On 01/28/2013 03:02 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
GLIBC 2.17 was released at the end of 2012; we have been closely tracking the
GLIBC 2.17 development code in Fedora Rawhide and addressing any issues as
they arise.
The __secure_getenv to secure_getenv renaming need to be reflected in a few
On 01/28/2013 06:31 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Florian Weimer (fwei...@redhat.com) said:
See http://sourceware.org/glibc/wiki/Tips_and_Tricks/secure_getenv
for code snippets to implement in the change in a
backwards-compatible fashion. Unfortunately, glibc upstream
insistent on renaming before
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 10:39:21AM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
On 01/28/2013 06:31 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Florian Weimer (fwei...@redhat.com) said:
See http://sourceware.org/glibc/wiki/Tips_and_Tricks/secure_getenv
for code snippets to implement in the change in a
backwards-compatible
On 01/29/2013 10:47 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
Precisely because it's in the private namespace, glibc could just
have documented the existing __secure_getenv symbol. It's not that
there aren't any public functions starting with __. But this was
rejected by upstream, and now we have the
On Mon, 2013-01-28 at 11:02 +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
GLIBC 2.17 was released at the end of 2012; we have been closely tracking
the
GLIBC 2.17 development code in Fedora Rawhide and addressing any issues as
they arise.
The __secure_getenv to secure_getenv renaming need to be
GLIBC 2.17 was released at the end of 2012; we have been closely tracking the
GLIBC 2.17 development code in Fedora Rawhide and addressing any issues as
they arise.
The __secure_getenv to secure_getenv renaming need to be reflected in a
few packages (as of Fedora 18):
On Mon, 28 Jan 2013 11:02:31 +0100
Florian Weimer fwei...@redhat.com wrote:
GLIBC 2.17 was released at the end of 2012; we have been closely
tracking the GLIBC 2.17 development code in Fedora Rawhide and
addressing any issues as they arise.
The __secure_getenv to secure_getenv renaming
Florian Weimer (fwei...@redhat.com) said:
See http://sourceware.org/glibc/wiki/Tips_and_Tricks/secure_getenv
for code snippets to implement in the change in a
backwards-compatible fashion. Unfortunately, glibc upstream
insistent on renaming before making the symbol official.
I'm a little