Hi, I remember a few years ago an imageMagick upgrade , we made one
compat-ImageMagick693 [1] and after a few days the packages was not
needed anymore .
I propose do the same , do one compat-ImageMagick6.9.12 and after
upgrade ImageMagick to 7 ...
[1]
On Tue, Oct 26, 2021 at 10:47:14AM -, Michael J Gruber wrote:
> Sounds as if we need to keep ImageMagick 6.x for legacy reasons as long as
> it's safe to do so, but instead of switching to 7.x at some point,
> switching to GraphicsMagick is at most as much work if not less, but more
>
Sounds as if we need to keep ImageMagick 6.x for legacy reasons as long as it's
safe to do so, but instead of switching to 7.x at some point, switching to
GraphicsMagick is at most as much work if not less, but more future-proof?
[Judging from the current state of upstreams which is subject to
On 2021-10-15 21:38, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
@Luya, apologies for not providing you with a little more knowledge of
the package. It isn't a simple package to maintain. Upgrades require
great, great care and lots of rebuilds and alignment with other
packages on every update.
@Michael,
On 10/14/21 11:17 PM, Neal Gompa wrote:
Also note that ImageMagick is in the unusual position of not actually
being upgraded to the latest version. One of the first things that
you'll probably want to look at is upgrading it to ImageMagick 7.x.
ImageMagick 6.x is not maintained upstream as far
> Am 15.10.2021 um 06:17 schrieb Neal Gompa :
>
> you'll probably want to look at is upgrading it to ImageMagick 7.x.
> ImageMagick 6.x is not maintained upstream as far as I can tell.
https://imagemagick.org/index.php: "We continue to maintain the legacy release
of ImageMagick, version 6, at
On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 6:27 PM Matthew Miller wrote:
>
> On Wed, Oct 13, 2021 at 08:13:55AM -0400, Troy Curtis Jr wrote:
> > > I will take that package because it is used by Fedora Design team for
> > > conversion and some applications depend on it.
> > Luya, if you'd also like some help, I'd be
On Wed, Oct 13, 2021 at 08:13:55AM -0400, Troy Curtis Jr wrote:
> > I will take that package because it is used by Fedora Design team for
> > conversion and some applications depend on it.
> Luya, if you'd also like some help, I'd be happy to co-maintain this with
> you. I find myself using it in
On 2021-10-13 05:13, Troy Curtis Jr wrote:
On Tue, Oct 12, 2021, 10:14 PM Luya Tshimbalanga
wrote:
On 2021-10-12 15:37, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I would like to put out a public call for a new primary owner for
> ImageMagick[1].
>
> I only
On Tue, Oct 12, 2021, 10:14 PM Luya Tshimbalanga
wrote:
>
> On 2021-10-12 15:37, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I would like to put out a public call for a new primary owner for
> > ImageMagick[1].
> >
> > I only picked it up a few years ago to prevent it from being orphaned,
> >
On 2021-10-12 15:37, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
Hi all,
I would like to put out a public call for a new primary owner for
ImageMagick[1].
I only picked it up a few years ago to prevent it from being orphaned,
but I no longer have the desire or time to maintain it.
Thanks,
Michael
[1]
11 matches
Mail list logo