On Sun., Feb. 9, 2020, 11:15 a.m. Jerry James, wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 9, 2020 at 4:21 AM Elliott Sales de Andrade
> wrote:
> > Looking at policies, I see one for non-responsive maintainerw [1], but
> > I don't think this really applies. There's a page about the package
> > review process [2]
On Sun, Feb 9, 2020 at 5:15 PM Jerry James wrote:
>
> On Sun, Feb 9, 2020 at 4:21 AM Elliott Sales de Andrade
> wrote:
> > Looking at policies, I see one for non-responsive maintainerw [1], but
> > I don't think this really applies. There's a page about the package
> > review process [2] which
On Sun, Feb 9, 2020 at 4:21 AM Elliott Sales de Andrade
wrote:
> Looking at policies, I see one for non-responsive maintainerw [1], but
> I don't think this really applies. There's a page about the package
> review process [2] which mentions several items about non-responsive
> *submitters*, but
On Sun, Feb 9, 2020 at 6:21 AM Elliott Sales de Andrade
wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I've been waiting almost 2 months for my reviewer to respond on my
> package request. I pinged and set needinfo some time ago, but still
> nothing. My package is FTBFS and FTI in F31, and I've been stuck
> because of
