/2018 06:21 PM, Steve Dickson wrote: Is it a problem for a package to pull from two different upstream tar balls? Basically have

Re: Package Question

2018-01-08 Thread Ben Rosser
On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 12:58 PM, Rob Crittenden wrote: > Florian Weimer wrote: >> On 01/08/2018 06:21 PM, Steve Dickson wrote: >>> Is it a problem for a package to pull from two different >>> upstream tar balls? Basically have >>> >>>

Re: Package Question

2018-01-08 Thread Rob Crittenden
Florian Weimer wrote: > On 01/08/2018 06:21 PM, Steve Dickson wrote: >> Is it a problem for a package to pull from two different >> upstream tar balls? Basically have >> >> Source0:http://server.com/package1/package1.tar >> Source1:http://server.com/package2/package2.tar >> >> Then I would, by

Re: Package Question

2018-01-08 Thread Florian Weimer
On 01/08/2018 06:21 PM, Steve Dickson wrote: Is it a problem for a package to pull from two different upstream tar balls? Basically have Source0:http://server.com/package1/package1.tar Source1:http://server.com/package2/package2.tar Then I would, by hand, untar Source1 into Source0 directory.

Re: Package Question

2018-01-08 Thread William Moreno
2018-01-08 11:21 GMT-06:00 Steve Dickson : > Hello, > > Is it a problem for a package to pull from two different > upstream tar balls? Basically have > > Source0: http://server.com/package1/package1.tar > Source1: http://server.com/package2/package2.tar > > Then I would, by

Re: Package question: zanata-platform

2017-01-18 Thread Ms Sanchez
On 18/01/17 08:29, Ding Yi Chen wrote: On version 4.0.0, we merge all the sub projects like parent, api, common, client and server into zanata-platform. At this point, we have no plan to pack server as RPM yet, because there too many dependencies to solve (Maven and Java-scripts) Should I